Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who impressed and who sucked - preseason game 1


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

The hatred on this forum for Corral is amazing.  Young goes 4-6 66.7% for 21 yds and the blame goes to the offensive line. Rightfully So. Corral doesn't light up the world and he sucks. (15-22 126yd 68.2% 0TD 1 Int) This mainly comes from the same group of people that said he sucked after Fhules Debacle on the QB position last year.  God knows you all to be wrong.  

Others believe he had a decent week considering the play of the offensive line and him not playing for nearly a year.   It behooves us that he improves.  One, Dalton isn't going to be around forever, two a good young backup helps us if we happen to lose Young. Three, the backups available at this moment are far worse than a young Corral. Four, which could happen especially for a young team. Corral is traded for picks.  I am sure there are more reasons to hope he improves. 

Carolina Panthers News: Matt Corral, Frank Reich, Bryce Young and Amare Barno (catcrave.com)

Yeah I know, it was against scrubs that won't make the NFL roster.  This is Corral's fault?

I am pulling for Young to be our savior.  I think he really is going to be very good once the regular season starts.  The weekly fear will be, is this the week he gets cremated by a 350 DT and survives?  

 

Edited by DaveThePanther2008
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, poundaway said:

No, Christensen and Icky both got burned on stunts...as if they hadn't played  a season together last year.

 

 

Christensen picked up the man moving inside. It was Icky that got beat.

Unless you're calling out a later play that got Christensen ofc (I'm not recalling any, but plan on watching the all-22 during meetings today 👀)

Screenshot_20230815_090223_YouTube.thumb.jpg.c0d2ec94aad55fa0d9956705fea61fad.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

The hatred on this forum for Corral is amazing.  Young goes 4-6 66.7% for 21 yds and the blame goes to the offensive line. Rightfully So. Corral doesn't light up the world and he sucks. (15-22 126yd 68.2% 0TD 1 Int) This mainly comes from the same group of people that said he sucked after Fhules Debacle on the QB position last year.  God knows you all to be wrong.  

Others believe he had a decent week considering the play of the offensive line and him not playing for nearly a year.   It behooves us that he improves.  One, Dalton isn't going to be around forever, two a good young backup helps us if we happen to lose Young. Three, the backups available at this moment are far worse than a young Corral. Four, which could happen especially for a young team. Corral is traded for picks.  I am sure there are more reasons to hope he improves. 

Carolina Panthers News: Matt Corral, Frank Reich, Bryce Young and Amare Barno (catcrave.com)

Yeah I know, it was against scrubs that won't make the NFL roster.  This is Corral's fault?

I am pulling for Young to be our savior.  I think he really is going to be very good once the regular season starts.  The weekly fear will be, is this the week he gets cremated by a 350 DT and survives?  

 

It’s the eye test for me. Corral looks lost and uncomfortable in the pocket. The third stringer got the Jets looked worlds better than Corral

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

The hatred on this forum for Corral is amazing.  Young goes 4-6 66.7% for 21 yds and the blame goes to the offensive line. Rightfully So. Corral doesn't light up the world and he sucks. (15-22 126yd 68.2% 0TD 1 Int) This mainly comes from the same group of people that said he sucked after Fhules Debacle on the QB position last year.  God knows you all to be wrong.  

Others believe he had a decent week considering the play of the offensive line and him not playing for nearly a year.   It behooves us that he improves.  One, Dalton isn't going to be around forever, two a good young backup helps us if we happen to lose Young. Three, the backups available at this moment are far worse than a young Corral. Four, which could happen especially for a young team. Corral is traded for picks.  I am sure there are more reasons to hope he improves. 

Carolina Panthers News: Matt Corral, Frank Reich, Bryce Young and Amare Barno (catcrave.com)

Yeah I know, it was against scrubs that won't make the NFL roster.  This is Corral's fault?

I am pulling for Young to be our savior.  I think he really is going to be very good once the regular season starts.  The weekly fear will be, is this the week he gets cremated by a 350 DT and survives?  

 

Agreed there is no reason to get ride of Corral especially with the new rules where you can keep a 3rd qb on the inactive roster so he doesnt take up a roster spot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Camp Fodder said:

It’s the eye test for me. Corral looks lost and uncomfortable in the pocket. The third stringer got the Jets looked worlds better than Corral

Lets face it, he is basically a rookie all over again. He may look lost at times. He did show some nice ability to complete a pass though which has been hard to find in a Panthers QB since healthy Cam in his prime.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Icege said:

Christensen picked up the man moving inside. It was Icky that got beat.

Unless you're calling out a later play that got Christensen ofc (I'm not recalling any, but plan on watching the all-22 during meetings today 👀)

Screenshot_20230815_090223_YouTube.thumb.jpg.c0d2ec94aad55fa0d9956705fea61fad.jpg

That's not the play I was referring to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, poundaway said:

That's not the play I was referring to.

Do you recall when that play took place? I just watched all three of the first offensive series that Christensen participated in (he didn't play after that) and he wasn't beaten by a single stunt. In fact, he picked up three stunts including the one Icky missed.

The only two negative plays were a play where he got pushed back a yard but went no further and another play where he got pushed back a good bit but wasn't the reason for the sack.

EDIT: I think that you're mistaking Christensen for Mays. During the first preseason game Bryce gets hit on the overthrow to DJ Chark. The hit came as a result of Cade Mays not picking up the stunt. That might have been what you saw.

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Camp Fodder said:

I agree on keeping a third QB. Just not Corral. Let’s see what Luton has

personally i'd rather see what Corral (who essentially had a redshirt year in a terrible environment but now has a good mentor in Dalton and good QB coaches) can do rather than a qb who is on his 6th team in 4 years and in his 3 career starts comitted 8 turnovers (granted it was his rookie year). Luton hasnt exactly lit it up in preseason either. last year he was 22/38 (58%) for 186 (4.9 YPA/8.6 YPC) 0 TD and 1 INT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With Freddie Slavin and Svech both playing at MVP levels, no one can touch us. Burns playing well.  Imagine if Jarvy and Aho get going…
    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
×
×
  • Create New...