Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Varking said:

So you are picking to remember bits of what I have written in the past and dismiss the other bits. 

To be clear I have never been fully anti Bryce. My questions around him were always, and will always be his size. I worry that at his weight he will have a hard time taking hits over the years compared to some bigger guys. I never questioned his leadership, his talent, his mental makeup, none of it. The most you could say I have ever critiqued any part of his game is that he has an NFL average to below average arm. 

I have also been very clear in my posting history to note that I feel like anyone who we drafted was going to have success here. We have talent along the line, at WR, at TE and at RB. Its the most complete unit we have had on an offensive unit in some time here. We also have majorly experienced coaches. All the recipes are there for our young QB to succeed. 

If Bryce balls out, I will say he balled out. If he sucks I will say he sucks. And anything in between. I am sure he will flourish here. I'm not some hater who cropped up recently on this message board I have been around a long time and been honest in what I see for as long as I can remember here. I have no need to get defensive or be a homer about a specific player. I'm also a Florida Gator fan and I never let that get in the way of how I project these kids to be as pros which is why I never pitched for us to draft Kyle Trask despite him having the greatest passing single season in Gator history. 

As far as pooing, I believe pooing is stupid and I only ever use it in one scenario: I poo the guys who poo me. Its a message board. Just type your thought process and have a dialogue. I just click the dude who poo'd my post, go to their most recent post and click poo and chuckle. 

You like to present yourself as this arbiter of objectivity who keeps it real.  But let's take a look at how you treat your guys vs. someone like Young.

Fields (all last year): poor guy played behind an awful o-line, can't hold it against him with that kind of supporting cast, etc.

Stroud (preseason game 1): only threw four passes, people are overreacting to his awful interception

Bryce (preseason game 1): meh, looked okay...didn't flash.  Didn't feel the pressure at times.  Tons of articles highlighting his disappointing debut (lol)

So Bryce threw two more passes than Stroud and you're pretty comfortable evaluating (i.e. criticizing) his performance, whereas Stroud's sample size was just far too small to be critical.  Also Bryce getting drilled multiple times behind awful protection was his fault that he didn't feel the pressure...but poor Fields who took a million sacks in college and also unsurprisingly a million sacks in the NFL is just a victim of his terrible o-line.  Nothing attributing his sacks to his own awareness like you've done to Bryce.

The double standards are pretty wild actually.  You think you are objective?  Far from it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

You like to present yourself as this arbiter of objectivity who keeps it real.  But let's take a look at how you treat your guys vs. someone like Young.

Fields (all last year): poor guy played behind an awful o-line, can't hold it against him with that kind of supporting cast, etc.

Stroud (preseason game 1): only threw four passes, people are overreacting to his awful interception

Bryce (preseason game 1): meh, looked okay...didn't flash.  Didn't feel the pressure at times.  Tons of articles highlighting his disappointing debut (lol)

So Bryce threw two more passes than Stroud and you're pretty comfortable evaluating (i.e. criticizing) his performance, whereas Stroud's sample size was just far too small to be critical.  Also Bryce getting drilled multiple times behind awful protection was his fault that he didn't feel the pressure...but poor Fields who took a million sacks in college and also unsurprisingly a million sacks in the NFL is just a victim of his terrible o-line.  Nothing attributing his sacks to his own awareness like you've done to Bryce.

The double standards are pretty wild actually.  You think you are objective?  Far from it.

That is an objective look. Fields played with no talent around him and a poor line. Is that up for dispute? Have I ever written he’s not at fault for some of his sacks? Nope. 
 

Stroud was out there for like 30 seconds and I acknowledged he threw an awful INT. But it’s one game and people overreacted to the pick. Is that up for dispute?

 

Bryce did not flash at all. He obviously didn’t feel the pressure on one of the bigger sacks. We didn’t convert any third downs and didn’t get a field goal or touchdown. That isn’t flashing. Is that up for dispute? 
 

But I’ve also defended Bryce on here that he hasn’t been given too much for his plate and said he didn’t look overwhelmed at all in his debut. 
 

What is so terrible about what I wrote? 
 

I like Fields and I am a fan of his and do want to see him do well. I’m not attached to Stroud like that so he’s not one of “my guys”. And I was openly excited for our first preseason game as I’ve written here on this site. And Bryce is a big reason for that. 

Edited by Varking
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Varking said:

That is an objective look. Fields played with no talent around him and a poor line. Is that up for dispute? Have I ever written he’s not at fault for some of his sacks? Nope. 
 

Stroud was out there for like 30 seconds and I acknowledged he threw an awful INT. But it’s one game and people overreacted to the pick. Is that up for dispute?

 

Bryce did not flash at all. He obviously didn’t feel the pressure on one of the bigger sacks. We didn’t convert any third downs and didn’t get a field goal or touchdown. That isn’t flashing. Is that up for dispute? 
 

But I’ve also defended Bryce on here that he hasn’t been given too much for his plate and said he didn’t look overwhelmed at all in his debut. 
 

What is so terrible about what I wrote? 
 

I like Fields and I am a fan of his and do want to see him do well. I’m not attached to Stroud like that so he’s not one of “my guys”. And I was openly excited for our first preseason game as I’ve written here on this site. And Bryce is a big reason for that. 

Yeah obviously there's truth in all of those evaluations.  The double standards are with the framing of your posts and what you choose to highlight when talking about a player unprompted.  There's a difference between not disputing that some of Fields' sacks were on him, vs. readily jumping at the opportunity to criticize him for not feeling the pressure on those sacks.  You have never done the latter for Fields, despite him leading the league in Sack Rate in each of the last two seasons.  You were quick to do so for Bryce's very first preseason game.  That's pretty telling.

Yes Bryce "not flashing" is up for dispute.  Plenty of people would argue that poise in the pocket and showing the ability to quickly go through progressions are areas you can "flash" in for your NFL debut.  Arguably those are the hardest traits for rookies to acquire in their transition to the NFL.  You seem to be one of those "Box Score" analysts who extracts all of his talking points straight from the Box Score, which meshes with the other thread where you extracted your talking points straight from article headlines rather than diving into the substance of the articles.

Your bar for objectivity seems to be that you don't egregiously lie about players.  That's a pretty silly bar.  You can be "not wrong" about your analyses but be heavily biased in your framing of certain players' performances.  Highlighting the positives of players you like and dismissing/ignoring the negatives, while highlighting the negatives of players you dislike and ignoring/dismissing the positives.  I don't even think you dislike Bryce, I think you're doing that petty thing that lots of people do where you spite-post because you're annoyed at how many people were/are hyping him up when you wanted someone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Yeah obviously there's truth in all of those evaluations.  The double standards are with the framing of your posts and what you choose to highlight when talking about a player unprompted.  There's a difference between not disputing that some of Fields' sacks were on him, vs. readily jumping at the opportunity to criticize him for not feeling the pressure on those sacks.  You have never done the latter for Fields, despite him leading the league in Sack Rate in each of the last two seasons.  You were quick to do so for Bryce's very first preseason game.  That's pretty telling.

Yes Bryce "not flashing" is up for dispute.  Plenty of people would argue that poise in the pocket and showing the ability to quickly go through progressions are areas you can "flash" in for your NFL debut.  Arguably those are the hardest traits for rookies to acquire in their transition to the NFL.  You seem to be one of those "Box Score" analysts who extracts all of his talking points straight from the Box Score, which meshes with the other thread where you extracted your talking points straight from article headlines rather than diving into the substance of the articles.

Your bar for objectivity seems to be that you don't egregiously lie about players.  That's a pretty silly bar.  You can be "not wrong" about your analyses but be heavily biased in your framing of certain players' performances.  Highlighting the positives of players you like and dismissing/ignoring the negatives, while highlighting the negatives of players you dislike and ignoring/dismissing the positives.  I don't even think you dislike Bryce, I think you're doing that petty thing that lots of people do where you spite-post because you're annoyed at how many people were/are hyping him up when you wanted someone else.

I have nothing against Bryce at all. My question around him was healthy related based on his weight. I also never cared about the height. Anybody we throw out there I’m looking for positives.

As far as being spiteful because I preferred we drafted Stroud, I think of Stroud had the same line I’d say the same thing. It wasn’t what I was hoping for. 
 

My disappointment stems from us having a beyond experienced staff, upgrades all over on offense from last season, upgrade at QB with a prospect whose only flaw for most folks was his size, and we went out and had a dud. It’s as pure as that. It was a dud performance. 
 

Now, we can try to highlight the nicer parts of a turd but I mean, at the end of the day, we got like two first downs, converted no third downs, gained minimal yards and left the field every drive with zero points. 
 

It’s hard for me to feel great about that. Was it all his fault? Absolutely not. And maybe we just have different definitions of flashing. Flashing, to me, would be making a throw into a tight window that gets us a first down or a 15+ yard throw. Maybe flashing for you is looking off defenders early in his career. 
 

But that’s something I EXPECT from Bryce. His mental score, his leadership and his history told me these are things he would be doing already. He did these things at Alabama, too. 
 

I don’t know. I guess my bar for whoever we ended up drafting because of all the pieces around them was going to be different and I got very excited before the start of the game and wanted something to cheer for. And I know it’s just preseason but I haven’t been this excited for a season since 2016 when I thought we’d be on a revenge tour. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Varking said:

As far as being spiteful because I preferred we drafted Stroud, I think of Stroud had the same line I’d say the same thing. It wasn’t what I was hoping for. 

Respectfully, I wholeheartedly disagree.  Based off everything I've seen from you over the last couple years, I think if we're looking at an alternate reality where we took Stroud #1 overall and he had the exact performance as Young on Saturday, I have little doubt that you'd be raising hell exclusively about the o-line.  Similarly, if this was Fields' rookie preseason debut, I think you'd be up in arms about the terrible protection and how they're failing their brand new 1st round QB if that's the kind of o-line they're putting around him.

It'd be like after Fields' 3-3 129 yards 2 TD performance, if I just chose to emphasize how his screen pass to DJ was ugly, he had like 3 total air yards on his passes, and hey maybe his coaches still don't trust his arm if they're basically only giving him screen/swing passes.  Would you read that assessment of Fields' performance and be like "Well, none of that is technically wrong.  That's a pretty fair and objective take" or would you think "hmmm this guy sounds like a bit of a hater"?  And then I talked about how tons of people are saying his performance was Fool's Gold and unimpressive and linked a few articles/videos saying just that.  Those are the kind of vibes you're giving off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Respectfully, I wholeheartedly disagree.  Based off everything I've seen from you over the last couple years, I think if we're looking at an alternate reality where we took Stroud #1 overall and he had the exact performance as Young on Saturday, I have little doubt that you'd be raising hell exclusively about the o-line.  Similarly, if this was Fields' rookie preseason debut, I think you'd be up in arms about the terrible protection and how they're failing their brand new 1st round QB if that's the kind of o-line they're putting around him.

It'd be like after Fields' 3-3 129 yards 2 TD performance, if I just chose to emphasize how his screen pass to DJ was ugly, he had like 3 total air yards on his passes, and hey maybe his coaches still don't trust his arm if they're basically only giving him screen/swing passes.  Would you read that assessment of Fields' performance and be like "Well, none of that is technically wrong.  That's a pretty fair and objective take" or would you think "hmmm this guy sounds like a bit of a hater"?  And then I talked about how tons of people are saying his performance was Fool's Gold and unimpressive and linked a few articles/videos saying just that.  Those are the kind of vibes you're giving off.

Yet I haven’t bragged once anywhere about Fields this preseason because it was a nothing performance. I’ve only pointed out the Bears line still lets people through easily. There was nothing to take away from the Bears game about Fields. Only positives from DJ and from Herbert. Fields needs to be on the field for more drives for me to get excited about this season for him. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

The main improvement I want to see next week is more throws across the middle/down the field.  Seemed like virtually every pass we tried to throw was a side out or 5 yard dump off, even when we had time.  

So the ball to the middle of the field to Thielen on his 3rd read doesn’t count?

or the shot downfield on 3rd down to Chark?

I mean both of those accounted for 33% of his sample size 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, therealmjl said:

So the ball to the middle of the field to Thielen on his 3rd read doesn’t count?

or the shot downfield on 3rd down to Chark?

I mean both of those accounted for 33% of his sample size 

I assumed he meant the whole offense not just Young.  Corral didn't really throw it deep very often.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Varking said:

Yet I haven’t bragged once anywhere about Fields this preseason because it was a nothing performance. I’ve only pointed out the Bears line still lets people through easily. There was nothing to take away from the Bears game about Fields. Only positives from DJ and from Herbert. Fields needs to be on the field for more drives for me to get excited about this season for him. 

I never suggested you bragged about Fields' preseason game.  I was simply asking if you think my theoretical characterization of his performance was fair and objective or if you think it comes across as a hater take.  If Bryce can be criticized for one individual sack that you say he didn't feel the pressure on, then I don't see why you couldn't criticize Fields for his one pretty errant screen pass that was behind DJ who had to adjust.  For the record I think both are very nitpicky, but I'm looking for consistency on your takes.

On a side note: are you talking about the Herbert TD where the Bears' line let people through easily?  Because that was clearly a designed screen pass, so letting people through to get to the second level is kind of the design of the playcall lol.  I mean maybe they disengaged a tad bit too quickly (or maybe Herbert slipped out a bit late, it's hard to say), but that TD was 90% credited to blocking.  I think you are so quick to criticize the Bears' o-line that you don't recognize that they were ironically the star of the preseason game IMO.  DJ basically caught the screen pass and ran a straight line for 62 yards to the end zone because of the superb blocking of the o-line on that play.  Herbert went untouched for almost 50 yards before doing a good job powering through contact within the 5-yard line to secure the TD.

Edited by MasterAwesome
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

The main improvement I want to see next week is more throws across the middle/down the field.  Seemed like virtually every pass we tried to throw was a side out or 5 yard dump off, even when we had time.  

there wasnt a play across the middle. QB school even goes over that. The Jets were running heavy zones inside the hashes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

I never suggested you bragged about Fields' preseason game.  I was simply asking if you think my theoretical characterization of his performance was fair and objective or if you think it comes across as a hater take.  If Bryce can be criticized for one individual sack that you say he didn't feel the pressure on, then I don't see why you couldn't criticize Fields for his one pretty errant screen pass that was behind DJ who had to adjust.  For the record I think both are very nitpicky, but I'm looking for consistency on your takes.

On a side note: are you talking about the Herbert TD where the Bears' line let people through easily?  Because that was clearly a designed screen pass, so letting people through to get to the second level is kind of the design of the playcall lol.  I mean maybe they disengaged a tad bit too quickly (or maybe Herbert slipped out a bit late, it's hard to say), but that TD was 90% credited to blocking.  I think you are so quick to criticize the Bears' o-line that you don't recognize that they were ironically the star of the preseason game IMO.  DJ basically caught the screen pass and ran a straight line for 62 yards to the end zone because of the superb blocking of the o-line on that play.  Herbert went untouched for almost 50 yards before doing a good job powering through contact within the 5-yard line to secure the TD.

You can absolutely critique Fields for an inaccurate screen pass that caused DJ to have to turn for the ball rather than catch it where he is supposed to.
 

The pass to Herbert for the TD had bad blocking. There’s linemen blocking nobody for some of that. If you let a guy go past you it should be to go find a body in the second level to block. I understand you let people by on certain plays to bait them but when you have to have your QB sprint left to make that throw or get clobbered I don’t think all the assignments were nailed on that one. Then look at the downfield blocking and you have EQS running along with his hand on the back of the defenders running alongside them, never blocking them. 
 

Props to their oline who ran their man out of bounds on the play, that was solid. But when the rest of the Bears line shows me they are consistently good I’m going to focus on them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we miss out on Freeling or Lomu, I don't think we take a serious stab at LT this draft. We might take a RT that they think could project to the other side in the mid rounds, but overall, it's a bandage and won't fix the issue if Ickey doesn't return to form form the injury I've mocked it over and and over, it's these two guys or we should pass on LT altogether.   It's a great draft if you need a RT, super deep, but starting caliber LTs are very thin this year.
    • Greetings Huddlers.  Here is my annual analysis of the offense pre-draft in my attempt to predict and understand moves made draft weekend, which is upon us!  I analyze my views on each position and might suggest why I think the Panthers will do what they will do.  This is not my opinion (but there is some bias in it) but more of an educated guess based on the little we know. Quarterback: Gonna start with a conspiracy theory—probably nothing to discuss. It seems that we are going with Bryce, but there was a somewhat interesting statement made about Bryce’s contract.  Morgan (I believe) stated that they would look into Bryce’s contract after the draft.  That probably means that he is busy, but I found it interesting that Draft Kings shows the Panthers as the sixth, “most likely” team to draft Ty Simpson, based on betting lines.  Acquiring Kenny Pickett and moving Andy Dalton to Philly creates another dynamic that could signal some draft day (or post-draft day) drama.  Hurts situation in Philly might have necessitated the Dalton move (again, nothing much more than speculation), but the Panthers taking a younger, former first rounder (I know) could possibly signal a QB competition–depending on what we do draft day.  It seems to me that they are hoping to bring in a UDFA, based on visits.  This is not to say that Bryce is stagnant.  He has improved, and with weapons and a fortress in front of him, he could be better.  I never understood how a QB of his ilk would not have a stud receiving TE and a stud Z WR–he has had neither. Heck, if you cover TMAC like you should with man under and S over the top, you can play zone vs. whoever is playing Z (XL).  So maybe they know something we do not; based on TV coverage, it is hard to see what Bryce sees–how open are his receivers?  They know their jobs are riding on Bryce. In my view, the contract should not be fully guaranteed–the devil will be in the details.    Running Back:  The Panthers were right to let Dowdle walk.  Two RBs on expensive contracts with Brooks possibly emerging as a third option is fiscally irresponsible.   In my view, you make you RBs better with better OL play.  Yes, there are players like CMC etc, but Dowdle peaked here, in terms of historical data that shows RBs peak and start rapidly declining between ages 27 and 28.  Chuba is 26, fwiw, and a tremendous locker room leader. I get it. With Brooks, Etienne, and Dillon behind him, we have a pretty full RB room.  This suggests that they feel good about Brooks.   Tight End:  Personally, I think this draft has some potential at the TE position, and I am not sure that the Panthers will address both Z WR and TE–but I feel they will address one of them.  In my view, I would focus on the Z and give TE another year.  Reason?  Evans showed some promise and will enter year 2.  Sanders has been a bit of a disappointment, but he has potential as well (year 3).  Tremble has been tremendous as a blocker and is actually catching a few passes.  Sadiq would be nice, and there are some solid TE options in this draft, but I am afraid we’d be getting more of the same.  If you draft players on day 3, like all of our TEs, it seems that you need to develop them before casting them aside.   Center:  We are probably more respectable at the C position for 2026 than people realize.  Fortner is basically the equivalent of Cade Mays at a third of the price.  They are about the same age (27 and 26).  Luke Fortner is an center for the Carolina Panthers who earned a 66.5 overall PFF grade in the 2025 season, 18th among 40 qualified centers. He played 678 offensive snaps on the season. Fortner’s  PFF pass-blocking grade of 72.5 ranked 7th among 40 qualified centers in 2025. His run-blocking grade of 65.3 ranked 19th at the position.          Compare that to Mays, who was 24th among 40 qualified centers. He played 726 offensive snaps on the season.  His PFF pass-blocking grade of 69.4 ranked 13th among 40 qualified centers. His run-blocking grade of 58.5 ranked 33rd at the position.  Fortner is actually an upgrade, based on these numbers. To me, the mystery here is Nick Samac, who was originally drafted by the Ravens. The Panthers protected his roster spot last season, something I thought was interesting.  Word on the street is that they like him, but how much?  Samac is a great run blocker for a 24-year old; his issues are in pass protection.  We want to focus on the run, but with a dwarf at QB, we need the middle of the OL to hold up.  If Samac learns to widen his base and get good leverage, we could have a starting-caliber center on our hands at some point.  Is Samac why we let Mays walk?  Is Samac the reason Fortner only got a one-year deal?   Maybe, just maybe, Center is not a huge need.  I think we draft one, but maybe not as soon as you might think.     Guard:  Hunt and Lewis are solid—and expensive–and knocking on the door of 30.  Hunt was injured for most of 2025, but Lewis was very solid.  Lewis: His PFF pass-blocking grade of 79.7 ranked 3rd among 81 qualified offensive guards. His run-blocking grade of 73.1 ranked 14th at the position. Contractually, there is not much we can do if we wanted to move on.  Hunt will count $24m against the cap; Lewis about $17m.  However, in 2027, when both are turning 31, we could save $19m (of $24m) on Hunt’s deal if we cut him post June 1 and $13m of Lewis’ deal if we cut him at any time.  At the same time, Bryce’s big money will kick in, making these moves nearly inevitable. Do not be surprised to see us draft a G this year.  Zavala sucked when he played, and you can expect two 30-year old guards to get banged up. Saahdiq is probably their top reserve guard, and he has been a bust since being drafted in round 4 by Washington.  We need someone for depth in 2026 and possibly to start in 2027.   Tackle:  Ekwonu in 2025: earned a 69.9 overall PFF grade in the 2025 season, 36th among 89 qualified offensive tackles. He played 942 offensive snaps on the season.  He was below average as a pass blocker in 2025 and above average as a run blocker.  (Sure sounds like a Guard BEFORE the injury).He allowed 40 total pressures in pass protection. That total included 5 sacks and 6 hits allowed to opposing pass rushers. He was flagged for 7 penalties over the course of the season.  These numbers are far from elite. However, since he needs the better part of a year to recover–and since we might need 2 guards in 2027, why not give him an incentive-laden GUARD contract and move him to his natural position?  I think I do that, realizing that he can play outside in a pinch (see Wharton, Travelle).  So when I consider Ickey’s return, considering his contract etc. I do not see a return to OT–guard is his position now.   Walker, in my view, was the steal of free agency for the Panthers.  No, he is not an all-star, but he can play at a level I will call “average” for the LT position. In 2025 for the Packers, he earned a 64.6 overall PFF grade, 52nd among 89 qualified offensive tackles (slightly below average). He played 986 offensive snaps on the season.His PFF pass-blocking grade of 70.0 ranked 42nd among 89 qualified offensive tackles (average). His run-blocking grade of 55.4 ranked 71st at the position (well below average). He allowed 34 total pressures in pass protection. That total included 5 sacks and 1 hits allowed to opposing pass rushers. He was flagged for 9 penalties over the course of the season (very similar to Icky–better in pass pro, much worse in run blocking).  Moton: Our best offensive lineman by far. Moton earned a 80.5 overall PFF grade in the 2025 season, 15th among 89 qualified offensive tackles (above average). He played 901 offensive snaps on the season. His PFF pass-blocking grade of 76.5 ranked 21st among 89 qualified offensive tackles. His run-blocking grade of 81.9 ranked 12th at the position (Moton is elite). He allowed 22 total pressures in pass protection. That total included 3 sacks and 4 hits allowed to opposing pass rushers. He was flagged for 5 penalties over the course of the season.  Moton and trainers have been monitoring a “Chronic” knee condition (common in older OL). Moton feels that he can keep playing.  In my view, he can be cut after 2026 (post june 1) and the team would save $19m of his contract at age 33.  Depending how he plays and holds up in 2026, that is a real possibility.   Stone Forsythe: Sounds like a comic book detective.   Wide Receiver:   The Panthers are met with 105 position players in some way (from visits to pro day/combine meetings etc) 2026 Panthers Draft Visits Tracker”There are six potential first round picks on the list–four of them are wide receivers—KC Concepcion, Omar Cooper Jr., Denzel Boston, and Jordan Tyson (personal workout). Concepcion is from Charlotte, so the Panthers almost had to host him for a visit. It’d be an interesting allocation of resources to use three straight first-round picks on wide receivers, especially when an undrafted free agent has already usurped one of those first-round picks. The visits from projected Day 2 players are all over the map. Again, multiple wide receivers appear.  Of the 105 position players the Panthers met with, 15 were Wide Receivers.  They are doing their homework at Wide receiver.   Tetairoa McMillan earned a 78.7 overall PFF grade in the 2025 season, 21st among 81 qualified wide receivers. His PFF receiving grade of 78.7 ranked 23rd among 81 qualified wide receivers (well above average). He hauled in 70 receptions on 120 targets for 1,014 receiving yards and 7 touchdowns. McMillan averaged 14.5 yards per reception on the season.  He generated 271 yards after the catch, demonstrating his ability to create with the ball in his hands. He was charged with 7 drops on the year (clean that up, TMac). His average depth of target was 12.3 yards, reflecting his role in the passing attack.  TMac is a strong X WR.  Jalen Coker: Before the last 7 games of 2025 (beginning Nov 16, 2025), Coker had 66 yards on 7 catches.  After that date, Coker exploded during the final 8 games (including the playoff game) for 462 yards in 35 catches. We need him healthy but he is a stud folks.  The best hands on the team–I would go as far as to say Ricky Proehl hands.  Yep.   Xavier Legette earned a 52.6 overall PFF grade in the 2025 season, 79th among 81 qualified wide receivers (rock bottom). His PFF receiving grade of 54.7 ranked 78th among 81 qualified wide receivers.(still on the bottom) He hauled in 35 receptions on 59 targets for 363 receiving yards and 3 touchdowns. Legette averaged 10.4 yards per reception on the season.  He generated 74 yards after the catch, demonstrating his ability to create with the ball in his hands. He was charged with 1 drop (improvement). His average depth of target was 11.0 yards, reflecting his role in the passing attack.  His contract is not steep (under $4m) and it is fully guaranteed. Financially, it makes no sense to cut him based on the fact that we knew he was raw when we drafted him. The improvement in drops suggests that he is coachable, but his comments during pressers give me anxiety about his mental state. Let him compete. John Metchie III:  Maybe he needed another season with another team–a reunification with Bryce?  Not sure two drowning swimmers can pull each other back into the boat. At any rate, it is worth a shot. Low Risk, high reward?   John Metchie III is a wide receiver for the Carolina Panthers who earned a 57.6 overall PFF grade in the 2025 season, 74th among 81 qualified wide receivers. His PFF receiving grade of 58.7 ranked 73rd among 81 qualified wide receivers.He hauled in 33 receptions on 48 targets for 274 receiving yards and 2 touchdowns. Metchie III averaged 8.3 yards per reception on the season.  He generated 144 yards after the catch, demonstrating his ability to create with the ball in his hands. He was charged with 4 drops on the year. His average depth of target was 5.5 yards, reflecting his role in the passing attack. Jimmy Horn:  They really do not throw it downfield to Horn much—just a reverse, screen guy.  I think there could be more.  He caught 11 passes of 13 targets (1 drop) in 2025 for 120 yards.  In comparison, fwiw, Steve Smith caught 10 passes (20 targets) for 154 yards during his rookie season.  Give him some time. Brycen Tremayne: Tremayne is one of those UDFAs that you root for.  A big (6’4” 212) WR with football intelligence (Stanford), Tremayne quietly had 160 yards in 2025 (14 catches/17 targets).  Not a super star, but an active special team player who can make plays on offense.   Overview:  If I am the Panthers, I forget about Ickey and Moton beyond 2026 as tackles. I pencil in Ickey at Guard and hope that he heals. Having said that, it is quite possible that our entire OL is different by 2027.  Hunt and Lewis will be 31 and their contracts will be ending (cuttable).  Our current starting center (Fortner) will be a free agent.  Our current starting LT will be a free agent.  Yikes. To make matters worse, Bryce’s expected contract (hard to say this) will make free agency an unlikely source for talent.  We need to start building the next room now. Does that mean first rounders?  Of course not.  Most of the guys in the first round this year would not have been last year–so grab kids that are risers “but not there yet.”  This draft is good at the bottom for OL talent–just not great at the top.  Take a few days 2-3.  Not ideal, but you can’t force it.  I think we kept Tremayne (WR) as a key backup, but he is a good fourth WR who can move inside and create mismatches, much like a pass-catching TE–so I do not expect TE in this draft unless we dive in early–Sadiq.  Developing your young talent is a better risk, imo.  Sanders has not scratched his potential and Evans showed some signs.  Tremble is getting better. If they think XL is about to turn the corner as the Z WR, they might go TE, but XL is, according to PFF, one of the worst WRs in the league.  Coker? On an opposite trajectory.  We need a Z WR more than we need a TE, so if we focus on needs on defense (S, LB, DE) and the offense (WR, OL) I am not seeing the luxury of adding a TE to play before our developmental players can reach their potential.  We really have no established depth at WR behind TMac and Coker, so expect a Z in the draft–early. I think they are going with Chuba, Brooks, Eteinne, and Dillon for now at RB.  QB?  It sure looks as though the are going to grab a UDFA to be the emergency QB.  One will fall out of the draft that has the potential to stick in the NFL–which is why we brought them in for visits–we want that team to be us.  I think this is the best evidence that we are “all in” on Bryce.   Predictions:   Round 1:  WR: I still think this is the biggest possibility for round 1 if you go by position.  A rare talent from Oregon (TE or S) could be the pick if the WRs don’t fall, and the same can be said for OL or DL.  This draft is very challenging, but the tea leaves say WR is an area they researched heavily.  By the way, they LOVE Texas Tech LB Rodriquez.  Met with him 3 times.  Do not be surprised…he is my darkhorse.   The betting lines, however, provide some interesting perspectives,and the player’s expected availability is factored in, so take with a grain of salt:   (Panther Wire) For those of you who want an OT (I am not going to cry if we land a Proctor, for example–I totally get it), Morgan said this (in relation to Canales’ comments at the league meeting about the first rounder being an immediate starter):  “"I understand what Coach is saying in terms of—obviously, you want your first-round pick to be able to come in and contribute immediately. So, yeah, I'm kinda with him on that," Morgan stated when asked of Canales' comments. "You want your first-round pick to play, but there's different scenarios to where maybe it takes a guy a little longer to develop, and he may not contribute right away. With some of the picks at different positions, it may take a little longer for those guys to develop, for sure." That could apply to CB or OT, in my opinion.   Round 2: This will probably be defense if they draft WR in round 1, but if they do not, expect the WR in round 2.  I do not see a WR after round 2 helping much–it would be better to go with the TE if that is the case.  I am of the mindset that XL will not emerge to reach his potential, a major indicator of my thinking on this. This will be a LB--they want Rodriguez but the will draft Hill or Golday if WR is taken in round 1. Round 3:  I see DL, S, and TE in my crystal football.  However, my night visions show us taking a TE--Max Klare from Ohio State. I see DE as perhaps our biggest need--but not many share my view--we never replaced Robinson. (This is tough to do) Day 3:  Expect OL OL and maybe DL. Our OL is in its last season together.  A total overhaul is ahead. Keep an eye on Jude Bowry and Austin Barber.  Mark my words!!   So that is it for the offense.  I hope you enjoyed this–by doing this, it helps me understand the currents and the nuances of the draft–I enjoy it more–so this is for me, shared with you.  I will take a look at D and try to share by Tuesday. If you appreciate this, see the link pinned in Huddle and help out if you can- Newborn Twin Granddaughters 
×
×
  • Create New...