Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Michael Oher claims Tuohy family tricked him into agreeing to conservatorship


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

The claims from both sides seem they'd be easy to prove in court. If they've tried to pay him half of everything and he refused so they established a trust account for his son theres receipts. Likewise if his life story was pimped out and he didn't receive a dime and he wasn't actually adopted thats also pretty verifiable. 

I hope whoever is in the right (and in the wrong too I suppose) gets what they deserve. 

I will say, I have to wonder what's happened with Oher since he left the NFL. He was never the same after that week 3 game and concussion against the Vikings as a player. Cant help but wonder if CTE could be a factor here. That picture he posted was super haunting. 

 

Screenshot_20230814_220642_Chrome.jpg

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

Not sure we can say at this point that they were transparent with him.  And what is with the conservatorship (that he did not qualify for) when they could have done an adoption...even though it would have taken more time. If you truly wanted him to be a part of the family, some extra time should not matter.  They chose the route where they got financial control....not a family member.  What they did with that control is in question. I have to wonder if there was also a connection with them wanting him to go to Ole Miss?

didn't Oher turn 18 during his senior year of HS?   Could they have legally adopted him?  That probably is a long process with complicated birth parents in a tiny window.     I mean, I would assume wanting him to be "family" didn't happen immediately during his senior year. 

The he wasn't adopted thing.....  I could get totally see a family using that language even if it wasn't technically true.  And it not being a sinister deception.  Because who would want to say,  this is Micheal he sort of is family.  We have a conservatorship to help him out and protect him.  Which he frankly probably needed. You just call him your adopted son.  

I could imagine well intended or bad intended thoughts knowing so little.  You could basically tell me to paint them sinister or good and I could at this stage knowing so little. 

anyway, sounds like the best decision would have been to say no to a movie.  For Oher.  For that family. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Well only knowing what the movie showed it appears that Mr. Oher is out of money and looking for a way to recoup money he thinks he is entitled to.

We saw a young man roaming the streets and a white couple take him in and treat him as a son. They got him on the field and low and behold he's a monster LT.

I think the it is going to be hard to convince the courts that they tricked him.  It sounds more like they got him to sign the conservatory and now that he is out of money he's looking to get some of it.

I see both side so whoever wins, so be it 

He was supposedly already a bad ass on the field before the Tuhoys. He was all state without them but the movie didnt show that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, CRA said:

didn't Oher turn 18 during his senior year of HS?   Could they have legally adopted him?  That probably is a long process with complicated birth parents in a tiny window.     I mean, I would assume wanting him to be "family" didn't happen immediately during his senior year. 

The he wasn't adopted thing.....  I could get totally see a family using that language even if it wasn't technically true.  And it not being a sinister deception.  Because who would want to say,  this is Micheal he sort of is family.  We have a conservatorship to help him out and protect him.  Which he frankly probably needed. You just call him your adopted son.  

I could imagine well intended or bad intended thoughts knowing so little.  You could basically tell me to paint them sinister or good and I could at this stage knowing so little. 

anyway, sounds like the best decision would have been to say no to a movie.  For Oher.  For that family. 

 

Thats a pretty good assessment there in my opinion

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CRA said:

didn't Oher turn 18 during his senior year of HS?   Could they have legally adopted him?  That probably is a long process with complicated birth parents in a tiny window.     I mean, I would assume wanting him to be "family" didn't happen immediately during his senior year. 

The he wasn't adopted thing.....  I could get totally see a family using that language even if it wasn't technically true.  And it not being a sinister deception.  Because who would want to say,  this is Micheal he sort of is family.  We have a conservatorship to help him out and protect him.  Which he frankly probably needed. You just call him your adopted son.  

I could imagine well intended or bad intended thoughts knowing so little.  You could basically tell me to paint them sinister or good and I could at this stage knowing so little. 

anyway, sounds like the best decision would have been to say no to a movie.  For Oher.  For that family. 

 

Could the Tuohys have adopted Oher once he turned 18?
Yes. According to Tennessee law, “When petitioner seeks to adopt a person who is eighteen years of age or older, only the sworn, written consent of the person sought to be adopted shall be required and no order of reference or any home studies need be issued.”

If the Tuohys would have adopted Oher, the family wouldn’t have had the legal rights to make decisions for him once he turned 18 since he would be a legal adult. That’s unlike a conservatorship where the conservator controls the financial decisions for the ward.

https://theathletic.com/4778704/2023/08/15/michael-oher-conservatorship-blind-side/

Lewis[book author and Sean's high school classmate] said he believed the Tuohy family chose a conservatorship for Oher because the process was quicker than traditional adoption. And they were concerned about the NCAA investigating Oher’s choice to attend the University of Mississippi, where the Tuohys were boosters.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2023/08/16/michael-lewis-blind-side-lawsuit/

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

Could the Tuohys have adopted Oher once he turned 18?
Yes. According to Tennessee law, “When petitioner seeks to adopt a person who is eighteen years of age or older, only the sworn, written consent of the person sought to be adopted shall be required and no order of reference or any home studies need be issued.”

If the Tuohys would have adopted Oher, the family wouldn’t have had the legal rights to make decisions for him once he turned 18 since he would be a legal adult. That’s unlike a conservatorship where the conservator controls the financial decisions for the ward.

https://theathletic.com/4778704/2023/08/15/michael-oher-conservatorship-blind-side/

Lewis[book author and Sean's high school classmate] said he believed the Tuohy family chose a conservatorship for Oher because the process was quicker than traditional adoption. And they were concerned about the NCAA investigating Oher’s choice to attend the University of Mississippi, where the Tuohys were boosters.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2023/08/16/michael-lewis-blind-side-lawsuit/

 

 

 

gotcha.   

I mean, unless there is something there not seen....I don't think the conservatorship was about them trying to enrich themselves.  Sounds like they had f you money.   

Doing it so he could go to Ole Miss?  that part is just going to sit weird.  I would think once that became an area of some concern.  The proper thing would have been to of steered Oher elsewhere.  Because that's the part that looks the worse.  Not them making money but the look of them wanting to help their college football team.   And traditionally, that what big f you booster folks play with. 

and I could see Oher finding out he wasn't legally adopted after thinking he was.....and reacting poorly.  If he went his whole adult life believing it. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, CRA said:

 

gotcha.   

I mean, unless there is something there not seen....I don't think the conservatorship was about them trying to enrich themselves.  Sounds like they had f you money.   

 

Absurdly wealthy people with fug you money still fuging over other people to accumulate even more wealthy is the primary driving force of "the economy". 😂

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Absurdly wealthy people with fug you money still fuging over other people to accumulate even more wealthy is the primary driving force of "the economy". 😂

True, but if I had to pick trying to accumulate wealth vs sending talent to their SEC team in regards to Oher? I’m picking football as what the wealthy boosters would be eyeing in this scenario.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can say that I have defended Canales because I get that they are doing all they can to keep from looking like idiots for drafting Bryce, from the trade up to signing $150m guards to drafting XL and Brooks etc---nothing seems to work.  And Hiring Canales was part of the Bryce Young rehab program, so so he can't really decide to "move on."  That has to come from Morgan and Tepper. Personally, I think Bryce is due for an injury.  He is small, he is not thick, and he has been a LOT more healthy than most any other QB has who has endured so much pressure.  The thing that bothers me is this---Bryce really does not go through his progressions quickly.  He locks on to his presnap read and stays locked onto him for too long--he seems to fail to anticipate the WR/TE's positioning on the play before the cut--for example, if the WR is running a dig and the CB has his back to the inside of the field, he should be open for a second or less just after the cut.  He seems to wait until the cut has been made before deciding, then checking down quickly while moving in the pocket. OL:  There seems to be a lack of communication--is that on Mays?  Watch this team presnap--they seem a bit confused at times.   I can almost predict the success rate of the play by watching the center and QB before the snap.  
    • Anyone else remember back in 2010 when Fox piloted having music under the in-game replays during one of Carolina's games? Not the commercial bumpers but the actual replay clips that the announcers would talk over. Pretty sure it was vs the 49ers. And it was terrible. Point being, Carolina continues being so bad that we get the networks trying things out during their games.
    • Is it bad I found this video more hilarious than pathetic? I am still laughing at that one play where half the people on the field ran into each other and Bryce still couldn't see Chuba wide open... Also laughing at Cade blocking nobody and somehow losing his cleat Man this offense is a poo show
×
×
  • Create New...