Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

This may not be thread worthy but…


The Question
 Share

Recommended Posts

I think we should be very excited about Jamie Robinson. After watching film…

-Impeccable tackler

-Hard hitter

- PERFECT timing with hits in pass coverage, he is great at laying the wood at the exact right time to cause incompletions 

- High energy

- Good at jumping snaps and knowing where to be when and how to get to the ball.

 

He reminds me of a Jeremy Chinn without being liability in coverage, and that’s no disrespect to Chinn but I’d rather have him close to the line in the box. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s wild that some people here have said the opposite and wanted him cut. 
 

Not that their take is wild, just wild that two people can watch the same player, with one loving what they see, and the other thinking he’s trash. 
 

I liked what I’ve seen so far. He has a compact heaviness when he tackles somebody. Some might call it “having that dawg in him.”

 

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw nothing from him in preseason to be excited about. In some instances I saw a worse version of what I saw at South Carolina. Liability in coverage (huge TD he lost tracking on before half against Lions) and lost in run support (embarrassing effort against Jets where Smith was trashing him on the broadcast).

Edited by therealmjl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, RenoCarolina said:

not to be that guy but his name is Jammie

Coaches had to be impressed because we let some good guys go.

I knew it was Jammie and even stuck it in my head and still messed up haha. Alas, with research I’m kinda pumped about Stephen Sullivan, and if Derek Wright made the 53 they must like him. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Question said:

It’s just opinions man, I could be completely wrong but I just like what I see in his college stuff. He seems like he’s got grit and smart. What more can you ask for?

I’m not a Corral hater. I like the dude and want him to do well. I think he was terrible in the first preseason game (not all on him though) but he’s gotten a bit better since. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Carl Spackler said:

I’m not a Corral hater. I like the dude and want him to do well. I think he was terrible in the first preseason game (not all on him though) but he’s gotten a bit better since. 

i would love to be wrong about jammie. right now i think he is trash. if he shows out this season i'll think he is eric weddle 2.0

 

that's the beauty of being a fan

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...