Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football 2023

jayboogieman

By jayboogieman,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, carpanfan96 said:

I think he's lost the coaches that made him as good as he was and he hasn't been able to replace them but I do agree it would be silly to fire him. I just won't be surprised if it happens 

Well, I don’t disagree.  But that’s why I was excited for this year and Garett Riley.   But that was horrible on Riley’s part.  That’s the worst Cade has looked.  Maybe it’s Dabo putting his thumb print on it.  It sure did seem DJUish.  The design and asks of the QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, OceanPanther said:

I’d love that,, but Sabin is the same age as Mack and Alabama would come looking too 

I’m not sure Dabo would want to follow up Saban.  It would basically be like a coach signing up to follow Dabo.   You aren’t going to look good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, CRA said:

Well, I don’t disagree.  But that’s why I was excited for this year and Garett Riley.   But that was horrible on Riley’s part.  That’s the worst Cade has looked.  Maybe it’s Dabo putting his thumb print on it.  It sure did seem DJUish.  The design and asks of the QB. 

That's what I think as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Not really.

Its one ACC team beating another.  And if Clemson isn't that good, they weren't going to challenge for the championship anyway.  

No but they would have counted as a quality win for FSU if FSU has the season they hope for.  Clemson is really the only one on the schedule for FSU.  So it robbed them of claiming 2 wins against top 10 teams.   Clemson is really the only team in the ACC with real weight to their name.   And the only ranked opponent FSU will likely see.  Someone might sneak into the bottom of the top 25 I guess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The offensive concerns are legit. Once again Clemson has a starting QB that had shown promise prior to being named the starter only to look like he's forgotten how to play QB once he becomes the full-time starter.

and these are also 5 star super gets by Clemson.  So it’s not just they are just making QBs look bad.  They are making top tier prospects look like they belong in D3. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

It just seems like something is happening at Clemson that they're losing confidence in their QB and in turn killing the confidence of their QB. The play calling tonight screamed they didn't trust Klubnik throwing the ball and he never looked comfortable out there to my eyes.

I mean, these are kids but they're not dumb. They've been playing and watching football their whole lives. They know when the play caller isn't showing confidence in them and that's gotta effect your head.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted

Well, I’ll just be a super homer.  If you were going to lose a game,  week 1 is the week to do it.  Clemson dropping a game to an unranked ACC team isn’t something  we haven’t seen before.  I’ll just be delusional and think they got time time fix it and the QB/OC can grow and get better.   10-3 still on the table and keeping the double win streak alive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
44 minutes ago, SCMunnerlyn1 said:

The New$pring advantage is gone. 

So now what do you do?

Clemson has the most talented roster in the ACC.   And these are some of the best QB prospects any team in the nation can land.  Whatever the talent advantage has been is still in play. 

Clemson has really one issue.  It’s the passing game.  Everything else is in place and has been.  And it’s clearly a coaching/scheme issue.  Because it’s 5 star QBs looking like D3 backups.   Got to think it’s Dabo thumbprint of how they are managing the QB/pass game.   It’s all the same offense on repeat even with Riley, 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...