Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football 2023


jayboogieman
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

To be fair, DJ was in the impossible position of following the man the myth the legend Trevor Lawrence. Always a tough situation in sports to be the guy who comes after “the guy”

It makes Drake Maye even more impressive. Howell was him at UNC. We have GOT to capitalize this year on having five consecutive years of elite QB play. We've never had that before. We have the best two QBs we've ever had back to back.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Martin said:

I only watched 2-3 Clemson games last year and he was really bad in all of them. Couldn’t handle the pressure, bad accuracy etc. What games did you watch where he was “pretty damn good”?

He looked like the worst QB in college football in the ACC CG before getting yanked.

With that said, I never understood Clemson's play calling with him. They insisted on running him like they had Lawrence previously and Klubnik currently. But DJ is not a runner. He's a classic big bodied, big armed pocket passer. He's not a Bledsoe type statue but he's not a guy you should be dialing up designed runs for on the regular.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He's an ideal college coach though. Great recruiter and motivator, but not the type of Xs and Os guy that the NFL is going to be clamoring after. Well, unless Tepper gets infatuated I guess 

Season 2 Lol GIF by Insecure on HBO
 

Did you watch his reactions on the sidelines? Probably why his team quit in the final quarter, hell coach gave up after that last fumble.
The lack of effort on that last TD run by Duke was embarrassing to watch, guys on Defense jogging and avoiding contact. But Dabo doesn’t take ownership of an ill prepared team or take an asswhipping like a man… he uses the word “odd” to describe a loss, like he doesn’t understand how over 400 yds total offense results in 7 points. Well maybe someone should show him his reactions, pretty much self explanatory.
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, weyco2000 said:

Season 2 Lol GIF by Insecure on HBO
 

Did you watch his reactions on the sidelines? Probably why his team quit in the final quarter, hell coach gave up after that last fumble.
The lack of effort on that last TD run by Duke was embarrassing to watch, guys on Defense jogging and avoiding contact. But Dabo doesn’t take ownership of an ill prepared team or take an asswhipping like a man… he uses the word “odd” to describe a loss, like he doesn’t understand how over 400 yds total offense results in 7 points. Well maybe someone should show him his reactions, pretty much self explanatory.
 

Dabo always bitches and moans on the sidelines and acts like the refs are conspiring against his team. But you don't have the success that he's had without doing a lot of things right along the way. I don't think Dabo is a great game day coach, but he is a helluva recruiter and motivator. He's basically a better version of Mack Brown in that regard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He looked like the worst QB in college football in the ACC CG before getting yanked.

With that said, I never understood Clemson's play calling with him. They insisted on running him like they had Lawrence previously and Klubnik currently. But DJ is not a runner. He's a classic big bodied, big armed pocket passer. He's not a Bledsoe type statue but he's not a guy you should be dialing up designed runs for on the regular.

He just seemed to struggle a lot with his processing when under any kind of pressure. But I’m sure the caches did Jim few favors.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I was about to say, Clemson fans gotta be at least a tad nervous that here is another QB that looked really promising in spot duty as a freshman looking pretty trashy as the anointed starter.

It is obvious their receivers are not the premier receivers we have become accustomed to at Clemson. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Clemson certainly has a very talented roster but that didn't look like a typical Clemson roster last night. Usually they are very obviously head and shoulders more talented, athletic, and stronger than the other team. It just looks like men against boys. I didn't see that last night. Duke looked like they belonged on the field athletically and physically with Clemson. That's honestly more shocking to me than the outcome of the game.

Duke heating Clemson should look and feel flukey. That didn't look and feel flukey. 

Also, UNC has really made it a point to go hard for in state recruits and has severed that pipeline to other schools. Pretty much what Carolina is doing in Va, which has really effected Va Tech and UVA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Stuart Smith said:

Clemson imploded with the mistakes. No, they did not look like a Trevor Lawrence team. However, not scoring twice from the one yard changed the whole complexion of this game. 

So did Duke muffing a punt giving you a free red zone trip. Clemson shot themselves in the foot a lot with two blocked FGs and two redzone turnovers but give them those two FGs plus two TDs on the fumbles and you're still at only 27 points with 7 points off of a free trip to the redzone. That would've been good for 74th in the nation in scoring last year. And that's basically being as generous as possible with the potential scoring opportunities last night.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

So did Duke muffing a punt giving you a free red zone trip. Clemson shot themselves in the foot a lot with two blocked FGs and two redzone turnovers but give them those two FGs plus two TDs on the fumbles and you're still at only 27 points with 7 points off of a free trip to the redzone. That would've been good for 74th in the nation in scoring last year. And that's basically being as generous as possible with the potential scoring opportunities last night.

Yeah not to mention the “odd” decision with 4 seconds left in the first half to not attempt a FG by a kicker who Dabo has said has the strongest leg he’s ever coached and has hit from 70… naaaah let’s just throw this little hook to end the half because we forgot our ladder. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, weyco2000 said:

Season 2 Lol GIF by Insecure on HBO
 

Did you watch his reactions on the sidelines? Probably why his team quit in the final quarter, hell coach gave up after that last fumble.
The lack of effort on that last TD run by Duke was embarrassing to watch, guys on Defense jogging and avoiding contact. But Dabo doesn’t take ownership of an ill prepared team or take an asswhipping like a man… he uses the word “odd” to describe a loss, like he doesn’t understand how over 400 yds total offense results in 7 points. Well maybe someone should show him his reactions, pretty much self explanatory.
 

at least Dabo wasn't blaming the chain gang for eating a hotdog at halftime as the reason he lost. 

one of my favorite parts of Gamecock fans that have complained about Dabo all these years as a whinner.....is Shane Beamer is worse than Dabo.  Hard to find someone after a loss that looks worse than Beamer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No you dont.  He had all those records for years before his final season. Whether career or season he had them all years before his final season in which he played 6 games.
    • Williams covered for Moore by saying they were on the wrong page about Moores specific route. Williams could have easily covered for him by saying he messed up. Suggesting only 1 route was ever intended to be a viable target is absurd.
    • I am going to agree with Linville this time--I think we need to get a veteran edge (We have Jones II, Scourton, and Princely--2 developmental guys and a decent veteran).  We don't really think of Jones because he had a hamstring injury weeks 3 and 4 and a back that required surgery Week 6-17.  He still managed 10 pressures, and he will be 28.  Princely Umanmielen only played in approximately 18-20% of the snaps and he struggled at times.  Basically, he was a situational pass rusher.  He got 1.5 sacks and 10 pressures.  He should improve, but for now, he is what he is.  Scourton gives us hope.  For a rookie (and thanks to Jones II's injuries, he was given more PT), he had 8 sacks--and held the edge.  He played at a first-round draft pick level.  He has the potential to become "that guy" in 2026. We lose Wonnum, who played nearly 700 snaps and amassed 3 whole sacks.  For a person raised a Gamecock, I would not be upset if we purged our roster of all South Carolina alumni.   However, I see it this way:  Wonnum was decent holding the edge, something Patrick Jones II and Scourton have demonstrated at a high level.  He is a liability, if you ask me.    Jones had 7 sacks one season in Minnesota and is known for his inside rushing ability--not what you would call a speed rusher.  I think Princely was a bit disappointing, but he was a bit raw.  Out of college, they described him as being a bit predictable.  I see no reason he will not improve in 2026 and become a situational pass rusher.   Basically, with Scourton and Princely expected to continue to develop and Jones II returning from injury, I think we need another veteran (if we can get a good one) to give us balance and depth.  A third developmental player is not ideal.   Draft:  OT, LB, WR, OL depth, S. Free Agency:  Edge, possibly a WR;  re-sign Mays, Cuhran, BC (??), and Nijman.  Let walk:  Wonnum, Scott, Dowdle.  I see about $20m per year after signing the OL depth.  Spend it on a veteran edge.   Players like Reddick (Tampa), Bosa (Buffalo), Khalil Mack (LAC) could be available on a one or two year deal in the $15m range.  We could splurge here, but I think a veteran situational pass rusher (depending on Jones II's back) is all we need while our 2 young guns develop.    
×
×
  • Create New...