Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers and Brian Burns not at all close to extension


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

29 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

And just like clockwork kupp is out for a quarter of the season.    Unreal.   

And Stafford has spinal problems. We legitimately would have gotten TWO top 5 draft picks AND a early 2nd rounder😬

That trade denial will go down as one of the biggest flubs, ESPECIALLY if they don't even sign Burns lol Total incompetence

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CRA said:

There is  just a reality.   Justin Jefferson and DJ Moore are in different tiers.   That doesn’t Moore isn’t a 1 or great. 

Brian Burns is in a different tier than Bosa.  Just like Chubb is.  Or Reddick is.  And the contracts do and should reflect it.  Which is that guaranteed money and that gigantic gap isn’t just creative contract wording. 
 

The problem with the way you're putting it is that it only works  that way when looking at everything individually, not the collective.

There are only so many players at every level, for example, let's say each position really only has 3 truly ELITE players, then each position has another 7 great players, another 10 really really good, another 10 that are pretty good, etc, etc.

Yes, in a vacuum and when looked at individually, only those 3 elite players in a position group should get that very top end money, then a step down for the next 7, another step down for the next 10, and even within those groups there is a sliding scale of course.

When the options are overpaying for someone in that second level or not having anyone in the Top 25 of a position, teams overpay because it's better than the alternative.  Sure, sometimes you can pass on the overpay and use the same money towards 2 other players who can be more effective for you than the 1, but that's not always the case.

When you have someone with Burns' upper end potential, you overpay to keep him because it's better than the alternative of losing him.

As the saying goes, sometimes a bird in the hand is worth 2 in the bush

Edited by tukafan21
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

No one will freak if Fitt does a good contract. They would celebrate it.  But Fitt worked himself into a bad negotiating corner.   Because we have a bad front office. 

 

See, that's the thing. You have no clue what Burns is asking for. But that doesn't stop you from taking the negative approach.

 

I can't believe how quickly you go straight to negative. No stopping at reasonable. It's either rosey or gone straight to pot with you.

 

I am not doing it anymore. There is enough negativity. I don't need it, and don't want it.

 

We have thousands of members. Go be negative with them. I'm sure you'll find some kindred spirits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gerry Green said:

 

See, that's the thing. You have no clue what Burns is asking for. But that doesn't stop you from taking the negative approach.

 

I can't believe how quickly you go straight to negative. No stopping at reasonable. It's either rosey or gone straight to pot with you.

 

I am not doing it anymore. There is enough negativity. I don't need it, and don't want it.

 

We have thousands of members. Go be negative with them. I'm sure you'll find some kindred spirits.

It’s not negative.  It’s just football talk.  You have proven time and time again you are too emotionally invested in all things Panther IMO.   I’m not.  They just give me something to bullshit about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

See, that's the thing. You have no clue what Burns is asking for. But that doesn't stop you from taking the negative approach.

 

I can't believe how quickly you go straight to negative. No stopping at reasonable. It's either rosey or gone straight to pot with you.

 

I am not doing it anymore. There is enough negativity. I don't need it, and don't want it.

 

We have thousands of members. Go be negative with them. I'm sure you'll find some kindred spirits.

I've disagreed with CRA on some posts here today, but this isn't one of them.

There is no way to frame this situation without the realization that Fitterer screwed himself on these negotiations, regardless of what Burns is asking for.  He turned down 2 first round picks for him, it became public, and now we're 22 hours away from the season kicking off and it's not even known yet if Burns is going to be willing to play.

He should have either made that trade, worked out an extension with Burns before turning the trade down, traded him before/during the draft, or signed him LONG before now.

Letting it get to this point, no matter what he's asking for, has put Fitterer in a downright terrible negotiating position, it really doesn't get much worse.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Castavar said:

And Stafford has spinal problems. We legitimately would have gotten TWO top 5 draft picks AND a early 2nd rounder😬

That trade denial will go down as one of the biggest flubs, ESPECIALLY if they don't even sign Burns lol Total incompetence

Eh, I get what you're saying as that's the current situation, but it's also a bit of a revisionist history by judging only from where things stand currently.

A big part of the reason the Rams are even in the position they are right now, looking at a potential Top 5 pick, is because they own their own pick next year for the first time in years.

If we made that trade last year and they still had 2 more years without their Firsts, it's a guaranteed certainty that their offseason plays out entirely differently.  They'd have kept Ramsey and pulled a Saints offseason by working cap magic to kick the can down the road and put a more competitive team on the field this season, no question about it.

They went into this season likely telling themselves that if they had a hot start, they'd use those draft picks to trade for players at the deadline (like maybe a Mike Evans) and if they didn't, they'd stay status quo and end up with a high draft pick.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

I've disagreed with CRA on some posts here today, but this isn't one of them.

There is no way to frame this situation without the realization that Fitterer screwed himself on these negotiations, regardless of what Burns is asking for.  He turned down 2 first round picks for him, it became public, and now we're 22 hours away from the season kicking off and it's not even known yet if Burns is going to be willing to play.

He should have either made that trade, worked out an extension with Burns before turning the trade down, traded him before/during the draft, or signed him LONG before now.

Letting it get to this point, no matter what he's asking for, has put Fitterer in a downright terrible negotiating position, it really doesn't get much worse.

 

Agree to disagree. Fitt ain't going anywhere. This is the first year of a whole new team. It could go right, and Fitt is lauded. It could go wrong, but no one sees that coming. We'll see. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

See, that's the thing. You have no clue what Burns is asking for. But that doesn't stop you from taking the negative approach.

 

I can't believe how quickly you go straight to negative. No stopping at reasonable. It's either rosey or gone straight to pot with you.

 

I am not doing it anymore. There is enough negativity. I don't need it, and don't want it.

 

We have thousands of members. Go be negative with them. I'm sure you'll find some kindred spirits.

Guaranteed money is always the hang up in these contracts because it's the only number that really matters. 

He could sign a $750m 5 year contract with 0 guaranteed, shred his knee game 1 and get cut the next day with zero penalties. If he's got 100m guaranteed, he gets 100m no matter what. That's why that's always the sticking point. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gerry Green said:

 

Agree to disagree. Fitt ain't going anywhere. This is the first year of a whole new team. It could go right, and Fitt is lauded. It could go wrong, but no one sees that coming. We'll see. 

This is a completely irrelevant post to the discussion at hand though.

The question is whether Fitt put himself in a terrible place from a negotiation stand point or not, and there is literally no way of framing where things stand right now without that answer being a resounding yes.

Sure, maybe it works out, but he's the one who put himself behind the 8 ball on this particular negotiation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

I've disagreed with CRA on some posts here today, but this isn't one of them.

There is no way to frame this situation without the realization that Fitterer screwed himself on these negotiations, regardless of what Burns is asking for.  He turned down 2 first round picks for him, it became public, and now we're 22 hours away from the season kicking off and it's not even known yet if Burns is going to be willing to play.

He should have either made that trade, worked out an extension with Burns before turning the trade down, traded him before/during the draft, or signed him LONG before now.

Letting it get to this point, no matter what he's asking for, has put Fitterer in a downright terrible negotiating position, it really doesn't get much worse.

Yep, just isn’t debatable.  Fitt has the Panthers in a horrible position on this Burns deal. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Guaranteed money is always the hang up in these contracts because it's the only number that really matters. 

He could sign a $750m 5 year contract with 0 guaranteed, shred his knee game 1 and get cut the next day with zero penalties. If he's got 100m guaranteed, he gets 100m no matter what. That's why that's always the sticking point. 

 

I get what guaranteed money does. I'm just saying that we have no clue what Burns is asking. So there is no reason for all the vitriol being thrown at Brian this week. It's premature, and uncalled for. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

This is a completely irrelevant post to the discussion at hand though.

The question is whether Fitt put himself in a terrible place from a negotiation stand point or not, and there is literally no way of framing where things stand right now without that answer being a resounding yes.

Sure, maybe it works out, but he's the one who put himself behind the 8 ball on this particular negotiation.

Pretty much. How's he handled this is a crash course in what not to do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...