Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Chris Simms on Bryce Young


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Daniel Mullaly said:

Bryce looked like he could be The Guy and that’s enough for me to be happy. He didn’t look inept, that’s for sure, which is more than we’ve had behind center in a few years. I’m willing to lose a few while he learns and gets some more weapons around him. 

This exactly

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

I just don't buy that Chark singlehandedly changes the outlook of the game like that.  He's a great player, but we also have Smith-Marsette who is regarded as a "take the top off guy" and wasn't utilized.  And as I mentioned yesterday, both TMJ and Mingo beat their guys over the top and Bryce missed both of them.

I didn't play QB in the NFL, but Simms has been wrong before too, and I just was not impressed in the least bit with what I saw.  As I said before, Bryce has to rely greatly on his supporting cast to be effective, but when he's also missing throws to that supporting cast that are essentially layups, then it just further cancels out any positives he possesses.  Again, it's why I preferred AR because he doesn't need other players to win a game bc he can make plays on his own and outs a ton of pressure on defense with his tendency to run.  

Not trying to trash Bryce...  I'm still hoping for the best, but I didn't think he was the right guy, and yesterday did nothing to alleviate that concern.

I obviously disagree with your general sentiment, but I understand.

The only thing I'll argue is that one player can make a huge difference depending upon how effective that he is, but I think that coaching and play calling can even make a bigger difference when players are missing. That didn't happen yesterday.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Car123 said:

What’s Ted Ginn jr. up to? 

 

25 minutes ago, top dawg said:

I obviously disagree with your general sentiment, but I understand.

The only thing I'll argue is that one player can make a huge difference depending upon how effective that he is, but I think that coaching and play calling can even make a bigger difference when players are missing. That didn't happen yesterday.

I agree that a Tedd Ginn Jr. forces defenses to respect the deep ball. He was a 50/50 catch guy but you had to respect his speed every play. A safety had to stay over the top because your CB was not gonna be able to run with him if he was within 10 yards of the LOS. 

Bates wouldn't have had the option of cheating up if there was a guy that made him stay deep. Hopefully Chark can fill that role. If not, then the FO needs to find that guy. Even Byrd would have helped yesterday. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Care to elaborate why you disagree? We kicked the ball off 3 times and we kept the Browns to starting field position of the 22, 27, and 10 (would have been 21 before a penalty). All 3 of those are successes with the modern kickoff rule.
    • Its August so obviously quality options are not there. The question is whether any improvement can be made to the bottom of the depth chart.
    • NFL has a huge amount of parity.  The talent level between most NFL starters outside of the top 5 to 10 guys at a position is very comparable.  2020 worst teams Jacksonville Jaguars - 1-15 (worst record in NFL) New York Jets - 2-14 Cincinnati Bengals - 4-11-1 Atlanta Falcons - 4-12 Houston Texans - 4-12 Carolina Panthers - 5-11 Detroit Lions - 5-11 Philadelphia Eagles - 4-11-1 Los Angeles Chargers - 7-9 Denver Broncos - 5-11 2024 Worst teams New York Giants - 3-14 (tied for worst) Cleveland Browns - 3-14 (tied for worst) Tennessee Titans - 3-14 (tied for worst) New England Patriots - 4-13 Carolina Panthers - 5-12 Jacksonville Jaguars - 4-13 Las Vegas Raiders - 4-13 New York Jets - 5-12 Chicago Bears - 5-12 Arizona Cardinals - 8-9 Bengals, Texans, Lions, Eagles, Broncos and the Jags have all made the the playoffs in the last 3 years. What I'm saying is it's stupid to argue when team is the worst when there is so much parity and the system allows quick turnarounds.    
×
×
  • Create New...