Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reich Press Conference: Week 1


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

The Falcons had no problem with the dink and dunk passing attack. I think Ridder only had one completion over 20 yards himself, the one to Pitts.

Entirely turnovers were the difference. 
 

Just one of those games where every mistake we made was a turnover, and every time the falcons put the ball on the ground, it bounced back to them. 
 

Ridder had problems and looked terrible out there. If he was our QB we would be feeling awful right now even with the W.

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

The Falcons had no problem with the dink and dunk passing attack. I think Ridder only had one completion over 20 yards himself, the one to Pitts.

Yeah , the difference was turnovers.  We moved the ball better, just can’t have 3 turnovers and expect to win.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a side note, what is with all the hammy issues around the Leauge?  Do the trainers not really enforce pregame/pre-practice stretching anymore?  Sure they go through the motions, but are they really stretching.  I remember my track coach busting our balls for not stretching properly, especially the sprinters.  He knew they were the most likely to pull a hammy and watched them close during warm ups to ensure they actually stretched properly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Entirely turnovers were the difference. 
 

Just one of those games where every mistake we made was a turnover, and every time the falcons put the ball on the ground, it bounced back to them. 
 

Ridder had problems and looked terrible out there. If he was our QB we would be feeling awful right now even with the W.

Yes, Ridder did look timid, but in that timidness took what we gave him.  Don't get me wrong, I think Ridder sucks, but the dink and dunk game can be effective even in it's boring simplicity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

On a side note, what is with all the hammy issues around the Leauge?  Do the trainers not really enforce pregame/pre-practice stretching anymore?  Sure they go through the motions, but are they really stretching.  I remember my track coach busting our balls for not stretching properly, especially the sprinters.  He knew they were the most likely to pull a hammy and watched them close during warm ups to ensure they actually stretched properly.

yeah, there was like 8 hammy injuries yesterday... pretty wild. I believe that comes out to about 5% of the league had a hammy injury yesterday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

On a side note, what is with all the hammy issues around the Leauge?  Do the trainers not really enforce pregame/pre-practice stretching anymore?  Sure they go through the motions, but are they really stretching.  I remember my track coach busting our balls for not stretching properly, especially the sprinters.  He knew they were the most likely to pull a hammy and watched them close during warm ups to ensure they actually stretched properly.

No disrespect, but I am pretty sure NFL players do far more stretching and training than you ever have. Again no disrespect because they have definitely done far more stretching and training than me too.

Hamstring injuries happen because playing a 60-minute full-speed football game for the first time in months ain't easy.  This is the case every Week 1, it has nothing to do with trainers not emphasizing stretching.  Same reason you see guys get dehydrated every Week 1 too, although with all the rain it wasn't as much of a problem this year.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

On a side note, what is with all the hammy issues around the Leauge?  Do the trainers not really enforce pregame/pre-practice stretching anymore?  Sure they go through the motions, but are they really stretching.  I remember my track coach busting our balls for not stretching properly, especially the sprinters.  He knew they were the most likely to pull a hammy and watched them close during warm ups to ensure they actually stretched properly.

stretching doesn't prevent hamstring strains, like someone said above, Horn didn't do too much during the preseason and then was going all out in week 1. it takes time for muscles to adapt to heavy workload.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mage said:

No disrespect, but I am pretty sure NFL players do far more stretching and training than you ever have. Again no disrespect because they have definitely done far more stretching and training than me too.

Hamstring injuries happen because playing a 60-minute full-speed football game for the first time in months ain't easy.  This is the case every Week 1, it has nothing to do with trainers not emphasizing stretching.  Same reason you see guys get dehydrated every Week 1 too, although with all the rain it wasn't as much of a problem this year.

Injuries happen all season, but to my recollection, I can't remember this many hammy injuries even for week 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Yes, Ridder did look timid, but in that timidness took what we gave him.  Don't get me wrong, I think Ridder sucks, but the dink and dunk game can be effective even in it's boring simplicity.

I think their coach, who came from the Titans, has brought over some of the same concepts. Run centric, game manager qb, ball control.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Dave Gettleman's Shorts said:

stretching doesn't prevent hamstring strains, like someone said above, Horn didn't do too much during the preseason and then was going all out in week 1. it takes time for muscles to adapt to heavy workload.

I used to go to Panthers camp every year until recently and yes, some dudes don't take stretching seriously.  Maybe it was just at camp.  While stretching doesn't prevent hammy injuries, it sure does lessen the risk of one.  If coaches are letting these guys go into week 1 without going full speed at least some reps during camp or preseason, that's on the coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
    • Bro I don't mind debating you, but did you really have to write all that to get your point across.   This isn't Madden. If you have the #1 pick you literally control your own destiny. If nobody wants to trade which I have a hard time believing they won't then you obviously take the best QB.   I think we will have suitors. If that's Madden then so be it.
×
×
  • Create New...