Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What has Scott Fitterer done right?


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Martin said:

We have 100 threads about what he’s done wrong, so adding yet another list in a thread trying talking about some of the bright spots is odd. 

I think it was more of a backhanded criticism thread. And there aren’t many  bright spots associated with anyone who’s been in charge of this team for the previous 5 seasons. That includes Fitterer’s poo sandwich general management. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since no one has attempted to identify what Fitterer has done right after 9 pages, I'll throw a couple of things out there.  

1. The draft picks from 2021 and 2022 were "developed" with sub-par coaching.  No draftee is a completed work but a work in process.  Let's see what a better set of coaches can mold with this clay.

2. Way too early to judge 2023 draftees.  3 are already starting and the other 2 may develop into something.

3. He is drafting studs in the first round.  We've seen what Horn and Icky can do and Young was the consensus best QB out there.  Blaming Fitterer for Horn's injuries is lame - he was never hurt in college.

4. Free agency - He has been hamstrung with huge dead cap hits since he got here.  54m in 2021 (3rd highest), 52m in 2022 (7th highest), and 55m in 2023 (5th highest).  Hard to make a lot of splash signings with 30% of the cap not available.

While he has had a few stinkers (elf and erving), he has signed some solid players that have played well: Luvu, Abdullah, Reddick, Foreman, Corbett, Woods, Hekker, Bozeman, Ionidas.  Jury is out on this year's crop but everyone seemed to like Bell, Tuttle, Dalton, Sanders, Hurst, Williams, Thielen, Chark, Grugier-Hill, Rowe, Byrd, and extending Bozeman.  Maybe we should wait for more than 1 game before declaring the 2023 free agent class a disaster.

It goes without saying (but I'll say it anyway) I think he significantly upgraded the coaching staff around here.  He'll live and die with how successful they are.

5. Trades - obviously a mixed bag here.  He got good value for CMC.  He also got a 7th for Little, and 6th for Bridgewater, a 5th for Daley, and 6th and 7th for Anderson, 7th for Gonzalez - all players that most on here were just wanting to cut.  Gilmore for a 6th and Mayfield for a 5th were good dice rolls.  Jury is out on Shenault and Smith-Marsette trades.  Darnold and Corral were bad values, but I suspect Mr. Scot is right that these moves were probably driven by Rhule.

6. Finally the trade that wasn't.  Trading your best defensive player for a couple of future firsts that looked to be in the 20's did not seem like good value to Fitt.  I wanted him to pull the trigger, but I certainly understand why he didn't.  I'm ok with a fair contract - a bird in the hand etc...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

This is your other tactic, suggesting that the people who say something other than what you believe are just parroting the team narrative, etc.

There have been plenty of times where what I thought happened turned out not to be what happened. No I could have stubbornly (and stupidly) said "nuh uh, I was still right anyway" but that'd be kind of silly.

The bottom line is you believe what you want to believe, facts be damned. You can accuse others of doing it all you want, but in reality that's just to make it easier to justify doing it yourself.

Tepper (and his wife) are the only owners in modern times that attended a qb pro day.  Now you are going to try and tell me with a straight face that they were not involved in any decision making?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

We could have used that draft ammunition this year and next.  Would we have to trade up next year for a QB if we went the weapons route instead drafting Bryce?  Sure, but the loss of future draft stock would have been in 2025 and beyond when the team would be more complete.  I totally get why we were impatient and went QB this draft, losing sucks especially amid roster uncertainty, but I honestly feel we jumped the gun by a season.

I concur, hope it works out in our favor.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Tepper (and his wife) are the only owners in modern times that attended a qb pro day.  Now you are going to try and tell me with a straight face that they were not involved in any decision making?

Watching a pro day doesn't equal telling your people who to draft.

Hell, if I were an owner, I'd go to The Combine , pro days or anything I could. But I'd also be smart enough to know I'm not a professional scout.

(Tepper has said that too)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Watching a pro day doesn't equal telling your people who to draft.

Hell, if I were an owner, I'd go to The Combine , pro days or anything I could. But I'd also be smart enough to know I'm not a professional scout.

(Tepper has said that too)

Now you are reaching........

 

and being compared to Synder is not a good look

 

https://commanderswire.usatoday.com/2023/03/26/mcshay-recalls-when-commanders-owner-daniel-snyder-attended-a-pro-day-robert-griffin-iii-nfl-draft/

 

so again if you truly think the teppers are not involved in decision making then I have a bridge I want to sell you

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Now you are reaching........

 

and being compared to Synder is not a good look

 

https://commanderswire.usatoday.com/2023/03/26/mcshay-recalls-when-commanders-owner-daniel-snyder-attended-a-pro-day-robert-griffin-iii-nfl-draft/

 

so again if you truly think the teppers are not involved in decision making then I have a bridge I want to sell you

What kind of bridge??

Asking for a friend...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Now you are reaching........

and being compared to Synder is not a good look

https://commanderswire.usatoday.com/2023/03/26/mcshay-recalls-when-commanders-owner-daniel-snyder-attended-a-pro-day-robert-griffin-iii-nfl-draft/

so again if you truly think the teppers are not involved in decision making then I have a bridge I want to sell you

Funny you should bring up the Commanders.

Remember after his firing, Jay Gruden told the story about how Daniel Snyder would essentially tell them with the draft picks were?

Tepper has fired two coaches and one GM. The team has also parted ways with a high level executive in Pat Stewart.

Has any one of them come out and made similar accusations about Tepper?

Hell, even inveterate excuse maker Matt Rhule hasn't suggested anything like that.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Mr. Scot said:

Funny you should bring up the Commanders.

Remember after his firing, Jay Gruden told the story about how Daniel Snyder would essentially tell them with the draft picks were.

Tepper has fired two coaches and one GM. The team has also parted ways with a high level executive in Pat Stewart.

Has any one of them come out and made similar accusations about Tepper?

Hell, even inveterate excuse maker Matt Rhule hasn't suggested anything like that.

as a matter of fact yes, ron was told to go 3-4 by tepper in his last year

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

as a matter of fact yes, ron was told to go 3-4 by tepper in his last year

Yeah, that's weak 😄

It's also false given that even per Rivera's own account, Tepper just made a comment like "maybe you could try going 3-4".

He didn't dictate that they switch. And as we all remember by watching, Riviera didn't really switch anyway.

If you want to go from that to saying "he told us who to draft", yeah sure 😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Yeah, that's weak 😄

It's also false given that even per Rivera's own account, Tepper just made a comment like "maybe you could try going 3-4".

He didn't dictate that they switch. And as we all remember by watching, Riviera didn't really switch anyway.

If you want to go from that to saying "he told us who to draft", yeah sure 😁

you asked a question I gave an answer but thats not good enough for you.   You obviously are insanely attached to this issue so your mind is not going to change no matter who shows you anything. 

 

thats cool

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

you asked a question I gave an answer but thats not good enough for you.

thats cool

That's because the answer was dumb 😆

Also find it pretty funny that you're trying to argue Scott Fitterer is a bad GM while also suggesting that it's David Tepper making the picks. If Tepper makes the picks, what does it matter who's the GM?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...