Trade Burns. Pay Luvu.

[hepcat]

Burns should have been traded last season, yet another Scott Fitterer failures. Meanwhile one of Fitterer’s major successes Frankie Luvu has outperformed his contract and has grown into a menacing player. It’s obvious which one to keep and which one to try to get assets in return. 

[1989]

[countryboi]

[Pantherxtreme]

Trade McCaffrey 

Trade Moore

Trade Burns

While they are all in their prime

Now that's the ticket to winning. 

[JawnyBlaze]

Or, hear me out on this one, keep both. 

[Growl]

the first Luvu sack was all Burns.

[travisura]

How many sacks/TFLs does Luvu get if the OL isn't preoccupied with accounting for Burns?

[PappyMay]

what Price would you want to pay Luvu? The top 5 inside backers all make over $18 million then there is a dramatic drop off where the next 5 probably average 9Million . If its in that second tier i'd be all about a long term extension.

[ForJimmy]

If it’s a wash year spent developing Young it’s not a bad idea to trade Burns if you can get good value for him. Luvu should be much cheaper to keep them you can pay a WR like Higgins the contract he wants and also extend Brown (who I think is the most important person on defense). It’s not a terrible idea and someone will overpay for Burns.

[hepcat]

17 minutes ago, Pantherxtreme said:

Trade McCaffrey 

Trade Moore

Trade Burns

While they are all in their prime

Now that's the ticket to winning. 

Burns is the only one on that list that truly made sense to trade. The Rams made a stupid offer last season to get him. 

[KSpan]

18 minutes ago, travisura said:

How many sacks/TFLs does Luvu get if the OL isn't preoccupied with accounting for Burns?

Burns was 1 v 1 most of the game. I'm not sayiing he didn't have an impact becuase he did, if only under the surface since it wasn't on the stat sheet, but the Saints were not generally dedicating extra blockers to him.