Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton on Bryce


CRA
 Share

Recommended Posts

From top to bottom, it’s not set up for him to be successful.   

a person like Bryce could be scarred, just like any other QB could, if thrown to the wolves too early

https://x.com/avl_mike/status/1707123130605715956?s=46&t=f55N0zsNFevD-XGJBWj1-A

https://x.com/kj_wright34/status/1707068331419984077?s=46&t=f55N0zsNFevD-XGJBWj1-A
 

Cam also gives his side on the great preseason debate about his cast vs Bryce’s.   Not even close. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

So he thinks sitting a rookie QB ala Mahommes/Smith in KC is a good idea

Talks about rookies playing that were in a good position to play as rookies.  Gives Russell Wilson as an example.  Setup for early success.  Situation was good. 

it’s the whole good position, bad position narrative.  You can ruin hurt guys by putting them in bad spots.  We are presently not a great situation for Bryce to be successful and grow.   It’s about what they put around him.  What they ask of him as a QB.  

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I remember Reich in one of his pressers over minicamp or possibly during training camp literally bragging about how much he was putting on Bryce's plate and it kind of took me by surprise. 

It doesn't appear that he was exaggerating that statement.

Edited by therealmjl
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

Talks about rookies playing that were in a good position to play as rookies.  Gives Russell Wilson as an example.  Setup for early success.  Situation was good. 

it’s the whole good position, bad position narrative.  You can ruin hurt guys by putting them in bad spots.  We are presently not a great situation for Bryce to be successful and grow.   It’s about what they put around him.  What they ask of him as a QB.  

 

Yeah, Cam doesn't elaborate on this part but KC was already a playoff caliber team when they got Mahomes and still sat him. I think Wilson did legit win his qb competition in Seattle where after like 2 training camp practices Reich said Bryce was the guy

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, DJ feed me moore said:

crazy to think cam only lasted in the league for 9 years.... great times but man it went by too quick! I still think he could play a taysom hill roll if he wanted.

I'd rather not see him play ever again, if he has to imitate Taysom Hill to get on the field.

Edited by UnluckyforSome
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...