Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So is Marshall gonna do something Sunday?


GoobyPls
 Share

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

How many under Wilks?  He showed his potential.  Good route running and ability to high-point and win back shoulder throws...  now he's not being utilized at all.

 

 

All of it was under Wilks - why is that relevant? Dude didn't play until week 5 vs SF and that was one of his games over 3 targets (4 targets and 4 catches for 30 yards), so he has 12 games under Wilks with 24 catches as the de facto #2 receiver playing 65% of the snaps. He is not currently above replacement level and has never shown anything otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KSpan said:

All of it was under Wilks - why is that relevant? Dude didn't play until week 5 vs SF and that was one of his games over 3 targets (4 targets and 4 catches for 30 yards), so he has 12 games under Wilks with 24 catches as the de facto #2 receiver playing 65% of the snaps. He is not currently above replacement level and has never shown anything otherwise.

Ok.  And that was with some fantastic QB play and excellent scheme and playcalling from one Ben McAdoodoo.

Sometimes stats don't tell the whole story.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Ok.  And that was with some fantastic QB play and excellent scheme and playcalling from one Ben McAdoodoo.

Sometimes stats don't tell the whole story.

Come on now, no need for excuse after excuse. Dude just isn't very good. The stats reflect that pretty accurately, as does just watching him.

Edited by KSpan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Come on now, no need for excuse after excuse. Dude just isn't very good. The stats reflect that pretty accurately, as does just watching him.

I dont think he's Jerry Rice incarnate, but I think he could be solid.  He isn't being utilized and neither is the majority of our playmaker on offense.  That's my point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

I dont think he's Jerry Rice incarnate, but I think he could be solid.  He isn't being utilized and neither is the majority of our playmaker on offense.  That's my point.

TMJ better hope he is cut because if he wants to salvage any sort of respectable career then he should go to KC and try to catch on as a 4th WR and maybe get lucky on a few plays with Mahomes throwing him the ball. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Proudiddy said:

Why single out Marshall?  You could literally ask this about any player not named Chark or Thielen bc the offense fuging sucks.  TMJ showed what he could be under Wilks last season...  this poo is Frank and Bryce fault.  Viska, Chuba, Hurst, TMJ, Miles...  they're all victims of this shitty ass scheme and our inability to distribute touches.

He was a second round pick, those other guys we didn’t invest a lot into

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ok fair to judge only his starts.  But you do acknowledge that going from "he's waaaay above league average in a number of categories" to "here's a single stat where he's above league average (not "waaaay") and another where he is exactly at the league average" is a pretty significant backpedal, no?  I'm guessing he's probably in the ~10th range for completion percentage too if we're only looking at starts (I'm too lazy to isolate his starts and do the calculations), so I'll grant you that one too.  But I don't think completion percentage is all that meaningful as a standalone stat if it isn't bolstered by good TD%, Y/A, etc. On that note, for how much people like posting Passing Charts in here (*cough* CRA) - if you peep Shough's passing charts, he hasn't completed a single 20+ yard pass in the past 3 games combined.  His last one was in Week 13 against the Dolphins, which was a single pass of 24 yards.  I just want to be consistent in how we apply our standards - I think it's always been warranted to criticize Bryce for it (even dating back to his rookie season), but do we suddenly not care about that with Shough? And yeah I did acknowledge that Saints' fans have reason to be excited about him and complimented his poise, which is giving my props.  Still not sure I agree that he looks better than a "ton" of QBs nor do I think you or anyone have really demonstrated that.  I think you are generally one of the more reasonable level-headed posters which is why I'm confused at what I consider to be rather hyperbolic language about Shough.
    • I don't disagree with you, but want to point out that Tremble's strong suit has always been blocking. Case and point: on Horn's 25 yard run, he lays down not 1 but 2 nice blocks...and is looking for #3! https://www.panthers.com/video/jimmy-horn-jr-s-25-yard-run-gives-panthers-red-zone-access-on-first-drive
    • It is a popularity contest.  The selection does have meaning though. It is also 1 of the criteria that is considered for the HOF. The game does not have any significance. The team hasn't been to the playoffs in nearly a decade. That's why they don't get primetime national coverage. To the victors go the spoils.
×
×
  • Create New...