Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another hypothetical....


Zod

Recommended Posts

Davidson because I want Meeks to stay where he is.

Agreed plus I want him to have full control of the offense. Most HC want to have there fingers in the Offense. I believe Davidson would allow Meeks to have complete control of the defense. So we win both ways.

And I think Davidson wanted Moore to start or at least Jake to be benched. He was having to become so predictable a caveman could tell what was coming. I dont think he would let him start again but I have no idea what Meeks would do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The offense has proven that they can succeed on sheer talent, often in spite of playcalling. The playcalling has gotten better with a more competent quarterback, but I'm still of the opinion that the offense's success is more a result of player execution than coaching. For the most part, you can't coach what Williams and Stewart do every week. You just let them run loose.

I will, however, credit him with the offensive line's success. It's impressive that in both this year and last we've had backups come in and perform very admirably.

Now, all that being said, we continue to see the defense improve with each game. Can you imagine if earlier in the season Meeks had the good fortune of simply having an offense that wouldn't put the defense in bad spot? We'd easily be looking at a top 10 defense. I won't even get into the injuries.

Meeks it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say hire a special teams coach, promote Crossman and tell him under NO circumstances does he attempt to coach, all he is to do is to make sure his headsets plugged in a couple of time a game, chew gum and clap. :D

Seriously though I like Meeks only because I like smash mouth football and in the past weeks the offense has looked pretty strong, but the defense has played lights out in a short amount of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between the two I would promote Davidson and let him hire Weiss as OC. Make Meeks DC and assistant head coach. Problem solved. Funny the opinions now. When I suggested making Davidson head coach if Fox left a week or two ago, I was lambasted by the Fox and Davidson haters. 5 quarters of good offense and now everything is great. The pendulum swings pretty fast around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between the two I would promote Davidson and let him hire Weiss as OC. Make Meeks DC and assistant head coach. Problem solved. Funny the opinions now. When I suggested making Davidson head coach if Fox left a week or two ago, I was lambasted by the Fox and Davidson haters. 5 quarters of good offense and now everything is great. The pendulum swings pretty fast around here.

I don't think anyone is really suggesting Davidson should be our head coach. Hence the "hypothetical" in the title. It's just an "if given the choice" sort of question.

I still don't think Davidson has shown much, and I think it would be a horrible idea to promote him as head coach. For the record, though, I don't know that Meeks has what it takes either.

I'm of the opinion that coordinators should be promoted after fielding one of the league's best offenses or defenses, preferably for a couple of years at least. I don't think either Davidson or Meeks has done that yet.

Still, I think Meeks has done more with less time here, so I'll go with Meeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...