Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Another hypothetical....


Zod

Recommended Posts

Davidson because I want Meeks to stay where he is.

Agreed plus I want him to have full control of the offense. Most HC want to have there fingers in the Offense. I believe Davidson would allow Meeks to have complete control of the defense. So we win both ways.

And I think Davidson wanted Moore to start or at least Jake to be benched. He was having to become so predictable a caveman could tell what was coming. I dont think he would let him start again but I have no idea what Meeks would do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The offense has proven that they can succeed on sheer talent, often in spite of playcalling. The playcalling has gotten better with a more competent quarterback, but I'm still of the opinion that the offense's success is more a result of player execution than coaching. For the most part, you can't coach what Williams and Stewart do every week. You just let them run loose.

I will, however, credit him with the offensive line's success. It's impressive that in both this year and last we've had backups come in and perform very admirably.

Now, all that being said, we continue to see the defense improve with each game. Can you imagine if earlier in the season Meeks had the good fortune of simply having an offense that wouldn't put the defense in bad spot? We'd easily be looking at a top 10 defense. I won't even get into the injuries.

Meeks it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I say hire a special teams coach, promote Crossman and tell him under NO circumstances does he attempt to coach, all he is to do is to make sure his headsets plugged in a couple of time a game, chew gum and clap. :D

Seriously though I like Meeks only because I like smash mouth football and in the past weeks the offense has looked pretty strong, but the defense has played lights out in a short amount of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between the two I would promote Davidson and let him hire Weiss as OC. Make Meeks DC and assistant head coach. Problem solved. Funny the opinions now. When I suggested making Davidson head coach if Fox left a week or two ago, I was lambasted by the Fox and Davidson haters. 5 quarters of good offense and now everything is great. The pendulum swings pretty fast around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Between the two I would promote Davidson and let him hire Weiss as OC. Make Meeks DC and assistant head coach. Problem solved. Funny the opinions now. When I suggested making Davidson head coach if Fox left a week or two ago, I was lambasted by the Fox and Davidson haters. 5 quarters of good offense and now everything is great. The pendulum swings pretty fast around here.

I don't think anyone is really suggesting Davidson should be our head coach. Hence the "hypothetical" in the title. It's just an "if given the choice" sort of question.

I still don't think Davidson has shown much, and I think it would be a horrible idea to promote him as head coach. For the record, though, I don't know that Meeks has what it takes either.

I'm of the opinion that coordinators should be promoted after fielding one of the league's best offenses or defenses, preferably for a couple of years at least. I don't think either Davidson or Meeks has done that yet.

Still, I think Meeks has done more with less time here, so I'll go with Meeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You would hope so. I’m confused why the sports world seems split on Bryce when he’s obviously not working out. 
    • So let’s do the reverse? Make everyone agree everything he does is a disaster? I also think the whole “gaslighting” is on the eye of the beholder. It went from he can’t avoid one single sack countered with he actually did that well Sunday (with data backing it) to a little breakdown of why he is so bad. People are going to have different opinions. I’m also not going to pretend this wasn’t happening Day one with this little QB. 
    • All this great stuff he has done, how often does he do it?  I have it at three or four games out of 14 where he was very good and then you get a drive here or a series there where there are some good things. Here is the gaslight part: everyone has put him on a curve with his first year the baseline, neglecting to understand how bad he was then. Even if he comes back twice as good, where does that really leave him? 25th ranked or thereabouts.     He had so far to go, and still does, it is a Major ‘settle’ to accept his play as worthy of giving him our future.  You want to settle when the Bucs have Mayfield, and the Saints have overtaken us at QB? We will be third in the division at QB. That is good enough for y’all?  
×
×
  • Create New...