Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Orlovsky with a message to the Huddle

thebdawg

By thebdawg,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

thebdawg Rising Star

thebdawg

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 minutes ago, frankw said:

And? He also thought Sam Darnold was going to be a franchise QB.

This same place once highly regarded Chris Simms opinions on QB's too. Whoever aligns with the narrative is the new popular name.

No Darnold slander allowed. Also no one said Orlovsky is being regarded highly, you sound deranged.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, t96 said:

There were a couple in the Lions game if you were watching. 

After he shook off his 2nd turnover and let loose he look way better and definitely flashed some potential.  He was also passing it down the field.  If we could get that play out of him consistently plus an actual running game things will start looking a lot better.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, frankw said:

And? He also thought Sam Darnold was going to be a franchise QB.

This same place once highly regarded Chris Simms opinions on QB's too. Whoever aligns with the narrative is the new popular name.

It's just another perspective in a sea of people being down on Young/Carolina.  You calling out one of the times he was wrong (as every analyst is at some point) in an attempt to make him less credible would be you trying to spin your narrative on it would it not?  Everyone has a narrative to spin, no one is purely neutral.  

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
frankw Grand Master

frankw

Posted
Posted
Just now, ForJimmy said:

It's just another perspective in a sea of people being down on Young/Carolina.  You calling out one of the times he was wrong (as every analyst is at some point) in an attempt to make him less credible would be you trying to spin your narrative on it would it not?  Everyone has a narrative to spin, no one is purely neutral.  

I am not saying he is entirely without credibility to give an opinion. But if his Sam Darnold takes were just a throwaway remark he made a few times it would be one thing. But it's worth noting since he went all in on Sam. He was outspoken about it. It's worth mentioning in the context of him putting it all on the line for another QB that is under a cloud of skepticism here. We don't have to like it. But it's relevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Proudiddy Grand Master

Proudiddy

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He should elaborate on that. Because he could mean practically anything from fan treatment to media treatment to how he's being utilized in the offense.

This. 

What does "what are some doing to Bryce" even mean?  We're fans.  So unless he's talking about booing, there jsnt anything else we can "do" to him.  I think he's likely alluding to something with the coaching.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Navy_football
      Friday camp news and notes

      By Navy_football · Posted

      Yeah, Bryce has to put that a little deeper. But XL can't allow the pick there. Gotta become the DB when you're undercut like that.
    • TD alt
      Micah officially requests a trade

      By TD alt · Posted

      You see, I just don't subscribe to a cookie cutter type of philosophy when it comes to trades or team building. Every situation is different. Many may disagree, but I think that FOs that can't draft impact-players beyond the first round aren't really viable.  Just for argument's sake, because we all know this hypothetical trade is as realistic as the moon being made of cheese, Micah is a young dawg really just beginning his prime and is arguably the most valuable pass rusher in the league. He could realistically play at a high level for at least the next five to seven years. Parsons' current trajectory is Canton. That being said, he's not some old merc that fits the mold of "one piece away," he's a core piece to any defense for the better part of the next 10 years. Pass rushers of his caliber and age don't generally become available, so, sure, he'd help an elite team, but he's also a fit for a younger team that's building. I know that you don't agree, but it's all good. I respect your rationale.
    • pantherclaw
      Micah officially requests a trade

      By pantherclaw · Posted

      Here's my not important take on this subject.  Who wouldn't want a pass rusher of his consistency?  I would absolutely love to have him on this defense.   Would I give up Brown in a trade for him.  Nope, I would never do that.  Interior linemen are way to important to be settling for whatever you can get at the position.   Would I trade 2 firsts,  plus fork out a big contract for him?   Without knowing if Young is for sure going to be our long term, franchise guy,  there is no way I'd be okay with letting go 2 firsts. As for the contract that he'd demand, I just dont get caught up with NFL contracts.  They have been out of control for decades.  So I really dont get upset over big contracts. It's just a fact of life in the NFL.  You HAVE to pay for talent. 
×
×
  • Create New...