Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Ducks 8:30


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Orlov had an assist and still managed to be a -5 in game where the opponent scored 6 goals… that’s a feat in and of itself.

Ok I missed last nights game. How did burns have 25 minutes? Why was Orlov a -5 but TDA only a -3? How did the top three forward lines give up 2 goals a piece? Holy poo how did orlov give up a -5 with only 15 minutes? 
 

We need chatty in instead of TDA don’t we? 

Edited by Harbingers
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Ok I missed last nights game. How did burns have 25 minutes? Why was Orlov a -5 but TDA only a -3? How did the top three forward lines give up 2 goals a piece? Holy poo how did orlov give up a -5 with only 15 minutes? 
 

We need chatty in instead of TDA don’t we? 

I’d sit Orlov before TDA, he flat out gave up on one play and left Raanta out to dry. His compete level needs to be higher. At least TDA is competing, albeit not particularly well.

Bottom line is Chatfield shouldn’t ever sit again.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I’d sit Orlov before TDA, he flat out gave up on one play and left Raanta out to dry. His compete level needs to be higher. At least TDA is competing, albeit not particularly well.

Bottom line is Chatfield shouldn’t ever sit again.

I mean it sounds like just reading the box score and stats we completely fugged our transition game/line changes. I mean really how does burns have 25 minutes but Slavin just have a cool 19:19? Burns should NOT be having 25 minute games. We need him fresh down the stretch. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

I mean it sounds like just reading the box score and stats we completely fugged our transition game/line changes. I mean really how does burns have 25 minutes but Slavin just have a cool 19:19? Burns should NOT be having 25 minute games. We need him fresh down the stretch. 

Think Burns’ extra minutes came from the PP but yeah the transition game was terrible. I remember multiple 2 on 1’s and 3 on 2’s for the Ducks. I also think we lost too many board battles.

Also Raanta had one, arguably two softy’s. Need our tenders to be better.

On the plus side, Turbo is back to being Turbo, of course it’s in a contract year.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I’d sit Orlov before TDA, he flat out gave up on one play and left Raanta out to dry. His compete level needs to be higher. At least TDA is competing, albeit not particularly well.

Bottom line is Chatfield shouldn’t ever sit again.

I’m hoping Orlov is just pulling a burns but so far he has not been impressive. It’s clear he needs a defensive defenseman to pair with him to cover his mistakes(ala Dougie). That would be chatty. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Kinda glad I ended up busy last night. Though I am looking forward to getting a chance to analyze if we really sucked that bad. Cause the LA and ducks stat lines have been garbage. We shouldn’t have won the LA game. 

We looked bad. Just lower energy than the Ducks. Transition game is still our biggest issue, and getting outworked on top of that absolutely kills you.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Then don't tune in. It's really not a hard concept to understand, if your making your decision based on your own personal needs/feelings as opposed to what is best for the future of the franchise, then it's a you problem, not a Panthers problem. When the season is already lost, every fan should be rooting for the same thing.  The team plays hard until the final whistle of the season and keeps improving as a team and individually, but in the end, we still come up short and lose games, and preferably because the other team beat us, not because we screwed up and found a way to lose due to our own fault. Look at it this way... If we are up 1 or 2 points with 3 seconds left in the game and the other team is lining up for a FG.  Beyond the joy of victory or the disappointment of defeat, what impact does the other team making or missing the FG have on our team the following season? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING Except where we draft and what teams we play due to our finish in the division. The players and coaches on the team would have the exact same level of improvement and learnings about themselves individually and as a team whether the FG is made or missed.  The ONLY difference in the end is the record in the standings and if the win or loss number changes. If you want to argue if making the playoffs to lose in the first round or just missing them is better or worse, that's totally fair and I can at least understand the other side of it.  But in what is already a lost season, if you're not hoping your team plays well but ends up losing, then you're cutting off your nose to spite your face.  You're hoping for a moment of happiness at the detriment of the franchise's future, and in turn, you're basically then happy for a moment to only set yourself up for future further disappointment.
    • If we’re eliminated I want the wins more.   The season is already a disappointment and if I’m not pulling for wins why bother to tune in?
    • Two things terribly wrong with this post. First is that not one time has myself or anyone else agreeing with me said that the team themselves should think that way or try and lose for positioning.  Never once have I suggested the team should purposefully lose games, ever.  I honestly can't understand why people keep saying this in posts, not one fan has ever said the players should or would purposefully try to lose. And second, is yes, that has happened and it's happened very recently.  The 2020 Bengals were 4-11-1 and then were playing in the SB the very next season.   And while it might have been 2 years later and they didn't quite get to the SB, the 2021 Lions were 3-13-1 and then the 2023 Lions were up 24-7 at halftime of the NFC Championship game. The season between those two? They finished 9-8 and only just missed the playoffs. Which is why I keep trying to compare us to the Lions in where we are at in our re-build.  Throw out Bryce's rookie year with the Reich staff who just didn't work out and he looked god awful.   This past season when we were 5-12 in Canales' 1st season is that 2021 season for the Lions and their 1st season under Campbell.  This year is their 2022 where they grew a ton and Campbell's culture building was clear, where I'm saying we'd likely be better off in the long run if we go 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss out on the playoffs (which is still a significant improvement from last year).  Then our 2026 is their 2024 when we have a chance to be a real contender after adding a few more pieces and our key players having another year of experience under their belts.
×
×
  • Create New...