Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Ducks 8:30


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

Back to back or not, on paper this is one we should have no problem winning.

I’d like to see Chatfield anchor the third pairing and only use TDA on the PP.

Bunting - Aho - Jarvis

Teravainen - Kotkaniemi - Necas

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Lemiuex - Noesen

Slavin - Burns

Skjei - Pesce

Orlov - Chatfield

DeAngelo (PP only)

Raanta

Andersen

Extra - Drury

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

Back to back or not, on paper this is one we should have no problem winning.

I’d like to see Chatfield anchor the third pairing and only use TDA on the PP.

Bunting - Aho - Jarvis

Teravainen - Kotkaniemi - Necas

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Lemiuex - Noesen

Slavin - Burns

Skjei - Pesce

Orlov - Chatfield

DeAngelo (PP only)

Raanta

Andersen

Extra - Drury

I so love Aho on our top scoring line.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Raanta being in will benefit our dmen, particularly Orlov who knows he needs to ingratiate himself to all of our goalies. Plus Raanta has a chance to prove he can split more of the load which would obviously benefit Freddie and the team as a whole.

 

Keep out of the box, stop letting the opponent have great chances in transition and we'll be fine. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, lightsout said:

I think Raanta being in will benefit our dmen, particularly Orlov who knows he needs to ingratiate himself to all of our goalies. Plus Raanta has a chance to prove he can split more of the load which would obviously benefit Freddie and the team as a whole.

 

Keep out of the box, stop letting the opponent have great chances in transition and we'll be fine. 

I think mdc is right, orlov is going to have the same learning curve as burns. Except we’ve kinda stacked our offensive D a little heavy. I also agree with who ever said chatty and orlov need to partner. TDA is the real odd man out here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No Chatfield again…

Bunting - Aho - Jarvis

Teravainen - Kotkaniemi - Necas

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Lemiuex - Drury - Noesen

Slavin - Burns

Skjei - Pesce

Orlov - DeAngelo

Raanta

Andersen

Extra - Chatfield

 

I might be in the minority but I’d sit Drury 100 times out of 100 and go 11 and 7 with Chatfield drawing in.

If we’re going to be on the PK damn near ten times then let’s get another defenseman out there that can kill penalties.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

No Chatfield again…

Bunting - Aho - Jarvis

Teravainen - Kotkaniemi - Necas

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Lemiuex - Drury - Noesen

Slavin - Burns

Skjei - Pesce

Orlov - DeAngelo

Raanta

Andersen

Extra - Chatfield

 

I might be in the minority but I’d sit Drury 100 times out of 100 and go 11 and 7 with Chatfield drawing in.

If we’re going to be on the PK damn near ten times then let’s get another defenseman out there that can kill penalties.

I’d sit TDA over Drury. Chatty should be in on the third pair so far TDA has just been a liability. Especially on PP 1 with burns. Burns should be QBing. 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah and I am doubtful he can offer that consistently. I don’t have many years left at my age and in my view we have wasted two and this whole exercise with him was always a three year minimum.  I am out on that with a guy I don’t believe in, and never believed in, it has sucked. To me it is a costly detour off the right track. Years.    But I am not so rigid that I can’t see excellence. He needs to display it though, consistently before I change my outlook.  
    • No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
×
×
  • Create New...