Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If there was a re draft when would Young be taken?


Shotgun
 Share

If there was a re draft when would Young be taken?  

176 members have voted

  1. 1. If there was a re draft when would Young be taken?

    • #1
      24
    • #2-#5
      70
    • Not in the top 10
      35
    • Not in the first round
      47


Recommended Posts

Picking a top QB is a crap shoot and always has been.  There are millions of dollars at stake and teams still get it wrong.  Peyton Manning and Ryan Leaf are the greatest examples.  Both were considered the best in the draft.  One became one of the greatest ever, and the other was the biggest bust ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, top dawg said:

This thread is totally premature, but whatever.

This thread is stupid and shows football fandom has become a instant reaction and not the history studying research entity it use to be.. QBS use to be given more then 6 games before making buyers regret threads.. 

smh

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, recceice said:

This thread is stupid and shows football fandom has become a instant reaction and not the history studying research entity it use to be.. QBS use to be given more then 6 games before making buyers regret threads.. 

smh

Give me some history on 5'10" 185lb (at best, being generous) Quarterbacks? I won't limit it to number one overall selections.

Edited by stratocatter
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

It took drew brees 4 years and a HOF coach to really get it going.  You see that happening here?

Sean Payton is  a Hof coach now??? 
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BreeDr00.htm

Brees 3rd season as a starter in “San Diego” was a good season.. no 4 years no Sean Payton…

Edited by recceice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, recceice said:

Sean Payton is  a Hof coach now??? 
https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/B/BreeDr00.htm

Brees 3rd season as a starter in “San Diego” was a good season.. no 4 years no Sean Payton…

It took Brees 4 years to start playing well.   And it took Sean Payton who is absolutely a HOF coach to build an offense that really utilized his skill set.   
 

again I ask.   You see that happening here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s wild watching some of you guys go from Bryce has to be the pick because he’s the most pro ready QB in the draft to “Hey guys, let’s be patient and let him develop.”

 

if that’s the case y’all should have been on board with picking the players with the most upside and no the alleged highest floor.

Edited by Call Me James
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...