Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Locked On Panthers Trade Deadline Primer with Mike Kaye

jayboogieman

By jayboogieman,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

What's the story there? I haven't seen anything about Fowler and Tepper.

https://www.wccbcharlotte.com/2022/10/11/tepper-gets-testy-with-local-columnist-during-news-conference/

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article267139666.html

 

And for the record Fowler is a complete douche

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

https://www.wccbcharlotte.com/2022/10/11/tepper-gets-testy-with-local-columnist-during-news-conference/

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article267139666.html

 

And for the record Fowler is a complete douche

Thanks. I was completely or nearly completely checked out by that point last year. Seeing if Young develops is the only thing keeping me watching this season.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
Just now, jayboogieman said:

Thanks. I was completely or nearly completely checked out by that point last year. Seeing if Young develops is the only thing keeping me watching this season.

I think in that exchange both parties come off incredibly terrible.  Cuck Fowler knows what he was doing and dumb dumb tepper should be way above but alas here we are

 

But there is a continued common thread that people that cover this team are really hesitant to go full blast.  Ellis, person kaye etc

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jayboogieman Grand Master

jayboogieman

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I think in that exchange both parties come off incredibly terrible.  Cuck Fowler knows what he was doing and dumb dumb tepper should be way above but alas here we are

 

But there is a continued common thread that people that cover this team are really hesitant to go full blast.  Ellis, person kaye etc

The local writers have always been hesitant to go full blast or paint the team in a negative light. I guess the team has always threatened their access or employers to keep them in line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
hepcat Grand Master

hepcat

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

https://www.wccbcharlotte.com/2022/10/11/tepper-gets-testy-with-local-columnist-during-news-conference/

https://www.charlotteobserver.com/sports/nfl/carolina-panthers/article267139666.html

 

And for the record Fowler is a complete douche

So is David Tepper and if you put them in the same room you’ll get a lot of stinky douche smell

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sir Big Spurr Experienced

Sir Big Spurr

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I think in that exchange both parties come off incredibly terrible.  Cuck Fowler knows what he was doing and dumb dumb tepper should be way above but alas here we are

 

But there is a continued common thread that people that cover this team are really hesitant to go full blast.  Ellis, person kaye etc

I finally quit listening to the Roaring Riot podcast with Ellis. He couldn’t make a negative comment without prefacing it with an apology or something positive. It was obvious he was too close to the team to be able to give an honest assessment. I have no use for someone like that who appeases the owner and “positive vibes only” crowd. I haven’t listen to him this season, but I could probably tell you exactly he’s been saying each week. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted

Ugh, listened to the entire thing only to get to the trade remarks at the very end, the only reason I clicked play in the first place.

If there is ANY market for TMJ, D-Jax or Burns, then it should be entertained.  Anyone thinking we are going to go on some miraculous run is delusional.  At best we take 2 of the next 3 games and possibly another couple by season's end.  Again, if 5 wins is the absolute best we can hope for at this point, then we should be in full sell mode. Get as much draft capital as possible and offload the heavy cap burden for the future.

The staff tried to be piece together a veteran team around Bryce and failed.  The new plan should be get young guys to grow along with Bryce.  Yes, that means probably a long 2024 season too, but we tried the alternative and are sitting at 0-6.   Get a young core of players that could make some noise in a couple of years while making strides next year.  That I could live with.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNCrules2187 Mentor

UNCrules2187

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Got a feeling the Lions will be the team that trade for Burns. They have no pass rushers outside of Hutchinson.

 

Maybe we can get 2 1st out of them. They seem like the most likely desperate team to make that kind of move.

 

 

Burns and TMJ or Chark (they'd probably want Chark tbh) for their 2024 1st, 2024 3rd, and Jameson Williams. Get it done. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
45catfan Grand Master

45catfan

Posted
Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Got a feeling the Lions will be the team that trade for Burns. They have no pass rushers outside of Hutchinson.

 

Maybe we can get 2 1st out of them. They seem like the most likely desperate team to make that kind of move.

 

 

Yup, they got handled yesterday too.  If they think a good edge rusher can get their defense off the field, they should pick up the phone.  They have an additional 3rd rounder this draft too.  A 1st and 3rd this year and a 2nd in 2025 (last part of the trade this year) that would work for me.

Edited by 45catfan
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...