Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Official Trade Deadline & Speculation Thread


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

Helped win a Super Bowl now a PS squad player. 

Practice Squad doesn’t mean what it used to now that they changed the rules for it to allow vets on it.

It basically lets you carry extra players on the 53 man roster for 3 weeks

The Rams starting RB the last 2 weeks is also on their PS as you can activate someone from the PS 3 times before you have to make them a full time 53 man roster player

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

Agreed.

 

Still think Sam Darnold would be a better option. He has better arm talent than Purdy imo.

He has more talent for sure but he'd do what he does. Look good for a couple of three games then turn into a turnover machine once the league gets film of him operating in that system. It's been the story of his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He has more talent for sure but he'd do what he does. Look good for a couple of three games then turn into a turnover machine once the league gets film of him operating in that system. It's been the story of his career.

I don't know man that roster is easily the best he would have ever played with. Hell he had us looking decent with Steve Wilks and not much to work with on offense.

 

I think he would kill it with all those weapons and he has a good HC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

He has more talent for sure but he'd do what he does. Look good for a couple of three games then turn into a turnover machine once the league gets film of him operating in that system. It's been the story of his career.

This.

Darnold is who he is and thats not likely to suddenly change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

Montez Sweat traded to the Bears for a 2nd rounder. No chance we get a 1st for Burns.

Really surprised. I mean, Washington was gonna have to choose between him and Young in terms of who to pay but surprised Ron would be willing to trade him when he seems on the hot seat big time and his D is playing like straight trash. That secondary is getting shredded already and their pass rush is the only thing giving them a fighting chance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Really surprised. I mean, Washington was gonna have to choose between him and Young in terms of who to pay but surprised Ron would be willing to trade him when he seems on the hot seat big time and his D is playing like straight trash. That secondary is getting shredded already and their pass rush is the only thing giving them a fighting chance.

There are indications that they're looking at moving Young as well.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...