Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Montez Sweat new deal


jb2288
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

This is why Burns should have already been signed or shipped off when the Rams came calling. They are going to have to pay him way more than he is worth. 

Fitt strkes again, he is absolutely worthless as a Gm and should have been gone when Rhule lelft. 

Hurney was 10x better. 

Sanders would have been signed to a 4 year, 20m per with 79.5 guaranteed. He loved paying RBs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SmokinwithWilly said:

Sanders would have been signed to a 4 year, 20m per with 79.5 guaranteed. He loved paying RBs. 

Doubt it, he probably resigns Foreman to the deal Sanders has now. 

At least Marty drafted all pro/HoF type guys. He often overpaid some as well but hey at least we won every couple of years. 

Edited by PootieNunu
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

24.5M/yr really doesn’t seem too bad. I’d prefer Sweat in a 4-3 over Burns, tbh, and I remember having that same thought on draft day. We’ve been stuck in this weird space with either too many 4-3 players trying to play 3-4 or too many 3-4 players trying to play 4-3 since Ron’s final year when he decided we were going to go hybrid. This franchise been back asswards for so long.

Yep. We've had mismatched tweener personnel as a team for years now.

I honestly think we're a lot closer to fitting a 4-3 currently and it feels like the 3-4 switch might have been largely about maximizing Burns and he still looks the same.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

You can forget that. We have passed on trading him multiple times. He is going to be here. It is just how much money he ends up getting.

My guess is in the $29-32 mil/yr range.

If we don't fire Fitts that's what's gonna happen. He has really painted himself into a corner on this one and forget showing your cards, he's handed the entire deck to Burns' camp. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Doubt it, he probably resigns Foreman to the deal Sanders has now. 

At least Marty drafted all pro/HoF type guys. He often overpaid some as well but hey at least we won every couple of years. 

There’s a reason all the players loved Hurn dog…Although (over)paying your own does have the benefit of maintaining a family like culture that was lost when Gettleman took over 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

If we don't fire Fitts that's what's gonna happen. He has really painted himself into a corner on this one and forget showing your cards, he's handed the entire deck to Burns' camp. 

I think he gave them all our chips too. 

It's one of the most insane things I have ever seen. Gettleman and Hurney could only dream of fuging up a deal this badly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ThrillzforthePils said:

There’s a reason all the players loved Hurn dog…Although (over)paying your own does have the benefit of maintaining a family like culture that was lost when Gettleman took over 

Hurney drafted knockout players in the first which s more than fitt has ever done, IDC how many RBS he overpaid. 

Do I want Hurney back for 3.0? Hell no, but he is better at his job than Fitt is. 

He did have the occasional Norman, Hardy, Kalil late round guys too. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I think he gave them all our chips too. 

It's one of the most insane things I have ever seen. Gettleman and Hurney could only dream of fuging up a deal this badly.

Gettleman would've offered him vet minimum then cut him in a fit of rage fifteen minutes before kickoff of our first game. 😂

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We won 5 with the worst defense in the history of defenses.  I think free agency and our draft puts us over 6.5.
    • Leaning towards just ordering this tonight, but now I have no idea on size. Has anyone bought a bunch of jerseys in the last few years and can convey how the Game vs Limited vs Reebok versions all fit? These are both Mediums... The white one here is a Reebok one from 2010, and was when they had the "+2 length" on the tag and it was the version with the stitched numbers instead of iron on... the blue one is from 2022 and is the F.U.S.E Limited version also with stitched stuff, not the "game jersey" with the ironed on numbers/letters that they have the T-Mac jerseys in. The old one fits me fine, the blue one was always a tad snug on me, particularly in the shoulders I'm leaning going with a Large based on the CMC, but for all I know, that is made with a tighter cut due to the higher "limited" level and the "game" ones they have for T-Mac are cut more like a T-Shirt and thus will fit more like the old white one I have here, not sure. (and yes, I already tried going to a sporting goods store here to hopefully try on a Lions jersey to see, but they don't have any right now)
    • I think there's a ton of potential in that WR room. But they really are unproven right now. Hopefully they live up to the hype.
×
×
  • Create New...