Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

College Football Week 11


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Howell got spanked by the Cowgirls.

 

Not sure why people keep talking about Howell. At his best he's a middle of the pack QB. Saying that he's probably the best UNC QB to play in the NFL which is honestly sad to say.

I mean, he leads the NFL in passing yards and has a worse O-Line than Young and an avg at best offense and is coached by Ron.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Howell got spanked by the Cowgirls.

 

Not sure why people keep talking about Howell. At his best he's a middle of the pack QB. Saying that he's probably the best UNC QB to play in the NFL which is honestly sad to say.

Says the "UNC fan". 😂

Yeah, it was wild how Howell was the only guy out there and single handedly lost.

Howell is leading the NFL in passing yardage on an awful team with a lame duck coach, the worst D in the NFL, and an OC just trying to audition for HC roles vs. trying to run a functional offense. He's about the only thing right about that team.

My point in bringing up Howell is that the Heels would have been utterly awful with our defenses without Howell and Maye at QB. Mack has been floated by getting the two best QBs we've ever had and doing very little in the other side of the ball. I know that's obvious and you're just a troll but figured I'd point that out for anyone who actually cares.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Says the "UNC fan". 😂

Yeah, it was wild how Howell was the only guy out there and single handedly lost.

Howell is leading the NFL in passing yardage on an awful team with a lame duck coach, the worst D in the NFL, and an OC just trying to audition for HC roles vs. trying to run a functional offense. He's about the only thing right about that team.

My point in bringing up Howell is that the Heels would have been utterly awful with our defenses without Howell and Maye at QB. Mack has been floated by getting the two best QBs we've ever had and doing very little in the other side of the ball. I know that's obvious and you're just a troll but figured I'd point that out for anyone who actually cares.

That “team” may be awful, but Howell has pretty good weapons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

I mean, he leads the NFL in passing yards and has a worse O-Line than Young and an avg at best offense and is coached by Ron.

Leading the NFL in passing yards is cool, but you need to have team success to back it up. Cowboys waxed them he had 300+ yards and only 10 points.

 

If he starts winning then we can legit start discussing him as a franchise QB. Last I heard from people in Washington they still view him as a stop gap QB not a franchise QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

Leading the NFL in passing yards is cool, but you need to have team success to back it up. Cowboys waxed them he had 300+ yards and only 10 points.

 

If he starts winning then we can legit start discussing him as a franchise QB. Last I heard from people in Washington they still view him as a stop gap QB not a franchise QB.

Yeah, it's Howell's fault that they literally have the worst D in the league and no running game. He really should be making more tackles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...