Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CMC Trade, et all


Shocker
 Share

Recommended Posts

Fitty is a corporate cuck

 

he does what Tepper tells him

 he gives the Nicole’s a list of his draft analysis by position and while she’s doing her nails with other yentas she gets to select who’s our #1 pick

 

when the time comes to swallow the sword he’ll gladly do it

 

in essence Fitty is the ideal company man 

  • Beer 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheBigKat said:

Fitty is a corporate cuck

 

he does what Tepper tells him

 he gives the Nicole’s a list of his draft analysis by position and while she’s doing her nails with other yentas she gets to select who’s our #1 pick

 

when the time comes to swallow the sword he’ll gladly do it

 

in essence Fitty is the ideal company man 

None of that can be confirmed but I tend to agree.  So the guy lacks a nut sack so still…goodbye

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah Rhule was the HC and was literally running him into the ground. If he wasn't traded he would have probably been ruined before this year even started.

You can pick so many things that make Fritterer look like the trash GM he is but this one example is another drop in the bucket.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, FugginPoo said:

CMC sucked his last two years here, we literally improved greatly when he left last year.  He’s great in the right system, he’s not an MVP or anything crazy like that

Lol

Rhule and company saved him by not playing him but when he was on the field he was the offense basically.  Stupid comment 

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We got an okay haul for CMC but definitely felt there should have been a first somewhere in there.

I agree though Fitty dropped the ball with CMC, definitely dropped the ball with the Rams/Burns rumored offer and then screwed up trading up for Bryce. Carolina could have probably kept DJ and still traded inside the top 5 and got Richardson.

Edited by TEClemson53
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, TEClemson53 said:

We got an okay haul for CMC but definitely felt there should have been a first somewhere in there.

I agree though Fitty dropped the ball with CMC, definitely dropped the ball with the Rams/Burns rumored offer and then screwed up trading up for Bryce. Carolina could have probably kept DJ and still traded inside the top 5 and got Richardson.

The 2nd round pick went to Bryce, the 3rd and 4th rounder went to fuging DJ Johnson. That's not a haul

  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

How was that a haul?  It was robbery any way you look at it

It certainly was based on what we turned the haul into. The 2nd was a minor part of the trade for #1 for Bryce. The 3rd and 4th we turned into DJ Johnson via trade up. We still have a 5th next year. That better be a Sam Howell level 5th rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Shocker said:

How was that a haul?  It was robbery any way you look at it

Exactly, I was always against trading CMC because his injuries were just bad luck things (like when the guy rolled up on his ankle as he was going into the end zone and gave him the high ankle sprain) and not a bunch of non contact injuries that pile up year after year (like Horn).  Plus, he 100% could have and would have played at the end of both seasons if we were in even the slightest contention, so he missed more games than necessary because there was no point in throwing him back out there to risk injury or hurting draft position in a lost season.

But even if we were to trade him, we get a TERRIBLE package in return.

I understand how the chart works and how all the picks added up to a first round value, but that's basically like saying you're good taking 100 $1 items and hoping you can sell every single one for the dollar and make the same $100 that you could have gotten in return from 1 item.

Trading CMC for anything less than a first, let alone a late 2nd rounder being the best pick in the trade, was beyond atrocious

Edited by tukafan21
  • Pie 2
  • Flames 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, FugginPoo said:

CMC sucked his last two years here, we literally improved greatly when he left last year.  He’s great in the right system, he’s not an MVP or anything crazy like that

You’re only MVP if your team is mediocre before you are on the roster and you win the Super Bowl once you join. If 49ers win Super Bowl, CMC will be MVP.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...