Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Russini: Some coaches wanted to bench Young


UNCrules2187
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, carpanfan96 said:

Dalton ran the scheme just fine. It's the qb that Tepper drafted that's the issue with the playcalling and scheme fit. Not the headcoaches fault. 

Not the hc fault when the owner meets with you each week and demands you add to the playbook and scheme. .

Dalton in one game, has 20% of the passing yards and 22% of the td's that Young has in 10 games. 

Frank's offense is timing based, take your steps and throw the ball. 

 

There is a reason why Bryce led all draft eligible qb's in pressure and sacks responsible for in the last draft. 

And guess what.  He lost.  The veteran pass receiver got two TDs against the worst passing defense in the league at the time and one TD was a broken coverage.  Reguardless of what Frank's offense is, it wasn't working.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, parker said:

And guess what.  He lost.  The veteran pass receiver got two TDs against the worst passing defense in the league at the time and one TD was a broken coverage.  Reguardless of what Frank's offense is, it wasn't working.  

Winning and losing isn’t a QB stat. Our highest scoring game this year was with Dalton when he didn’t even get all the first team reps that week. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, parker said:

Would we be questioning Bryce's play if the team were 11-1?

Yes. Did we not question his play when we won but only scored 15 points? Do they not question Desmond Ridder? So they not question Kenny Pickett? 
 

edit: I’ll add Kirk has been questioned his whole career WHILE WINNING. 

Edited by Varking
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Varking said:

Yes. Did we not question his play when we won but only scored 15 points? Do they not question Desmond Ridder? So they not question Kenny Pickett? 
 

edit: I’ll add Kirk has been questioned his whole career WHILE WINNING. 

You want to jump to another sport while we're at it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, raleigh-panther said:

Young is not it

Nothing else to be said 

 

I wanna give the kid a break but dippers ego is going to jam him down our throat again next year like a porn king.... this year and next year is a lose....get use to it.....then off in another fantasized direction in 25 setting up a decade of losing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...