Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bored, here are some Matt Moore stats


Swarly

Recommended Posts

Bored, so I decided to do some math and figure out what Matt Moores stats MIGHT have been had he started the whole year based off of the 5 games he started.

In 5 games, these are his stats:

79 Att, 126 Completions, 990yds, 62.7 Completion %, 8TD, 1INT, 104.9 rating

Stretched out over a 16 game season, this is what I came up with.

403 ATT, 253 Completions, 3168yds, 62.7%, 23 TDs, 4 ints, 102 rating

Now my math might not be perfect, but the numbers seem about right(the only ones that might be off are the completion %, and passer rating). His stats are kinda skewed on the NFL/ESPN stats page because of that game mid-season where he took over for Delhomme and threw an int, so I only included the 5 games he started.

Again, this is a big what-if situation had he stayed consistent, but just thought I'd do the math to pass some time :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bored, so I decided to do some math and figure out what Matt Moores stats MIGHT have been had he started the whole year based off of the 5 games he started.

In 5 games, these are his stats:

79 Att, 126 Completions, 990yds, 62.7 Completion %, 8TD, 1INT, 104.9 rating

Stretched out over a 16 game season, this is what I came up with.

403 ATT, 253 Completions, 3168yds, 62.7%, 23 TDs, 4 ints, 102 rating

Now my math might not be perfect, but the numbers seem about right(the only ones that might be off are the completion %, and passer rating). His stats are kinda skewed on the NFL/ESPN stats page because of that game mid-season where he took over for Delhomme and threw an int, so I only included the 5 games he started.

Again, this is a big what-if situation had he stayed consistent, but just thought I'd do the math to pass some time :D

Yeah the NFL's not consistent enough to proect stats. But since your not projecting his stats to prove he's better than someone else ur cool.

He had a lot of dropped INTs but got a lot better the more he threw so I think as long as the running game is by his side I think he'll be efficient but not productive. Even if he has a high rating he's almost a lock to get snubbed from the pro-bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah the NFL's not consistent enough to proect stats. But since your not projecting his stats to prove he's better than someone else ur cool.

He had a lot of dropped INTs but got a lot better the more he threw so I think as long as the running game is by his side I think he'll be efficient but not productive. Even if he has a high rating he's almost a lock to get snubbed from the pro-bowl.

what QB doesnt get lucky with dropped INT's?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

what QB doesnt get lucky with dropped INT's?

i don't have the tape anymore but he was missing wide open guys and making some doo doo throws early in the NE game. Vikes was a little slow too. He looked more composed the more the season and his games wore on. Hopefully he just needed some starts to help him calm down. There's no way fox doesn't start him. I'll whip out my pitchfork if he does(I don't have one so I'll have to use a shovel).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't have the tape anymore but he was missing wide open guys and making some doo doo throws early in the NE game. Vikes was a little slow too. He looked more composed the more the season and his games wore on. Hopefully he just needed some starts to help him calm down. There's no way fox doesn't start him. I'll whip out my pitchfork if he does(I don't have one so I'll have to use a shovel).

My parents own a farm I can get all we need. You bring the torches and I'll meet you there. Someone else will have to supply the tar and feathers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
    • It is due diligence at that point. Irresponsible not to take him.  Crossing my fingers on this one, he has everything you look for except experience.  
×
×
  • Create New...