Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Vs Saints 1PM Gameday Thread


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

Correct, 40% to be accurate.  So even Brown's contribution to the playbook is garbage?  I'm asking because I see several narratives backfiring here on the Huddle since Reich's firing.

He actually wrote the whole thing.

It was done with influences from both Reich and McVay but he did all the writing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The problem is David Tepper.

When people are desperate they sometimes make decisions that are high risk with hopes that they pan out. People will behave this way when they feel that they have the right support to allow them to make these high risk decisions.

Again I think the scouting department needs to be thoroughly evaluated and soon.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Loyalty4Life said:

Oh my bad.  I guess I missed Icky still whiffing on speed rushes and WR getting wide open or us running a completely different offense.  

Bryce has not risen to make his team better at all.  He has looked worse and worse the last few games.  No question but you can't show up to a gun fight with a knife.  When that happens and he still plays like this, then I'll call him a bust.

Stop blaming the O-line and the WRs. It's just a stupid narrative not backed up by facts. The O-line is fine, and our receivers get NFL-open plenty of times. Young has atrocious footwork, poor pocket awareness, poo athleticism, poo processing, poo decision-making, poo accuracy, and poo arm strength, all of which have a far more negative impact on our offense than the alleged O-line and receiver problems. In other words, the O-line and receivers might have problems, but Bryce is the problem.

End of story!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Monrowed said:

When people are desperate they sometimes make decisions that are high risk with hopes that they pan out. People will behave this way when they feel that they have the right support to allow them to make these high risk decisions.

Again I think the scouting department needs to be thoroughly evaluated and soon.

I just don't know how much input they actually have. Aside from Bryce we so consistently draft high RAS developmental guys that it really feels like it's all Tepper "analytics".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BenjaminBreeg said:

Stop blaming the O-line and the WRs. It's just a stupid narrative not backed up by facts. The O-line is fine, and our receivers get NFL-open plenty of times. Young has atrocious footwork, poor pocket awareness, poo athleticism, poo processing, poo decision-making, poo accuracy, and poo arm strength, all of which have a far more negative impact on our offense than the alleged O-line and receiver problems. In other words, the O-line and receivers might have problems, but Bryce is the problem.

End of story!

This guy just said the o-line is fine LOOOOOOOL

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MGH1989 said:

This guy just said the o-line is fine LOOOOOOOL

Yes, there are only six teams in the NFL whose O-lines provide their QBs with more time in the pocket than our O-line. You heard that right, only six teams are ahead. It's not our O-line's fault that Bryce holds onto the ball for too long and is too slow to escape sacks.

1614746700_PocketTime.thumb.jpg.34656338cc76eb9a8c89652cc500219f.jpg.85df7e1df20676be39f0cbeebb2ba350.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bryce did not look that bad but that stat line is horrific. Made some NFL backup throws, and as all year long his best plays are runs. That 4th and one where blackshear slipped should have been a qb draw right up the gut.

just a bad team that can’t do anything right on offense. Defense holds up surprisingly well for such a pathetic offense 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, MGH1989 said:

Why in your mind does Field get the benefit of having a team built to help him but Bryce does not?

Lol

he carried the bears last year.  They are putrid. Fields too, has been through 2 HCs

Physically, he is what a nfl qb should be 

young is not 

as Parcells said about young and his physical limitations ‘he better walk on water’. He doesn’t 

if you can’t put a nfl qb under center for 1 yard, you got problems   His size, lack of arm strength etc  alone eliminated parts of the playbook and that, you cannot have in the nfl 

and he can’t hit a sideline route to save his very soul …there is a reason why so many ‘in’ routes are designed for him

he's a nice kid I’m sure and good to his momma and all, but none of that matters at the pro level 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...