Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jamie Dukes is a moron!


methodtoll

Recommended Posts

dukes always fights for the black side.... jus sayn

if its a argument between a black and white player he always chooses the black side, i dont get why all these guys cant stop being biased on there opinions REALLY ANNOYING

as far as skip, i dont agree with alot of his opinions, but you can say he is pretty foward, he doenst hold back, thats why i like listening to him and he is the only reason i watch the show

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We needed another thread made to establish that Jamie dukes is fuging stupid?

Did we really need it?

I'm sorry, I didn't realize that we need another thread out of 20 million threads about Peppers, Moore, and John Fox

I figured that this is something NEW and not the same exact thread over and over again.

I swear, you can't make anyone happy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Complete Doosh.

Worst on the network. And that includes Prime! They got some real good people over there, Rich, Irvin, Mooch, even Rod but yes that dude is awful. I mean he's the worst in the business. He beats Simms by a mile in dooshery categories across the board man!

Who's the white guy they always pair him up with? He's not far behind either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Duke's sucks helmans is way better you are so close to being groaned/pied.

What are you some kind of yankee spy sent to the Huddle to sling mayonnaise propoganda?

Duke's would literally kick the hell out of Helmann's in street fight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's a joke for two reasons:

1) He thinks CJ will rush for 2,000 yards two years straight. Here is the funny part, though. Not anything to do with CJ's talents, but because their QB is Vince Young.

2) Around June, they were debating on who they would select as their franchise player. He said Michael Vick. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The reason many people, I included, dislike Jamie Dukes isn't because of his opinion but the way in which he delivers it. Someone compared him to Skip but even Skip usually will say this is how I feel or think or something like that.

Jamie Dukes states opinions as facts based only on his opinion. It's not I think Michael Vick is the best QB in the NFL, its Michael Vick is the best QB in the NFL. By doing this he makes the audience feel belittled and that in it of itself is bad journelism.

Maybe having Dukes helps ratings but I know for myself I don't watch NFL Access when he is on there, unfortunantly is most of the offseason when NFL Access is the only NFL news out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyone just here Jamie on NFL total access. They were talking about the combine and scouts looking at players. They mentioned Thomas Davis and how his transition from SS to LB and Dukes says "t.d.'s results are mixed at best".

I don't think anyone would agree with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyone just here Jamie on NFL total access. They were talking about the combine and scouts looking at players. They mentioned Thomas Davis and how his transition from SS to LB and Dukes says "t.d.'s results are mixed at best".

I don't think anyone would agree with that.

Heard that comment about Davis too and thought: "HUH?"

I was surprised Bucky Brooks didn't challenge that since he was the head of our college scouting when we drafted Davis. Coming out of college, Davis was a safety/LB prospect... it's not like we found out he couldn't play safety so we moved him to LB. Just about anyone with a clue would agree Davis was having and all-pro season before his injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...