Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jamie Dukes is a moron!

methodtoll

By methodtoll,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

kman72 Newbie

kman72

Posted
Posted

dukes always fights for the black side.... jus sayn

if its a argument between a black and white player he always chooses the black side, i dont get why all these guys cant stop being biased on there opinions REALLY ANNOYING

as far as skip, i dont agree with alot of his opinions, but you can say he is pretty foward, he doenst hold back, thats why i like listening to him and he is the only reason i watch the show

Link to comment
Share on other sites
methodtoll Proficient

methodtoll

Posted
  • Author
Posted

We needed another thread made to establish that Jamie dukes is fuging stupid?

Did we really need it?

I'm sorry, I didn't realize that we need another thread out of 20 million threads about Peppers, Moore, and John Fox

I figured that this is something NEW and not the same exact thread over and over again.

I swear, you can't make anyone happy

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Claws Newbie

Claws

Posted
Posted

Complete Doosh.

Worst on the network. And that includes Prime! They got some real good people over there, Rich, Irvin, Mooch, even Rod but yes that dude is awful. I mean he's the worst in the business. He beats Simms by a mile in dooshery categories across the board man!

Who's the white guy they always pair him up with? He's not far behind either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SCP Enthusiast

SCP

Posted
Posted

Duke's sucks helmans is way better you are so close to being groaned/pied.

What are you some kind of yankee spy sent to the Huddle to sling mayonnaise propoganda?

Duke's would literally kick the hell out of Helmann's in street fight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mage Grand Master

Mage

Posted
Posted

He's a joke for two reasons:

1) He thinks CJ will rush for 2,000 yards two years straight. Here is the funny part, though. Not anything to do with CJ's talents, but because their QB is Vince Young.

2) Around June, they were debating on who they would select as their franchise player. He said Michael Vick. lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mountainpantherfan Newbie

mountainpantherfan

Posted
Posted

The reason many people, I included, dislike Jamie Dukes isn't because of his opinion but the way in which he delivers it. Someone compared him to Skip but even Skip usually will say this is how I feel or think or something like that.

Jamie Dukes states opinions as facts based only on his opinion. It's not I think Michael Vick is the best QB in the NFL, its Michael Vick is the best QB in the NFL. By doing this he makes the audience feel belittled and that in it of itself is bad journelism.

Maybe having Dukes helps ratings but I know for myself I don't watch NFL Access when he is on there, unfortunantly is most of the offseason when NFL Access is the only NFL news out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cold Cat Explorer

Cold Cat

Posted
Posted

anyone just here Jamie on NFL total access. They were talking about the combine and scouts looking at players. They mentioned Thomas Davis and how his transition from SS to LB and Dukes says "t.d.'s results are mixed at best".

I don't think anyone would agree with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CatMan72 Enthusiast

CatMan72

Posted
Posted

anyone just here Jamie on NFL total access. They were talking about the combine and scouts looking at players. They mentioned Thomas Davis and how his transition from SS to LB and Dukes says "t.d.'s results are mixed at best".

I don't think anyone would agree with that.

Heard that comment about Davis too and thought: "HUH?"

I was surprised Bucky Brooks didn't challenge that since he was the head of our college scouting when we drafted Davis. Coming out of college, Davis was a safety/LB prospect... it's not like we found out he couldn't play safety so we moved him to LB. Just about anyone with a clue would agree Davis was having and all-pro season before his injury.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • ForJimmy
      The Bryce Trade is Finally Complete. Who Won the Trade? Panthers vs Bears

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Loyalty4Life
      Well, the Niners just doomed themselves to mediocrity

      By Loyalty4Life · Posted

      Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...