Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What a game by Bryce


DeSim
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Packers have one of the worst defenses in the league and a good QB should be able to put up 300 yards on them.

Bryce was a good QB on this day and did what you'd hoped to see. This is the kind of game you want to have to build on.

And it was wonderful to see the receivers wake up as well.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Khyber53 said:

The Packers have one of the worst defenses in the league and a good QB should be able to put up 300 yards on them.

Bryce was a good QB on this day and did what you'd hoped to see. This is the kind of game you want to have to build on.

And it was wonderful to see the receivers wake up as well.

They are 13th in pass defense 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m rewatching the game right now and loving what I’m seeing. Things I confidently stated that he was not capable of… absolutely could not do… got smoked. Thank you Bryce. I have wanted so badly wanted to be wrong about what you can do. I am. 

What you are, is still yet to be seen. 

Homie’s footwork. Stepping in to throws and rotating his hips and shoulders. Timing. HE THREW DARTS, with CONFIDENCE in to the MIDDLE OF THE FIELD. I saw an NFL arm. Whomever has coached this in to him deserves a king’s ransom. 

He gets the piss knocked out of him and pops up like he’s agent89… but we’ve known that. 

Bryce, thank you for proving me that I don’t know sh+* from shinola, and I’m going to shut my pie hole from now on knocking what you CAN DO. Now go prove me wrong on what you ARE. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Khyber53 said:

The Packers have one of the worst defenses in the league and a good QB should be able to put up 300 yards on them.

Bryce was a good QB on this day and did what you'd hoped to see. This is the kind of game you want to have to build on.

And it was wonderful to see the receivers wake up as well.

Bryce is 3rd most passing yds they've given up. Only 2 other teams went over 300. Mahomes 210 yds

 

.stats are very easy to find

 

 

 

Edited by csx
  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, csx said:

Bryce is 3rd most passing yds they've given up. Only 2 other teams went over 300. Mahomes 210 yds

 

.stats are very easy to find

 

 

 

Really... well, when they're 29th in the league in rushing, it often means that other teams aren't passing on them as much. For an example, check out the Panthers...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...