Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Penix is there at 33


Htarnation4.0
 Share

Recommended Posts

59 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I know a lot of you don’t want to hear it, but if we take another QB high it will be in the 2025 draft at the earliest. Maybe we take a flier on a late round guy or sign a vet for competition, but our goal this offseason is to try to build an offense around Young. If he keeps struggling then 25 is our year to move on IMO. You don’t make that kind of trade like we did without giving that player a ton of opportunities. 

Just prolonging the inevitable 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bear Hands said:

Brugler spoke on him on Prospect to Pros some weeks back.  The interest seems lukewarm on the scouting front but some teams do like him.  Personally, I've been a fan and have followed him, but think he's more in the Bo Nix/Cameron Ward tier than JJ McCarthy.  

The arm strength is just good, not great.  The injury history is there.  Age is up there (although that seems to be about every QB these days being 23+).  His accuracy has greatly improved but he still has to work on timed & layered throws.  He's got some gamer in him though and is a fun dude to root for.  

 

Let's be real, the hype will get him into the top of the first round by the draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Let's be real, the hype will get him into the top of the first round by the draft.

Definitely not, but I could see a Mac Jones type rise where he ended up going mid-1st. I just think the arm strength question mark is pretty obvious and then you have the extensive injury history and age issue. It's a lot of red flags. But the guy is probably the most consistently accurate passer in college football and accuracy tends to translate. I'm definitely curious to see how it plays out for him on the next level. I honestly won't be shocked no matter how it goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

Just prolonging the inevitable 

Maybe. However we have to fix our offense in general. Look no further than Baker Mayfield. Was awful here and got cut midseason to give Darnold a chance. That was with Moore and CMC (part of the time). He goes to Tampa and has a solid season. We need to build this offense and then insert a QB in 25 if needed. Hire the right GM/HC, fix the OL and add some weapons first. Like I said we can add a vet or late round flier to compete with Young in 24. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ForJimmy said:

Maybe. However we have to fix our offense in general. Look no further than Baker Mayfield. Was awful here and got cut midseason to give Darnold a chance. That was with Moore and CMC (part of the time). He goes to Tampa and has a solid season. We need to build this offense and then insert a QB in 25 if needed. Hire the right GM/HC, fix the OL and add some weapons first. Like I said we can add a vet or late round flier to compete with Young in 24. 

I honestly expect us to plan to roll with Bryce again next year but bring in a Brissett or Minshew type solid vet backup to push him. I'm just not at all convinced that Tepper will allow for a legit competition that Bryce could very possibly lose to that type of vet. But I don't think you can just hand Bryce the job again without at least the show of a competition.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Maybe. However we have to fix our offense in general. Look no further than Baker Mayfield. Was awful here and got cut midseason to give Darnold a chance. That was with Moore and CMC (part of the time). He goes to Tampa and has a solid season. We need to build this offense and then insert a QB in 25 if needed. Hire the right GM/HC, fix the OL and add some weapons first. Like I said we can add a vet or late round flier to compete with Young in 24. 

I too have looked at Baker Mayfield and found that as a way to look to the possibility we just need to hit on the right staff.

But Baker has always had the necessary phsyical intangibles and he's always had a pretty good deep ball. He's also 10th in yards per attempt. It's fair to ask if BY had Mike Evans would he even sniff 1k yards here.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I honestly expect us to plan to roll with Bryce again next year but bring in a Brissett or Minshew type solid vet backup to push him. I'm just not at all convinced that Tepper will allow for a legit competition that Bryce could very possibly lose to that type of vet. But I don't think you can just hand Bryce the job again without at least the show of a competition.

We need a good GM to be straight with Tepper. Like “I’m taking the job knowing I have full roster control” kind of guy. If Tepper truly wants to win he needs someone like this. 

I agree and have said a couple times. A vet or late round flier to push him and of course if he shits the bed or gets injured we will still have a plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

We need a good GM to be straight with Tepper. Like “I’m taking the job knowing I have full roster control” kind of guy. If Tepper truly wants to win he needs someone like this. 

I agree and have said a couple times. A vet or late round flier to push him and of course if he shits the bed or gets injured we will still have a plan.

My concern is all the rumors that say that Tepper has gotten rid of anyone willing to tell him the truth. He wants yes men. Until that changes I don't see our fortunes in the field changing. Whatever "analytics" Tepper has cooked up to drive decision making has failed miserably.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

I too have looked at Baker Mayfield and found that as a way to look to the possibility we just need to hit on the right staff.

But Baker has always had the necessary phsyical intangibles and he's always had a pretty good deep ball. He's also 10th in yards per attempt. It's fair to ask if BY had Mike Evans would he even sniff 1k yards here.

Evans would help any QB. AT has over 1000 yards with Young throwing to him. Of course Evans would. Baker having talent and completely struggling here is my point. People keep wanting a quick fix. It’s like Tep thinking a rookie QB can play PG and make all these WRs look better. Mahomes is struggling (for Mahomes) with lesser WR talent and he has Kelce plus Rice has had a good rookie year. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

My concern is all the rumors that say that Tepper has gotten rid of anyone willing to tell him the truth. He wants yes men. Until that changes I don't see our fortunes in the field changing. Whatever "analytics" Tepper has cooked up to drive decision making has failed miserably.

Yeah that will never work. I’m hoping all of his frustration changes things. His team is at rock bottom and hopefully he is looking in the mirror. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep going back to the point that David Tepper the owner would've fired David Tepper the President of Football Operations numerous times in these past six years. He has to swallow that bitter pill and "fire" himself from his current role within the organization. He has to sculpt a new role for himself that has much less involvement on the football side of the house.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...