NFL Coach/GM Updates

[Mr. Scot]

Just now, Martin said:

Hahaha, if you say so. Indirectly calling other people idiots for believing in analytics over and over makes it very clear where you stand.

Sure, dude

[AU-panther]

46 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

You claim I'm misquoting something, only to turn around and completely mischaracterize what I've said

Can you actually quote where I've said analytics shouldn't be used at all?

Hint: I haven't.

What I did say was in response to the suggestion that if we'd engaged in analytics we might not have messed up on Young and others, etc. 

Hence, why I pointed out to our sadly mistaken friend that we did.

Of course we looked at analytics, but we also looked at traditional scouting. Which was the primary driver? 
You keep making absolute statements trying to prove your point and it’s not going well. 
Just because we looked at some analytics driven data doesn’t mean if we had used more that the outcome wouldn’t have been different. 
if anything I would say traditional scouting hurt us more than anything, better use of analytics could have prevented that.  Also better scouting could have. 

[Mr. Scot]

2 minutes ago, AU-panther said:

Of course we looked at analytics, but we also looked at traditional scouting. Which was the primary driver? 
You keep making absolute statements trying to prove your point and it’s not going well. 
Just because we looked at some analytics driven data doesn’t mean if we had used more that the outcome wouldn’t have been different. 
if anything I would say traditional scouting hurt us more than anything, better use of analytics could have prevented that.  Also better scouting could have. 

I'm sure you would say that, but you don't have a single thing to back that up.

Your entire position is basically to disagree with me (which near as I can tell is the only reason you post at all). The problem is you don't seem to have read a single piece of info on the things you claim to know.

Talk to me when you've actually got something to support your claims.

[AU-panther]

46 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm sure you would say that, but you don't have a single thing to back that up.

Your entire position is basically to disagree with me (which near as I can tell is the only reason you post at all). The problem is you don't seem to have read a single piece of info on the things you claim to know.

Talk to me when you've actually got something to support your claims.

diverting again 

[Mr. Scot]

Oy

FYI: Anyone wanting to continue non news related debates, please do so elsewhere and let's go back to using this thread for NFL news regarding other coaching and GM opportunities.

 

[Mother Grabber]

come on you fools. everyone knows game theory mathematics applies only to baseball, and not to, oh, say, everything else ever.

[Mr. Scot]

 

[Evil Hurney]

This could delay the coach hiring cycle for another week. I assume multiple teams will want to bring Johnson in.

Edited January 22 by Evil Hurney

[Jaxel]

Imagine this, whoever we hire brings Joe Brady as his OC. Would Joe even consider it? Lol

[NYPantherFan]

19 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Imagine this, whoever we hire brings Joe Brady as his OC. Would Joe even consider it? Lol

Joe should be getting more HC interviews to be honest. He will be the Johnson/Slowik of next year's cycle

[Mr. Scot]

Speculation the Eagles could replace Brian Johnson too...

[Lame Duck]

Ejiro Evero will be Mike Tomlin like NFL coach.  He’s a great leader and very smart.  He holds players responsible.  He’s my #1 choice for HC.  If he becomes HC, he will rip offense a new asshole.

[Mr. Scot]

 

 

[Jaxel]

Waldron was a hot name last year, surprised it didn't turn into HC opportunities.