Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who do you think will be the Panther's starting QB in 2010?


Lumps

Who do you think will be the Panther's starting QB in 2010?  

53 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you think will be the Panther's starting QB in 2010?

    • Jake Delhomme
    • Matt Moore
    • Neither (Draft or Trade)
      0


Recommended Posts

Who do you think will be the Panther's starting QB in 2010?

Yea its an abused topic but if there was ever poll-worthy question this is it (sadly). Remember I am not asking who you want to start.

No need to flame or go over the same crap if you don't want, or even post.

I just want to see actual numbers on how many people are kidding themselves. :)

Careful... we can see who you vote for ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Delhomme will be back in the starting lineup ready to go. He knows for a fact now he can't lolligag around and play like crap anymore. From day 1 he will be the man and everyone will know he is the man, count on it.

yeah, you can count on Jake to battle his aging body, his mental state, and lack of trust in most of his teammates, to comeback next year and just show us who is the man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

THe guy who starts will be one that earns it. There will be a competition this year and I expect that Moore will have the inside track. Everyone is aware that Jake was never expected to be the long term answer and was merely playing until that person was found. If Moore comes out determined to give it his all, he should be the starter by opening day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jake never lost the job. He was "injured". Matt filled in...which is his job as a backup. We were fed the story by the FO of an injury to Jake's finger, and that's ALL we go by, people. Everyone and their mom knows it wasn't true, but we go by what they tell us. So...since Jake never lost his job, once his finger has "healed", Matt will once again go to backing him up until Jake loses us games and can replace him...which has a high chance of happening.

Simple as that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's pathetic of our team that we as fans cant with 100% confidence say that Jake will not be the starter for 2010.

Until we see how he plays it would be stupid to say anything now. Even if they thought Moore would be the starter they won't tell him yet. They know that competition bring out the best in players plus they have the experience of Moore playing well in 2007 and regressing in 2008. Given their biggest concerns are Moore's lack of preparation and lackadasical attitude, it would be stupid to tell him he is the starter no matter what. That is recipe for complacency. I don't know why fans don't know that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I voted Moore.... actually just once..

Well, I voted with the feeling that this is it for Fox win or lose ( depending on weather or not you believe the rumors going around that Fox doesn't care to be a panther any longer)

That said, Matt Moore has undenialble proof that he gives us the best chance to win. Win % So I THINK Matt Moore will start. If not I think Fox is heh ..... dumb or that there is really something going on with him and dehlomme in the showers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...