Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Senior Bowl Targets


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

21 hours ago, Woody26 said:

His measured height is 6’0 not 6’3. I don’t know how THAT much difference is falsely listed unfortunately 

He is taller than 6'0. Im 6'1 and he is taller than myself. My kid is a big fan of his and he is super cool with kids. Standing up next to him a few times, I dont think he is 6'3 but he is slightly taller than me. Muscled like crazy for his age. Looks like a David Boston without the performance enhancing drugs. Great young man and amazing attitude. Very humble

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Martin said:

I saw Brugler saying he is a bit overrated and belongs more in the third round due to sloppy route running etc.

That makes me feel like an expert because I noticed that watching practice today--we don't need people who can't run routes--that means you are raw or difficult to coach.  He has the tools. 

I was impressed with Georgia's Ladd McConkey today. 

 

Edited by MHS831
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, UNCrules2187 said:

Selfishly would love to grab Tez Walker at the top of the 2nd. Heard he's been tearing it up at the Senior Bowl so far. 

He is a sleeper because he had that weird season--he could become a star, but I see him as a late second/early third guy right now.  His rating may change after this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, WUnderhill said:

Getting a crisp route runner is super important for an anticipation thrower like Young. We need guys that can get to the right spot, on time, consistently. Right now it seems like we have either guys who run good routes but take forever to get there (Thielen), or guys that have enough speed but crappy route running (Chark), or both slow and bad route running (Mingo).

Watch Ricky Pearsall. He's running the best routes at the Senior Bowl practices. I just hope his draft stock doesn't rise too much & he can be had by the 3rd/4th round.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

I’m not buying Legette getting past round 2. He’s a monster and would bring us what DJ Moore did most seasons. His route running looks just fine below. 
 

https://twitter.com/mjhurleytdt/status/1752765044096446770?s=46&t=iUe8E7P_bH33jIZRf7fRSQ

 

 

I’m far from an expert, so I rely heavily on what Dane Brugler says

image.thumb.png.68a0cc286895a6a3cf1c66f16296ea0d.png

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ECHornet said:

I’m not buying Legette getting past round 2. He’s a monster and would bring us what DJ Moore did most seasons. His route running looks just fine below. 
 

https://twitter.com/mjhurleytdt/status/1752765044096446770?s=46&t=iUe8E7P_bH33jIZRf7fRSQ

 

 

I have just seen a few clips of him and looked at his measurables on paper.  I am going to assume Canales likes the big WR after having Evans. So he may be the guy.  As time rolls on, the details will come out.  FWIW, I was born in Columbia while my dad was a Gamecock Tight End, so I have a small network of legacy cocks that communicate a lot.  The theory is that Rattler found Legette a lot and became his #1 target.  He had a great year, and they wonder just how good he would have been with a top QB.  Some say that he would not have been as good unless Rattler was QB, that if a QB who read the defenses well were under center, the ball would have gone to other WRs more often--Gamecock or egg?  not sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

As an avid mock drafter, I can say that I often fall in love with players early in the process and that causes me to overlook other talents.  I am trying to stay objective about Legette, but it is difficult.

It would be worth it for all the “he’s legit” jokes we could use

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, MHS831 said:

I read an article on him--second round grade--but they said that he would go in the first round if Al Davis were still alive--going after the size/speed ratio players (ineffectively).  I am less impressed than before after watching day 1 of the SR bowl practices, but he is having a better day today.

I dont like Leggett at all personally.  Even more so now that he measured 2" shorter than listed, with average to short arms and small hands.  He has all the negatives mingo had in a smaller package.  No seperation on film, might run faster than he is on film but hes not fast on film which is where it matters.  A guy i was really against pre sr bowl was Ladd Mcconkey but he has looked really quick and crisp so far.  Maybe redundant with Thielen but hes much faster and quicker than Thielen is now and I just want guys that can get open.   Watch some of his 1v1s from today.   Wr will usually win 1v1 but still. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

I dont like Leggett at all personally.  Even more so now that he measured 2" shorter than listed, with average to short arms and small hands.  He has all the negatives mingo had in a smaller package.  No seperation on film, might run faster than he is on film but hes not fast on film which is where it matters.  A guy i was really against pre sr bowl was Ladd Mcconkey but he has looked really quick and crisp so far.  Maybe redundant with Thielen but hes much faster and quicker than Thielen is now and I just want guys that can get open.   Watch some of his 1v1s from today.   Wr will usually win 1v1 but still. 

Looks plenty fast on film to me in the first clip of this video:

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's funny how the teams with the great QBs stay at or near the top of the league every season.  Yes it is a team game, but the QB has the biggest impact in most NFL football games. 
    • Look, no one is ever a perfect player.  Since the QB handles the ball on 100% of plays offensively (unless there's a direct snap to a RB or something), I can absolutely see where they get an outsized blame and gain from what happens at any given snap of a football game.   Theoretically, there shouldn't even be a stat or idea to a 4th quarter comeback or game winning drive because you should already have done that during the game.  Losers!  Right?  Just because you win late doesn't take away the fact you tried to lose the game for your team! I'm not a fan of that opinion, but again, I'm just a moron with a keyboard.   Bryce has limited tools.  Bryce has not inspired the same level of confidence in us as Cam Newton did in year 3.  I certainly get that.  We traded a TON of assets to get Bryce, and we still suck.  (I mean, since we've lost games, we're losers right?) I completely understand that some fans are just unhappy with a limited QB and a team that isn't performing well, unless the other teams are worse losers than we are. I will say this:  Bryce will fight until the end.  Sure, he's has some real loser football.   But in close games, he's doing his best to comeback (even against a winner of prevent D). Now is it better or worse if your QB plays their best ball in the first half and sucks 2nd half so long as they finish with 300 yards, 3 TDs for your fantasy points? Who said stats are for winners anyway?  The Panthers and Bryce has a long way to go.  I'm enjoying the winning right now.  Though I do start each game thinking "how will we fug this up today?" Because it's been such a poo show in the Tepper era.  Will he prove to be a legit starting NFL QB?  Maybe not here as evidence by our record with QBs who were high draft picks.  
    • Ive never liked the term game winning drives because they include games where the QB was part of or was the reason the team was behind in the first place. Ive been arguing against this stat since the Delhomme years. It should only count when the QB is out of the equation of reasons why the team fell behind in the first place and is at least half the reason why he led the last drive to give them a lead. It shouldnt count if they just hand it off most of the time and the RB is on fire and they go down and score a TD or FG.
×
×
  • Create New...