Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Michael Vick be Headed Back to the NFC South?


rey2009

Recommended Posts

4 real tho'! i dont know why we didnt get him when he got out :confused:instead they give jake del(bum)homme all that $ and playin time 4 what? i tell you after the playoff game when IMO he sold out to the sea(bums)hawks after a great season he's never been the same..as far as i'm concerned he's on BUM STATIS LOL LOL i hope he stays on the bench and stay w/MOORE!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4th round pick? uhh... hell yes the motherf**ka would make the team MORE completive nuff said.

how do you figure? Our offense is based off the playaction....which actually is hard scheme on QBs. Vick isn't really a QB....he is just a great athlete that plays QB. Vick doesn't fit our scheme...and he was also pretty worthless running the "wildcat" in Philly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as Richardson is owner, Vick will never be a Panther.

i call bs, we dont have many picks and he WANTS to be here, so he'll be ok with a lower contract if he gets a legit chance at the starting job. If the price is right (money makes the world go round) Mr. Richardson will swallow his "pride."

and im sure Vick is confident he can out shine Moore and def. Delhomme in TC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and im sure Vick is confident he can out shine Moore and def. Delhomme in TC.

But he won't outshine them. Without his speed, he wouldn't be a QB at all. Speed is where he got, not his arm. So hopefully Vick will never come here. I just wish he was in jail until he is 40 & never have a chance to come here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...