Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sports Agency telling players not to take cognitive tests before draft.


TLGPanthersFan
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, Shotgun said:

One thing is for sure, I would never use a high pick on a QB that didn't throw at the combine.    

I remember back when Cam was in the draft he was told not to participate in combine but he wanted to compete that bad so he did. Also kuechly was considered one of the smartest players but his athleticism was getting questioned but after he tested so well at the combine it was a easy pick to draft in top 10. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I'm a football player not a test taker".

Very apt words to look back on.

Competive teams draft football players not accommodating dinner guests that the wife of the owner is smitten with.

In the end all the in between stuff is irrelevant. It doesn't matter what the draft boards said. The Texans felt just fine about CJ Stroud based on his tape and his combine. Whereas apparently the Panthers front office and even some prominent former Panthers thought he had inferior football IQ and subpar leadership. This should be a very hard lesson learned to not just the Panthers as a franchise but to the fans not to get caught up in all the blovating from talking heads.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Mage said:

Why do people continue to act as if the test hurt Stroud's stock?  He went 2nd overall.  Bryce was generally considered the frontrunner long before the test came out (although yes some people had Stroud over him, but nobody changed their mind about that because of some test).  And there is nothing at all to suggest the test played any role in who the Panthers preferred first.  

There were literally people on this board who were all about Stroud until that test and then hopped firmly on the Bryce bandwagon. Now if you’re saying no decision makers’ minds were changed? Sure that’s possible

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Martin said:

Completely disagree (which is ok) that Tepper sold Young to the org. Fitt loved him for years and it has been reported over and over that the whole org was sold on him. But I agree that Tepper was probably ecstatic that his preferred face of the franchise was the same player pushed by the GM and coach.

It’s still just a completely unproven theory that Tepper even preferred Young at all. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JawnyBlaze said:

There were literally people on this board who were all about Stroud until that test and then hopped firmly on the Bryce bandwagon. Now if you’re saying no decision makers’ minds were changed? Sure that’s possible

the threads are out there but as a rule we cannot bump but you are 100% right and couple that with Teppers words about distribution, not need wrs, his love of analytics etc it doesnt take a rocket scientist to know how things went down.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I remember back when Cam was in the draft he was told not to participate in combine but he wanted to compete that bad so he did. Also kuechly was considered one of the smartest players but his athleticism was getting questioned but after he tested so well at the combine it was a easy pick to draft in top 10. 

Yeah, if you have Cam or Luke traits you're crazy not to go show them off.

A lot is made of Luke's intelligence but I think a lot of folks forget that he was an ELITE athlete. If you send coaches into a room to build a prototype NFL MLB, out walks Luke Kuechly.

Screenshot_20240217-131601.thumb.png.de51f39d5e9c26d9b2fbe603de2e4740.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Plenty of guys who have run subpar 40s have had great careers. The pre-draft process isn't about proving anything, it's about maximizing your draft stock. It's not about fear, it's all about showing your strengths and minimizing your weaknesses.

Agreed. Agents want their clients to get as much money as possible, which means get drafted as high as possible. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JawnyBlaze said:

There were literally people on this board who were all about Stroud until that test and then hopped firmly on the Bryce bandwagon. Now if you’re saying no decision makers’ minds were changed? Sure that’s possible

This is an online internet forum.  You know how many wild opinions are posted on this site?  

Fans on a message board (who represent a very small minority) /=/ NFL front offices.

How about this.  Name me one legit draft analyst who switched up on Bryce/Stroud because of the cognitive test.  Just one is all I ask for.  Someone who had Stroud above Bryce, then switched solely because of the cognitive test.  

Edited by Mage
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mage said:

This is an online internet forum.  You know how many wild opinions are posted on this site?  

Fans on a message board (who represent a very small minority) /=/ NFL front offices.

How about this.  Name me one legit draft analyst who switched up on Bryce/Stroud because of the cognitive test.  Just one is all I ask for.  Someone who had Stroud above Bryce, then switched solely because of the cognitive test.  

I mean, you said no one. So the possibility that you didn’t actually mean no one is why threw the last part in. I have no way of knowing people’s reasoning (not to mention there’s no such thing as a legit draft analyst imo. They’re pretty much all hacks.). And even if someone switched their reason solely because of the S2 they wouldn’t admit it. 

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He's handing off play calling duties to fuging Brad Idzik as well so, either that mouth breather can run the playbook and Canales can grow as an all around head coach or it will be a horrible decision and both of them and BY can screw off. I'm fine with that as long as it isn't just another excuse for BY to get another year with another coach worthy of working around his limitations as a qb. 
    • Not only for Andersen but the whole team, having not beat the Habs this season before tonite.  Shows them that they aren't jinxed.
    • I understand why people say things like it could be worse in relation to Tepper but it just doesn't jive for me. Are the optics bad? Yes. Would I want her to be the owner of my team? No. But I mean she's only been owner for a year and the Colts overall are a better run organization. As far as I know they've also never had the distinction of having the worst win percentage in all of professional sports either. Tepper has owned this team for 8 years and about the only thing that has been consistent has been the ability to continue to find different ways to achieve new lows. Even now people are saying things are different yada yada but we said these same things at certain points under Rhule Fitterer and Reich. I'm going to wait to see how the rubber meets the road this upcoming season before I make any strong conclusions about anything in relation to the longevity under this franchise going forward.
×
×
  • Create New...