Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers cut Bradley Bozeman


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

Itty, bitty cap savings, little purchasing power in FA due to Burns and only six draft picks, yet we are creating more holes.   I get the roster needs a make over, but if we keep cutting able bodied guys at even fringe starter quality and absorbing 99% of their cap hit just to be anywhere but here, then we are tanking.  There's no question about it.  What a fugged up year to tank.

Lol at the PSL holders who got their ticket prices jacked up to watch the 2024 tank show.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Itty, bitty cap savings, little purchasing power in FA due to Burns and only six draft picks, yet we are creating more holes.   I get the roster needs a make over, but if we keep cutting able bodied guys at even fringe starter quality and absorbing 99% of their cap hit just to be anywhere but here, then we are tanking.  There's no question about it.  What a fugged up year to tank.

Lol at the PSL holders who got their ticket prices jacked up to watch the 2024 tank show.

I get the scheme fit but you create a hole that has to be filled, you don't save cap space and possibly you end up creating a "reach" need in the draft.

It just seems like a very Panthers way to handle it.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

#Teppmagic

One thing this does prove is while Fitterer and Morgan worked side by side and are still friends to this day, they don't necessarily approach building a NFL roster the same way.  Morgan is already cleaning up some of Fitterer's past moves even though we have limited resources to plug new players into those holes. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 45catfan said:

One thing this does prove is while Fitterer and Morgan worked side by side and are still friends to this day, they don't necessarily approach building a NFL roster the same way.  Morgan is already cleaning up some of Fitterer's past moves even though we have limited resources to plug new players into those holes. 

One hopes it is a shared vision with the new coach. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

that doesnt make sense, the cut I mean

It makes me think Morgan basically said, 'cut your contract or be cut.'  Making some dudes an example.  If the Ian Thomas "restructure" ends up being essentially a salary cut, then Morgan's message has been sent to the rest of the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

It makes me think Morgan basically said, 'cut your contract or be cut.'  Making some dudes an example.  If the Ian Thomas "restructure" ends up being essentially a salary cut, then Morgan's message has been sent to the rest of the team.

Or the new coach evaluating and basically saying, "Hey, I can't use this guy."

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

It makes me think Morgan basically said, 'cut your contract or be cut.'  Making some dudes an example.  If the Ian Thomas "restructure" ends up being essentially a salary cut, then Morgan's message has been sent to the rest of the team.

that doesnt make sense as he still gets paid, would be a weird way to try and alpha someone but I guess we will see once the details of thomas comes out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Wide zone sucks. Reich and Canales both looked at the only success we had running the ball with Wilks and both were like nah lets do the opposite whimpy ass wide zone scheme

Our implementation of it and players used for it sucks.  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Trade up for a project was dumb, he's gonna be 25 next month. By the time you're deciding on whether he's worth the 5th year option or a big contract you're already gonna be thinking about moving on soon either way.  
    • I mean this is legit AF statement....you don't spend that draft capital on a project just like you don't trade up for an injured RB either, which was done in the same draft.  That draft IMO was a necessary evil for DM to learn from his mistakes (I think he did but some may not). Also I have to mention I'm a big Coker fan and think getting him as an UDFA was obv a steal.  Coker is the better WR2 at this point as Legette and its not even debatable unfortunately.  Give him year 3 but don't expect much from him.  Continue in the offseason with adding as much talent and competition on the roster as possible including WR.  Or just trade his ass for peanuts and continue to build roster by any means.......  
    • Losing him was a huge loss. Look at how the Bears went from a 5 win team to now a 11 win team. The Lions offensive line is bad this year, secondary is bad and Campbell going for it on 4th down all the time has cost them games instead of taking the Field Goals. Goff is inconsistent as well.
×
×
  • Create New...