Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Newton dropping nuggets: most execs say the jury is still out on Bryce


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

We were a dumpster fire, even more than we probably realized, just a fire as hot as Hell. And according to some NFL people, there's no way Bryce could've succeeded in that environment.

David Newton took notes at the Combine this year. Let's get to the meat of it:

 

Does that mean the Panthers made a huge mistake in trading two first-round picks (2023, 2024) and top wide receiver DJ Moore for the right to draft Young? Not according to NFL executives, coaches and scouts at last week's combine.

"It's too early,'' said Tampa Bay Buccaneers general manager Jason Licht. "You can't take anything away from Stroud. He had a great year. Unbelievable.

"But it's still too early to tell. It wouldn't surprise me, as good as Bryce was in college, if he rebounds and has a helluva year this year.''

MOST WHO WERE interviewed believe if Stroud had ended up in Carolina, he would have struggled, and if Young had gone to Houston, he would have succeeded because the Texans were set up better for success.

"Houston had an absolutely phenomenal offense that would have fit Bryce perfectly,'' said one NFL executive, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. "It fit CJ perfectly. There wasn't as much to manage at the line of scrimmage. There were a lot of guys running wide open, and not because they are great separators.

"It's a lot of scheme.''

Most agreed that Carolina's spread offense -- orchestrated by coach Frank Reich, who was fired after a 1-10 start -- lacked the personnel, from offensive line to tight end to wide receiver, to be successful.

 

Multiple sources with direct knowledge of the situation also said there was dysfunction in Carolina because of a difference in philosophy between Reich, offensive coordinator Thomas Brown and offensive line coach James Campen. Several with knowledge of the situation noted the pistol formation used prominently in the season opener wasn't implemented until the week before, an example of not having Young properly prepared.

"That's how little of a plan there was,'' said one source with knowledge of the situation.

"Bryce really didn't stand a chance,'' said another source with direct knowledge of what was going on.

"They put way too much on him,'' another source said.

 

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/39675345/did-panthers-make-mistake-trading-take-bryce-young-cj-stroud

There's more (so hopefully what I've posted is fair use), but I'd say that this is plenty for discussion and that which is most pertinent to why Young is being given the benefit of doubt by those whose jobs are to make those types of decisions.

  • Pie 8
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh, will he retire already?   Newton put sources to what we all already knew.  The staff had too many voices, put too much on Bryce's plate and we lacked the personnel to run the offense we were attempting to run...all meaning Young will probably look better this year. 

Earth shattering!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Several with knowledge of the situation noted the pistol formation used prominently in the season opener wasn't implemented until the week before, an example of not having Young properly prepared.

This is absolutely insane.  How the hell did anyone think a rookie QB is going to get this in a week? I've always thought that had we drafted Stroud he would have similar outcome as Young.  Maybe win a game or so more because he's a bit harder to bring down than our featherweight QB. 

The difference in philosophy between Reich, Brown and Campen obviously played a big part.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why I wait and see.

That's why I hope and believe that it will all be better.

It was a fugged up situation BY stepped into. He didn't stand a chance. No one would have. We were making it up as we went along and none of the guys defining the offense were on the same page with each other.

One voice next year rather than a bunch of voices. One direction. One philosophy. One offense that will actually be based on what we have rather than spontaneously pulling an offense out of a dozen asses and hoping that the people we have can do the poo that we threw on the wall.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

It's certainly more interesting to consider that NFL execs are more thoughtful about what Bryce Young may still have to offer than a bunch of numbskulls on a message board. 

I think Newton writes for the housewives of fans so they can catch up on the Panthers or fans of other teams.  Most of the stuff he writes about is old news to most of our fan base.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

All the experts had bryce over stroud pre draft plus no one was talking about how great texans offense was at that time. They all rated stroud lower because he was the one who could only succeed with top talent around supposedly. These experts opinions are becoming less and less relevant. If you have been watching the game a long time you can do your own evaluation and rankings at this point because its nothing but horse poo everywhere else. 

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I would be willing to bet those on this board have watched 90% more of young then those execs

Perhaps within the context of a dumpster fire, but highly unlikely considering that Bryce has played football since he was wee high...well, he's still wee high, but you get what I'm saying.😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 45catfan said:

I think Newton writes for the housewives of fans so they can catch up on the Panthers or fans of other teams.  Most of the stuff he writes about is old news to most of our fan base.

If you're suggesting that what NFL execs were saying regarding Bryce during this past 10 days is not interesting, then say it's not interesting to you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Hoenheim said:

I'd straight up draft his replacement if Bryce leads us to another last place finish. 

Well, I've already said that we need to draft some Bryce insurance this draft, but a whole lotta people seem to disagree. I'm with you though. Being reactive as opposed to proactive would be absolutely understandable (even from a suspect draft class).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, top dawg said:

Perhaps within the context of a dumpster fire, but highly unlikely considering that Bryce has played football since he was wee high...well, he's still wee high, but you get what I'm saying.😁

I would bet the majority of this board has seen more NFL bryce then just about every other nfl exec.  What he has done prior to last season doesnt matter at all.  I would venture to say that I, like many other fans on here probably saw every snap young played.  If not all at least 98% of them.  And I dont have to be a nfl exec to see that his footwork was bad, his deep ball is bad, his hop throw motion is bad and his arm strength is bad.  And quite frankly it really doesnt matter what another team exec says, why would they give 2 shits about bryce?  Why would they say anything negative at all?  Does that ever happen?

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...