Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you trade back from pick #101 to add a fifth rounder?


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

All depends on how far or what you got in return.

trade down 5 spots for an additional 5th-6th rd pic.

trading down 10+ spots for Pennie’s.  No.

if there is a single guy your deadset on at 101.  I’m not picking up the phone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

If it were me, I would take Tampa at 101. 

Tampa has some serious deficiencies that seem to be mostly footwork related, and he doesn't have the best vertical speed (maybe not enough to handle legit receivers)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DJ feed me moore said:

No way, 2 starting caliber corners are on the board, take one!

As stated, Tampa has some serious deficiencies. I don't know whoever else you're referring to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At a certain point these late rounders just become like UDFAs. I personally don’t see much value in them. Looking at our draft history we haven’t had a good 5th-7th rounder in 10 years. We actually had a pretty good run of them with Hurney. Hardy, Norman, AJ Klein, Munnerlyn. But yeah the past 10 years we may as well have not even had the picks so I’d just as soon not trade back to add a worthless 5th rounder, and is also the reason I felt the trade up from 33 to 32 for the 5th yr option was so worth it because ultimately swapping a 5th for a 6th rounder seems absolutely meaningless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DJ feed me moore said:

Khyree jackson from Oregon.

Dude, the first thing I see from The 33rd Team is:

"Jackson is a tall and long cornerback who has the ball skills to play outside at the next level, but his lack of strength, foot quickness, and effort in run support makes him scheme-specific and not as versatile." 

Here is the full draft profile if interested:

https://www.the33rdteam.com/khyree-jackson-2024-nfl-draft-combine-results-scouting-report-for-oregon-cb/

 

He has some deficiencies as well. I wouldn't say he's a definitive starter based upon what I'm reading.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they can sign Gilmore, and I don’t want to trade up. 

And I’ve done no real vetting of these lower round players, but I think I’d take a shot at trading back a little and seeing if he makes it to us. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. It was an obvious red flag that a lot of people ignored. The results/scores in preseason don’t matter, but individual performance very much does and individually, we looked like the least talented team in the league and it carried over.
    • Sorry, but in 2015, we didn’t look like poo to the extent of 2023. People who said it’s just preseason were completely wrong. Simple as that. 2015 was a veteran lead team. It was Cam’s 5th year and Luke’s 4th. Even our OL was 80% the same (added Oher) as the great run to finish 2014 with a playoff win. That year can be labeled as preseason doesn’t matter because I’m sure we rested vets and well, Ron/Mike weren’t putting in special plays, etc. I absolutely don’t recall a bunch of us saying that Turner was getting killed on one on ones or that Luke was completely out of position or that Norman was hurt again but probably fine. The only thing that was right about the 2023 preseason is that the minority of us who saw it, were correct that we A) should have been making Young and others play 100% of the reps as there was nothing to hide and B) the preseason means nothing was a bunch of BS trying to stay optimistic when it was obvious that we had way less good talent than the rest of the NFL.
    • You are telling me Paul Maurice is a better coach than Rod??? Yes!!!  It’s because he plays a better system and has a better goalie.   Our system sucks in playoffs and he refuses to roll with Koochie. Dallas cowboys level poo 
×
×
  • Create New...