Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper's revolving door continues


 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I mean, there's a definite trend here. It is what it is. A revolving door of personnel and losses piling up. That's been the story of the Tepper era so far.

I am not making this judgement personally but maybe we are purging under performers or people with opposing philosophies and he is at the bottom of the ‘to do’ list. 

We don’t know why at this time. Maybe it will come out. He isn’t a key player in much, being VP of... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Until he is a total liability, he should play out his contract since it is basically guaranteed.

In the case of him repeating 2023, we do not give him starting status for 2025, and we move to upgrade the position. 

But he will know the system. It is simple: insist he honor the contract until it benefits you for him to not be bound by it. I think if he stinks it up again, you salvage whatever value you can any way you can and that is likely the only way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, strato said:

I am not making this judgement personally but maybe we are purging under performers or people with opposing philosophies and he is at the bottom of the ‘to do’ list. 

We don’t know why at this time. Maybe it will come out. He isn’t a key player in much, being VP of... 

I mean it's an ownership problem in any business when there is this much turnover. Anyone that's had a shitty boss ruin a job that could have been a pleasant and profitable situation can relate regardless of the level of employment or specific duties of the job. There is very little you can do as far as building a culture when you have an instrusive dickhead owner 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, countryboi said:

this is interesting, it feels like if they were going to fire him they would have done it already but he was on blueprint looking excited about the draft. If i had to guess he did something non football related that got him fired. 

According to Joe Person Adrian a Wilson sexually assaulted Sir Purr 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah this really isn’t a big deal, he was brought in by Fitterer which was the worst GM in our history. Staff changes are expected after going 2-15.

Besides, all that hype was just hype. It’s not like the Cards just came off the SB and he was some type of guru.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I mean it's an ownership problem in any business when there is this much turnover. Anyone that's had a shitty boss ruin a job that could have been a pleasant and profitable situation can relate regardless of the level of employment or specific duties of the job. There is very little you can do as far as building a culture when you have an instrusive dickhead owner 

Chances are Morgan fired him.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Chances are Morgan fired him.

Technically Morgan probably had to deal with it, until we see a few years of stability it's totally fair to speculate that Tepper is just toying with this whole operation with no direction from the top down. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I mean it's an ownership problem in any business when there is this much turnover. Anyone that's had a shitty boss ruin a job that could have been a pleasant and profitable situation can relate regardless of the level of employment or specific duties of the job. There is very little you can do as far as building a culture when you have an instrusive dickhead owner 

My job wasn’t sports but it was very much a team oriented proposition. I wouldn’t know how to argue against the track record critics. I’m with them 

I think maybe the question is: is Tepper capable/incapable of learning, of overcoming his compulsion to impart his vision via firing people. Question mark.

Certainly he understands that that is not ideal. To have your prize draft pick worked and trained in a nice continuous arc is the ideal, bi-annual disruption is not at all the ideal. Even when it is disrupted with the best of intentions. 

He has to figure this out sooner or later, right? 

Edited by strato
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Probably just a parting of ways like most regime change. (Voluntary or not)

Kevin Winston looks to be the new Player guy and he’s been doing this for years with the Falcons and Bucs prior to coming to Charlotte.

Having to get to page two and get passed anti-Bryce/Morgan/Tepper posts just to get meaningful info is dumb as poo. Thank you so much for doing the legwork and finding out who the replacement is.

For those that are also interested in looking further into Winston's background instead of crying, here:


image.png.f75c9b74ca756e97bb21ae0853e0b786.png

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh no, cancel the season then. Without him we will never reach the super bowl this year.....In all  honesty who cares, bye. Replace him with someone better and move on. Keep flushing that toilet with players and coaches and all staff until you eventually get all the turd down and are left with good people.

Edited by Ricky Prickles
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...