Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fox - Go Screw Yourself!!


tukafan21
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I see Brady taking the Peyton Manning route. Calling games ain't for everybody.

 

He can just start his own show or something like the Manning's have. I guess we will see how it goes his first season.

 

Greg got screwed, but it's Brady he will always have the top spot just because he's the GOAT.

Brady doesn't have the personality to have his own show like the Manning brothers do, that's something entirely different than being a color commentator.

Aint nobody paying Brady $40 million to do something like the Manningcast

He'd be more likely to end up as a studio analyst than that, and maybe he will someday, but unless Fox fires him, I can't see him walking away from that contract unless he's truly miserable calling games.

He's going to get $37 million a year, while not being allowed to do like 75% of the work that most color commentators do because of these new proposed restrictions for him.  He needs to show up 22 Sunday's a season and talk for 3 hours, what an easy gig

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Brady doesn't have the personality to have his own show like the Manning brothers do, that's something entirely different than being a color commentator.

Aint nobody paying Brady $40 million to do something like the Manningcast

He'd be more likely to end up as a studio analyst than that, and maybe he will someday, but unless Fox fires him, I can't see him walking away from that contract unless he's truly miserable calling games.

He's going to get $37 million a year, while not being allowed to do like 75% of the work that most color commentators do because of these new proposed restrictions for him.  He needs to show up 22 Sunday's a season and talk for 3 hours, what an easy gig

Are you jealous of Brady bro?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, TNPanther said:

Brady will draw in the views on his name alone. I think he will be terribly boring. 

Fox's broadcasting quality has really overall declined lately. 

Ehhhh, not so sure about that

Why would someone watch a football game they don't care about just to hear Brady be a commentator during the game?

I'm a massive sports fan and I don't think I've ever once watched a game because of an announcer, would be a weird reason to tune in

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Ehhhh, not so sure about that

Why would someone watch a football game they don't care about just to hear Brady be a commentator during the game?

I'm a massive sports fan and I don't think I've ever once watched a game because of an announcer, would be a weird reason to tune in

Maybe if they get Taylor swift in the booth lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Ehhhh, not so sure about that

Why would someone watch a football game they don't care about just to hear Brady be a commentator during the game?

I'm a massive sports fan and I don't think I've ever once watched a game because of an announcer, would be a weird reason to tune in

I'm in the minority here but I actually really enjoy listening to Tony Romo. I've tuned into games on CBS in which I don't have a dog in the fight because of him. On the contrary, I've avoided watching MNF in the past specifically because of Joe Tessitore. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/28/2024 at 10:17 PM, PNW_PantherMan said:

Fox doesn't really care about the product on Sundays.  They haven't done anything in almost 25 years to make the broadcast better.  People watch regardless.  I'm sick of the football robot.

 C’mon, man! Cleatus is all right. And just curious, what would you suggest they improve?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Move the Panthers to Raleigh said:

 C’mon, man! Cleatus is all right. And just curious, what would you suggest they improve?

This isnt unique to Fox but I think they are worse than the others

They spend too much time on poo thats not on the field. Fantasy football, gambling BS, and trying to be a comedy show.

If they would focus on the sport, the games, and the players they would vastly improve their game-day programming.

Edited by Cullenator
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...