Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

Hunters value is at CB in the league I don't even know who he's talking about but I'd bet 100% Hunter is a CB in the NFL.

I mean I don't really care what position he plays I just want us to have the chance to draft him.

 

He's a playmaker on either side of the ball. The scary part is we really aren't seeing his true potential because he's playing both sides. Imagine if he focused on playing a single position. He would really stand out because his body would be much fresher.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

I mean I don't really care what position he plays I just want us to have the chance to draft him.

 

He's a playmaker on either side of the ball. The scary part is we really aren't seeing his true potential because he's playing both sides. Imagine if he focused on playing a single position. He would really stand out because his body would be much fresher.

 

 

If we have a chance to draft him that means drafting him won't mean dick for us. Bryce has proven he's not the answer and we probably have a top five pick. Add an elite CB or WR either one and we still suck.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

If we have a chance to draft him that means drafting him won't mean dick for us. Bryce has proven he's not the answer and we probably have a top five pick. Add an elite CB or WR either one and we still suck.

Here is where I am with Bryce.

 

1. If he improves and show signs of massive improvement then we continue with him as our QB for the foreseeable future.

 

2. If he doesn't improve we move on and trade for a stop gap QB because I'm not high on any of the QB's besides Sanders and we all know Prime is not letting his son play for the Panthers. That's why I say a trade for Sam Howell would make sense as a stop gap. He's better than Bryce at worst case scenario.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CamWhoaaCam said:

Here is where I am with Bryce.

 

1. If he improves and show signs of massive improvement then we continue with him as our QB for the foreseeable future.

 

2. If he doesn't improve we move on and trade for a stop gap QB because I'm not high on any of the QB's besides Sanders and we all know Prime is not letting his son play for the Panthers. That's why I say a trade for Sam Howell would make sense as a stop gap. He's better than Bryce at worst case scenario.

 

 

No, I meant that if we're in a position to draft Hunter then Bryce will have clearly proven he ain't it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No, I meant that if we're in a position to draft Hunter then Bryce will have clearly proven he ain't it.

Not necessarily. He can show signs of improvement and we still lose games. Like last year our defense was our strength. The offense could be our strength this year but the defense takes a step back.

 

I'm just looking at Bryce. Is he showing he can throw down the field. Is he showing better pocket awareness. Is the offense scoring more points. I'm watching those things.

 

What's clear is this team lacks talent, I can't lie and say I expect more than 6 wins at max. I think the Patriots/Giants will be the teams to watch. I still have us as a bottom 3 team. Bryce can improve as a QB and we still lose games, but those games could be much closer than last years L's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interested to see WR, C.J. Daniels for LSU tonight. He’s LSU X receiver and defacto number one receiver after transferring in from Liberty where he had 55 receptions for 1,067 yards, and 10 TD’s as a Junior.

Nussmeier doesn’t have the typical weapons that LSU QB’s have been accustomed to so it’ll interesting to see how LSU’s offense looks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

Want to talk about a cupcake? Look at Notre Dame's schedule for the rest of the season. It's a freaking cakewalk designed to keep them high in the rankings so the networks and talking heads can gush over them.

When ND has made it to the playoffs they have gotten absolutely wrecked. They just aren't what they used to be and I honestly don't think they have the ability to get there. They'd be exposed if they were actually in a conference.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

He's not getting drafted before Hunter. We can put $100 bet on that right now.

Done deal

as a WR though… if teams decide he’s a CB, then it’s about need

But if he goes into the draft as a WR, there is zero chance he’s taken ahead of T-Mac (or Burden for that matter) assuming he plays out the season healthy and doesn’t have an injury red flag pulling his draft stock down

NFL teams don’t fall for media darlings and feel good stories in the top of the draft. 

Cant wait till we play them this year, T-Mac had 9 for 107 and a TD last year with Hunter covering him all game.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For those that like the WR position, keep an eye on Zachariah Branch from USC, he’s already drawing comparisons to Tyreek Hill as just a sophomore. If he continues trending upward he’ll be a top five pick in 2025.

USC has a lot more weapons than LSU and I actually prefer Miller Moss to Garrett Nussmeier. If Lynn has improved USC on the defensive side of the ball then USC could pull the upset.

Edited by MillionDollarCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Done deal

as a WR though… if teams decide he’s a CB, then it’s about need

But if he goes into the draft as a WR, there is zero chance he’s taken ahead of T-Mac (or Burden for that matter) assuming he plays out the season healthy and doesn’t have an injury red flag pulling his draft stock down

NFL teams don’t fall for media darlings and feel good stories in the top of the draft. 

Cant wait till we play them this year, T-Mac had 9 for 107 and a TD last year with Hunter covering him all game.

I feel you are overreacting because he had a 300 yard game.

 

Are you a Arizona fan or something?

 

I thought the Missouri WR was the favorite to be the 1st WR selected.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...