Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Miami looks like the class of the ACC this year, (although that could quickly change).  But they loaded up in the portal, especially getting Cam Ward (the qb FSU wanted).  

I think Clemson is right there.  I think people made too much of a bad half against #1 GA opening week.  

 ACC title game going to be Miami/Clemson IMO.  Clemson still got an edge on that conference defensively 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I think Miami looks significantly better than Clemson, albeit it's very early.

Clemson was basically a video game on easy mode vs App St and went toe to toe with UGA in Atl for a half

Miami beat what could be a fairly bad Florida team.  

Not sure the games exist for them to of looked significantly better.  I’d say there probably hasn’t been enough football played yet to really gauge them.  

I still think Clemson has the best D talent in the ACC and jokes aside, still the best coached team.   I’ll believe Miami or FSU are actually back where they successfully prove it one season at this stage. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Clemson was basically a video game on easy mode vs App St and went toe to toe with UGA in Atl for a half

Miami beat what could be a fairly bad Florida team.  

Not sure the games exist for them to of looked significantly better.  I’d say there probably hasn’t been enough football played yet to really gauge them.  

I still think Clemson has the best D talent in the ACC and jokes aside, still the best coached team.   I’ll believe Miami or FSU are actually back where they successfully prove it one season at this stage. 

ECU is dominating App too. In the second half, UGA was basically a video game in easy mode too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Really? You don't see why a team can't draft a QB in the 1st round while then starting their former #1 overall pick over them while on the last year of their deal? It puts the team in a TERRIBLE place no matter how the season goes.  If Bryce sucks, you have to answer questions as to why he was still on the team to begin with, let alone starting over the rookie.  If he's good, then you run into the situation the Vikings were in last offseason with sticking with the rookie contract or the the guy who just performed instead of said young QB. It's one thing when teams keep a vet around as a bridge QB, it's something entirely different when that QB is still only in their mid 20's and was taken #1 overall by that team.   That just doesn't happen and not sure it ever has in NFL history before.
    • What is the alternative? - BY, will not play for less then his perceived contract (just like Cam Newton did). So you pay him top of market as befitting a 1st round, Heisman winning, playing birthing QB would get. Or you cut him. - Then we are forced to either sign a stop gap QB / previously failed QB and try to fix him or you spend a 1st round pick and draft a guy, basically resetting the team.  The reality is that we all want a top 5 QB. The problem is there are only 5 of those guys in the world and drafting, even #1 overall doesn't guarantee that.  The other problem is the NFL market. Young QB get paid. Even an average, young QB gets top of market deals. I know a lot of people here think we could sign him to an 'average QB contract' but thats not reality. Didnt happen with Cam wont happen with BY.  So we could let this season flush out and he is again a middling QB. But then we cut and restart or accept it is what it is (including compensation) and build a team around what we have.  My money is on the latter. 
×
×
  • Create New...