Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I'm telling yall ewers is a nfl qb. Not sure what his ceiling is but has throws a nice ball

You also told us Drew Allar reminds you of Peyton Manning.

 

You can like who you like, but I'm not touching any QB outside of Ward or Sanders.

 

I would be more comfortable trading for a Sam Howell than taking a chance on a project QB. Maybe Canales might find a QB who likes later in the draft who knows. I'm just not a fan of this class outside of the top 2 QBs.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

You also told us Drew Allar reminds you of Peyton Manning.

 

You can like who you like, but I'm not touching any QB outside of Ward or Sanders.

 

I would be more comfortable trading for a Sam Howell than taking a chance on a project QB. Maybe Canales might find a QB who likes later in the draft who knows. I'm just not a fan of this class outside of the top 2 QBs.

 

Your reading comprehension is probably around a 3rd grade level if we are being honest

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/5/2024 at 7:12 PM, CamWhoaaCam said:

Colorado #20 in the rankings. They win out it will be impossible to keep them out the playoffs. Love them or hate them they bring in major viewership with the 2 best players in the country.

 

See you hating suckas in the playoffs!

Colorado viewership is down 49% vs last year 

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Colorado has been on Nat'l tv every game this season.

 

I thought you were done with Colorado talk?

 

Patiently waiting for them to lose again huh.

You were talking about viewership.  There literally was a bit article last week on ESPN with their numbers.  Colorado viewership is down 50% this year.  

Once the new-ness wears off….its just spamming okay-ish BIG12 football every weekend to everyone.   They playing Matt Rhule anytime soon again? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ewers is still my guy this draft. he isnt perfect by any means but he can sling it. if anything the stinker, against uga helps lower the stock and im ok with that. cant give him a pass, but expecting him to be blowing people away every game isnt a fair standard either. hes showing again how dominant he can be, even when he lost a bunch of 1st and 2nd round nfl guys each of the last 2 years. love to pair him with XL, coker, j. sander, and 1 more true WR. he would be just fine behind this line. helps the shark is there as coach, think he's an NFL OC mind that is loving life as the Texas HC, and the shark may never leave that spot cause its $$$$$, NIL $$$$$$$$$, and blue chip program. 

really its going to come down to post season play on the stock watch. another stinker against NFL talent and its going to drop ewer's stock again. and yes manning would be a great pickup, but he's not eligible. if ewers has a good post season like stroud, he will lock in my #1 QB pick. that postseason locked me in on stroud, and ewers will get the opportunity barring injury or another really bad game. think ewers and stroud got over analyzed due to prospect fatigue where  we're more apt to downgrade due to a bad game as they have been good/great so often.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...