Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What could they realistically get for Bryce??

Jmac

By Jmac,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Navy_football said:

Personally don't think it's a good idea to trade the #1 pick in the draft after 18 games. That's too early to completely give up on him.

Well, give up or not, you paid big time for 4 years of control and the 5th year option. If you were certain he just was a drag on things you may not care about that but that isn't nothing.

For one thing that should really attractive to a suitor, if there are any. And there are always suitors for QBs. 

The play is to have that Buffalo drive in an official game, even if it is just garbage time. I don't see non garbage time defenses giving him anything but if somehow you could get a matchup where he could look good then you stick him in there and hope he can look like more than he is. 

Maybe you can get a much better return.

If they really think he is an NFL starter then no way they should trade him. I actually trust the staff to make that call. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
CPF4LIFE Grand Master

CPF4LIFE

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Navy_football said:

Personally don't think it's a good idea to trade the #1 pick in the draft after 18 games. That's too early to completely give up on him.

The thing is...its not about the pick. It's about the player drafted at that pick. Bryce was always a special case, the rare red flags were there. Smallest qb ever, no arm strength for the nfl, no physical traits that stand out. You don't have those discussions about most qbs that come out no matter where they are drafted.  And those things can't be coached up. That was always the concern and sets him apart from everybody else. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

The thing is...its not about the pick. It's about the player drafted at that pick. Bryce was always a special case, the rare red flags were there. Smallest qb ever, no arm strength for the nfl, no physical traits that stand out. You don't have those discussions about most qbs that come out no matter where they are drafted.  And those things can't be coached up. That was always the concern and sets him apart from everybody else. 

If people want to put it all on the Panthers, let them if the price is right.

If that is the plan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Navy_football Grand Master

Navy_football

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

The thing is...its not about the pick. It's about the player drafted at that pick. Bryce was always a special case, the rare red flags were there. Smallest qb ever, no arm strength for the nfl, no physical traits that stand out. You don't have those discussions about most qbs that come out no matter where they are drafted.  And those things can't be coached up. That was always the concern and sets him apart from everybody else. 

Yeah, but dude has regressed in 2 games this season. These are throws he's made before - in the NFL. These are reads he's made before - in the NFL. Something ain't right with him. And it isn't physical. It's mental. He has much better protection, much better receivers and a much better scheme. He should be playing better.

But then again, do you want a mentally weak guy on your team - at QB? Maybe I've convinced myself...

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
Just now, Hoenheim said:

If there was a belief in Bryce why the fug did they bench him???

Because he is a disaster. He was getting no better at all. Hurting the team. 

But the FoMO is real, they want to try and fix him a little and see if he responds with better play, I guess. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Seltzer
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By Seltzer · Posted

      By all indications, the surgery was "minor." I know with all surgeries and especially back surgery there can be complications, but I think the whole time Tremble did this with the expectation he would be able to be back for Week 1 It sounds like he will be ready to start back in team drills next week. He's a veteran who knows the system so I'm sure that helps. I still can't imagine he will play a normal workload early on though 
    • Seltzer
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By Seltzer · Posted

      Maybe. He was pretty good in college before a bad injury. He had a good preseason last year as a UDFA in Washington and was on their practice squad all year so they obviously saw something worth developing. He signed a futures deal with the Panthers earlier this year, and everything about him has been increasingly positive. Tremayne has gotten a decent amount of time with the ones, and a lot with the twos for someone that doesn't have a chance. He's the only other 6'4" plus WR on the team, plays ST, and is a more natural backup to the X receiver position than David Moore. That was my thinking behind it. But he may well end up as one of the last roster cuts. If so, I do hope they can bring him back to the PS. But I personally think there's a good chance he could be claimed given his ST ability and what hes shown at WR.
    • Seltzer
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By Seltzer · Posted

      That was my thought originally, but so many of the beat writers have mentioned keeping 7 WRs in conversations that I went with that, at least for the purposes of this projection. But you're right that historically defensive guys who were standouts at ST have tradionally gotten those last spots  
×
×
  • Create New...