Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Adam Schefter: Several teams interested in trading for Bryce Young


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

If Dalton moves the ball and we get points and look like an NFL team, other teams will not be the only ones that notice.

In that situation, it is some huge humble pie for Young. Maybe cut whatever delusions he is having about being held back.... may put his ass to thinking and this trade me crap turns into help me. 

edit: If he thinks he'll be coddled as the future somewhere else like he has been here.... ugh. No. It is put out or get out.

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

I KNOW! Crazy right?  It seems like I've said this before. 😉It's like in construction, trying to put the roof on house before the foundation has been poured or have the walls built.  But hey, the Tepper-era Panthers are going to be unconventional, right?

We will see with Andy if the offense is ready for a rookie QB. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WTF are we doing?

 

Schefter just said we are not trading Bryce and we plan on going back to him as starter later in the season.

 

This franchise is a joke. Clearly their is a struggle with power within the franchise. Smells like Tepper still wants Bryce to prove himself before Canales moves on from him completely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, CRA said:

JJ reported the highest offer has been a 4th. 
 

Guess Tepper is just embarrassed what they media new cycle will say….given we traded away our roster and all those picks….for a 4th

It doesn't make sense to trade him until the offseason. Either from a roster standpoint or financially.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

WTF are we doing?

 

Schefter just said we are not trading Bryce and we plan on going back to him as starter later in the season.

 

This franchise is a joke. Clearly their is a struggle with power within the franchise. Smells like Tepper still wants Bryce to prove himself before Canales moves on from him completely.

Who knows with Tepper's Panthers? Could be a ploy to try to create more trade value. Could be Tepper waffling from moving on seeing how the media is all rallying behind Bryce and blaming his failures completely on the Panthers which to me is obviously just their way of coping with being wildly wrong about his NFL projection themselves.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

WTF are we doing?

 

Schefter just said we are not trading Bryce and we plan on going back to him as starter later in the season.

 

This franchise is a joke. Clearly their is a struggle with power within the franchise. Smells like Tepper still wants Bryce to prove himself before Canales moves on from him completely.

Plans change. If the offseason looks moderately competent with Dalton, I suspect the change will be permanent(barring injury). Otherwise Canales may lose the locker room. If that happens, the hole we are in becomes even deeper.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Who knows with Tepper's Panthers? Could be a ploy to try to create more trade value. Could be Tepper waffling from moving on seeing how the media is all rallying behind Bryce and blaming his failures completely on the Panthers which to me is obviously just their way of coping with being wildly wrong about his NFL projection themselves.

I mean, I don't think they are necessarily wrong. Perhaps his career arc is substantially different if he was riding the pine for a couple of seasons behind a guy like Dalton or another successful starting QB. Given what we saw last season, it doesn't look like the decision to start him was left to any of our head coaches. I think it's a stretch to say he might have been an elite guy but maybe his career arc is more like Colt McCoy rather than Josh Rosen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I mean, I don't think they are necessarily wrong. Perhaps his career arc is substantially different if he was riding the pine for a couple of seasons behind a guy like Dalton or another successful starting QB. Given what we saw last season, it doesn't look like the decision to start him was left to any of our head coaches. I think it's a stretch to say he might have been an elite guy but maybe his career arc is more like Colt McCoy rather than Josh Rosen.

Yeah, the arc would be different. It would've taken a couple of years before his obvious lack of NFL talent was exposed.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...