Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers open practice window for 5 injured players


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I honestly thought he was the best RB in the draft. Just carolina was not player for him, given the needs and value. The RB is lower than the safety market, derrick henry was signed for 2 years at 16 million. Many others cases, but panthers used a prime spot on guy that may not play half the year with 3 other guys already here. just bad management.

It only makes sense if he goes prime jamaal charles. 

In terms of resource allocation to the position I agree with you completely and I've been saying that for years now. We'll just have to see how it shakes out though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, BullCityP said:

Kneeland has 8 tackles 0 sacks. Kool-aid isn't even starting, Jenkins has 2 tackles 0 sacks. Our guy hasn't even played and is making the same impact of the guys you named lol. Getting the best RB in the draft but having to wait 5-6 weeks for him to play isn't bad at all. 

i didnt look at stats, just being honest form the draft time.

jenkins has missed games.

brooks has lost game snaps and reps, hes FARRR behind and will never reach the other names unless they get hurt. Hes behind on everything besides rehabbing. 

we'll see, he feels like a 2025 pick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, frankw said:

In terms of resource allocation to the position I agree with you completely and I've been saying that for years now. We'll just have to see how it shakes out though.

You spend recourses to get GOOD PLAYERS which we don't have alot of right now no matter the position. We aren't in the position to pick and choose which positions we take just draft BPA and get as many good players as we can each draft.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BullCityP said:

You spend recourses to get GOOD PLAYERS which we don't have alot of right now no matter the position. We aren't in the position to pick and choose which positions we take just draft BPA and get as many good players as we can each draft.

according to many brooks was clearly the highest player on their board and they were worried about dallas jumping up since jerrah said he was the best interview in 30 years. funny dallas still needs a RB or even two.

Im a value nerd, RB is down there with kickers currently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BullCityP said:

You spend recourses to get GOOD PLAYERS which we don't have alot of right now no matter the position. We aren't in the position to pick and choose which positions we take just draft BPA and get as many good players as we can each draft.

Of course but when you have squandered resources the way we have the last few years on either bad to simply horrific investments when you trade up to acquire talent for a roster that is depleted across the board like ours you need to get results sooner rather than later. But he has to play this season. This is a crucial developmental season for a lot of young guys. If he can't go at all that is an unequivocal fail for the time being as far as grading the selection goes.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Brooks was very much a draft pick for next season. Chuba has developed into an excellent RB but he's gonna be a free agent and Miles Sanders can be cut in the offseason or possibly traded in-season. 

My opinion is this--a RB rarely earns the second contract--they peak around age 27.  If you recall, we drafted another Jonathan running back off the surgeon's table--Stewart.  He spent a lot of time on the exercise bike if you recall, and I would argue, even though he was successful as a player, he was not a value.  In my view, RBs are so plentiful and they hit the wall so quickly, I would not sign a RB to a pricey second contract.  Now, if anyone adopted my position, we will pay Brooks for 4 years to give us 3 years of productivity.  Furthermore,  Texas had/has a solid OL and passing game.  I am not sure that he will be as good without those two advantages....We shall see.  I would have rather seen us go a different direction with the second overall pick.  I hope he proves me wrong--I am not predicting that he will fail--and I think (with Sanders doing OK at times and Chuba) I would give him a few more weeks to heal.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TarHeel69 said:

I understand Wonnum had Quad surgery.  Just wondering if the team is being extra cautious or is he gonna be another vet coming in here to collect a check?  I'm a realist, I know he isn't going to fix the pass rush.

He had a setback during the rehabbing of that quad. He was on time for TC, but that was 2 months ago. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

My opinion is this--a RB rarely earns the second contract--they peak around age 27.  If you recall, we drafted another Jonathan running back off the surgeon's table--Stewart.  He spent a lot of time on the exercise bike if you recall, and I would argue, even though he was successful as a player, he was not a value.  In my view, RBs are so plentiful and they hit the wall so quickly, I would not sign a RB to a pricey second contract.  Now, if anyone adopted my position, we will pay Brooks for 4 years to give us 3 years of productivity.  Furthermore,  Texas had/has a solid OL and passing game.  I am not sure that he will be as good without those two advantages....We shall see.  I would have rather seen us go a different direction with the second overall pick.  I hope he proves me wrong--I am not predicting that he will fail--and I think (with Sanders doing OK at times and Chuba) I would give him a few more weeks to heal.

That along with the current RB market, its at the lowest its been % wise. Teams are paying WRs, OGs, DTs, dam near all spots minus ST before RBs.

 https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/year/2024/position/rb/sort/contract_value

 

3rd slot WRs are getting more. 

 

Sure you need good players, but Ill take a good Edge over elite Long snapper. 

Panthers should know this and take advantage, but like my friend said after the draft "Dan drafted like its still his playing era." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, MHS831 said:

My opinion is this--a RB rarely earns the second contract--they peak around age 27.  If you recall, we drafted another Jonathan running back off the surgeon's table--Stewart.  He spent a lot of time on the exercise bike if you recall, and I would argue, even though he was successful as a player, he was not a value.  In my view, RBs are so plentiful and they hit the wall so quickly, I would not sign a RB to a pricey second contract.  Now, if anyone adopted my position, we will pay Brooks for 4 years to give us 3 years of productivity.  Furthermore,  Texas had/has a solid OL and passing game.  I am not sure that he will be as good without those two advantages....We shall see.  I would have rather seen us go a different direction with the second overall pick.  I hope he proves me wrong--I am not predicting that he will fail--and I think (with Sanders doing OK at times and Chuba) I would give him a few more weeks to heal.

To me, his selection falls under the 'sell out for Bryce's sake' draft philosophy we had adopted. The catching and route running in addition to the ball carrying was the motivation for targeting him. 

I'd have rather not signed both guards to that huge money and found a real good prospect. But I understood what was going on. 

At the time, I saw it as important for Young to have all the excuses thoroughly countered so things would  be clear - for whoever wasn't clear. So wasn't bitching like a lot of people were over no center.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
    • You’re playing madden we’re talking real football stuff…. He does have you seen his special on internet he def thinks he’s getting paid 
    • Without the team having an identity kinda hard to predict what they value.  They either are really trying to build a balanced team, or preparing for another swing at qb if Bryce doesn’t pan out. Seems like we value the o line but the $ spent there has been underwhelming besides Lewis, you could say it’s because of injuries but still hasn’t been worth the investment. as already stated, the whole handling of Bryce young as a whole has been ass backwards, we spent the years we’re supposed to take advantage of having a qb with a lower cap hit, building the team up to be adequate. now It appears, key word appears, the saints have done it correctly, which is painful to even think about. Regardless, I hope the front office has paid attention to qb contracts recently, such as Tua, Kyler, Daniel jones(pre colts) and don’t settle for subpar qb play at franchise qb rates    
×
×
  • Create New...