Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bears week


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, CBDellinger said:

Pfffttt… Bears passed on Stroud AND  Daniels for Caleb.  Haha!  

Yeah after all that, even if he works out as a decent QB he doesn't look as special as what they passed up on their own end. He might not even outplay Fields this year or next. Or Malik Willis for that matter lol although the Packers always seem to have an issue of two good starting qb's

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

I really have no idea why people think that Caleb is going to have a big day against us. 

We have yet to allow a passer hit 250 yards. That includes Derek Carr, Joe Burrow and Justin Herbert.

 

They are just going to run the ball. It’s what all teams are doing against us which is why the passing yards look like that. We are missing DB, Tuttle, Jewell, and Shaq. That’s over half of our front 7. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

They are just going to run the ball. It’s what all teams are doing against us which is why the passing yards look like that. We are missing DB, Tuttle, Jewell, and Shaq. That’s over half of our front 7. 

They have the 29th ranked rushing offense at 87.3 YPG. 

This is what I mean by I am not understanding why people think Caleb is going to have a big day against us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, kungfoodude said:

They have the 29th ranked rushing offense at 87.3 YPG. 

This is what I mean by I am not understanding why people think Caleb is going to have a big day against us.

History says we, especially how the defense is looking, are other teams’ get right game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Manna said:

History says we, especially how the defense is looking, are other teams’ get right game. 

Oh they will rush over their average but they also only average 165.8 YPG through the air. 

Again, Caleb Williams is not a good QB and we have done fairly decent against way, way, WAY better QB's so far.

We got passed on by notorious accurate passers and Caleb Williams is extremely inaccurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

They have the 29th ranked rushing offense at 87.3 YPG. 

This is what I mean by I am not understanding why people think Caleb is going to have a big day against us.

I understand that and the Bengals averaged 89.3 yards per game until they played us and put up 141. We just don’t have the players to stop the run. I’m not saying the Bears will win but they are going to run the ball against us. I’m not as worried about Caleb. They are going to rely on their defense which is good and running the ball against our banged up defense. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I understand that and the Bengals averaged 89.3 yards per game until they played us and put up 141. We just don’t have the players to stop the run. I’m not saying the Bears will win but they are going to run the ball against us. I’m not as worried about Caleb. They are going to rely on their defense which is good and running the ball against our banged up defense. 

I don't disagree they will do better than their rushing average but when they resort to throwing, we may make them pay.

Also remember that is not a smart OC or HC.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I don't disagree they will do better than their rushing average but when they resort to throwing, we may make them pay.

Also remember that is not a smart OC or HC.

It’s definitely winnable. Our defense just needs to dig deep because I’m not sure our offense can score as much as they have against the previous 2 defenses. We need Wallace to play well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...