Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Opinions on Ekwonu


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ForJimmy said:

Hell I might throw an extension his way before he gets more expensive. He is a decent young LT with even more upside 

Eh....you know I would rather wait a little bit and end up overpaying for a great player than pay too early and find out they are not a great player.

I really intensely dislike that move in all but a few cases.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Eh....you know I would rather wait a little bit and end up overpaying for a great player than pay too early and find out they are not a great player.

I really intensely dislike that move in all but a few cases.

Yeah I don't want to hear any extensions talk for anyone on this team. Anyone not already extended will not be extended until the end of the season, if at all. You don't hand out big contracts to players on the worst team in the league. It's loonisy to even consider it. 

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Eh....you know I would rather wait a little bit and end up overpaying for a great player than pay too early and find out they are not a great player.

I really intensely dislike that move in all but a few cases.

That’s fair. I’m assuming he will look better if we actually keep him in the same offensive in consecutive years… Regardless his play this year has to be towards the bottom of things I’m concerned about. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

Yeah I don't want to hear any extensions talk for anyone on this team. Anyone not already extended will not be extended until the end of the season, if at all. You don't had out big contracts to players on the worst team in the league. It's loonisy to even consider it. 

Yeah, the only guy I am probably having that discussion with is Johnson's agent in case we start getting viable trade offers. If he has zero desire to stick around or wants bananas money, you would be foolish to not consider trade offers.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Eh....you know I would rather wait a little bit and end up overpaying for a great player than pay too early and find out they are not a great player.

I really intensely dislike that move in all but a few cases.

True. Fitterer would have offered him a 5 year extension after the raiders game. 

  • Beer 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, the only guy I am probably having that discussion with is Johnson's agent in case we start getting viable trade offers. If he has zero desire to stick around or wants bananas money, you would be foolish to not consider trade offers.

I would try to trade Johnson myself. This team is in no shape to be paying big money to a wr right now. It's time time draft and play those players and take our lumps. Worry about signing our own drafted receiver to a long term contract if we ever draft one worth it.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Yeah I don't want to hear any extensions talk for anyone on this team. Anyone not already extended will not be extended until the end of the season, if at all. You don't hand out big contracts to players on the worst team in the league. It's loonisy to even consider it. 

Understandable. I was thinking he would be cheap right now and he wouldn’t have to worry about LT for a while. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

I would try to trade Johnson myself. This team is in no shape to be paying big money to a wr right now. It's time time draft and play those players and take our lumps. Worry about signing our own drafted receiver to a long term contract if we ever draft one worth it.

To me that is about two prices. The price Johnson wants and the trade offers we get. If he's reasonably affordable(sub-20 mil APY), I keep him and extend.

If we get offered more than a 4th, that's an incentive to move him by the trade deadline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, PNW_PantherMan said:

800px-Robby_Anderson_-_51702187481_(crop

That was an overpayment on a FA we just signed. Much similar to DJ now who people are wanting to extend. Icky would be a player we drafted in year 3 of his contract. It’s still early on Icky because we get that 5th year option and some of these other expensive OL might be off the books by then. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Understandable. I was thinking he would be cheap right now and he wouldn’t have to worry about LT for a while. 

Paying him now does not remove the worry about LT. I would not extend him until I had to because, as you've seen, you do not know how the season will play out or who may be available in the draft. Patience padawon.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Understandable. I was thinking he would be cheap right now and he wouldn’t have to worry about LT for a while. 

And if he then regresses and looks like he's not very good at LT again?  I would rather just wait and see how he does.  We need a bigger sample size of good games.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

To me that is about two prices. The price Johnson wants and the trade offers we get. If he's reasonably affordable(sub-20 mil APY), I keep him and extend.

If we get offered more than a 4th, that's an incentive to move him by the trade deadline.

I'm just not enamored with what he brings to this team in it's current state. To me it would be a wasted contract without a future qb to develop with him. Until we have that it's just not financially feasible to invest big in receivers when you don't have a qb and probably won't for a couple more seasons yet. I think they should just keep drafting them and let the cream rise to the top. When they do that's who you throw money at.

Edited by Jon Snow
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Some of you act like one can't learn from experience over time. Just because you may not know what you're doing in 2018 doesn't mean that you don't know what you're doing in 2025. Frankly, you grow from experience, and success and excellence gives first-time applicants the hand probably 99.999% of the time.
    • It's an interesting topic of conversation as sports evolves. I think ultimately it would lead to a number of small market franchises folding though. Especially in the NBA where there are so many bad teams that have been bad for years and years in some cases already. But as it stands I think athlete pay draft or no draft aside has reached a point where we can and should realistically ask should they make that much compared to the average person. Now college athletes is a different conversation but even that reaches a breaking point. But we could go down the rabbit hole on this even further into overall entertainment and talk about actors making absurd sums too. In the end I think in sports the powers that be won't allow these changes to even be considered because it opens the door for so many other variables. But who knows how long sports like football will realistically be around after people like us pass on. We're only just now learning about things like CTE which the league and the sport in general will only be able to run away from for so long. As far as the NBA goes my understanding is viewership has been steadily going down for a number of reasons but one crucial aspect is key players missing so many games. The NBA has to figure that out regardless. Especially when considering fans who pay to see these athletes compete in person. But hey I guess let's just try to appreciate what we've got while it still exists in this form eh?
    • I can't see a world where the money goes down, but maybe your lottery odds are now your contract numbers you can offer.  Thunder? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 20 million.  Hornets? You can offer Flagg 4 years, 80 million.  Some form of a system where the money is still there, but so is the freedom of choice (on top of bad teams getting *some* competitive advantage to signing them). 
×
×
  • Create New...