Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jets Trade for Devante Adams


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

These dudes have gone for 3rd round picks. You guys better hang up the idea of getting anything over that for DJ in a trade. I honestly doubt he'd get more than a 4th at most and I would still trade him for that.

I mean DJ is cheaper and adams has like 38 million next yr with being 32 years old. 

Its a combo of many things. 

Jets are 2-4 and I doubt this makes much a difference, so that pick should be in 70s. WHile a KC 3rd should be in the 90s. 

The other deal to this is say DJ signs a big 25 million per deal on the open market(very possible). Well very likely unless the team sign someone to a similar deal, you get a 2026 3rd round comp (90s). Thats part of the issue too. 

My take is I doubt KC values Djohnson with his sus hands. I dont think hes been in a system that is close to Reids, so language and getting in sync with QB are huge problems.  

Dan has to know where players stand, he needs all the picks/lotto tickets possible. 

Edited by Basbear
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

These dudes have gone for 3rd round picks. You guys better hang up the idea of getting anything over that for DJ in a trade. I honestly doubt he'd get more than a 4th at most and I would still trade him for that.

I think a 4th is unlikely. Adams is a little different scenario price-wise because he had a very limited list of suitors. That always impacts trade value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Remember we had our own Josh Allen in Cam Newton and we could never get him a true #1 WR.

 

Ginn was the best we could do. It hurts we should have a championship in the Cam Newton era. We really let that man put the team on his back for multiple years and it cut his career short.

 

 

Broski, he had smitty, sure late stage prime smitty, but still. They couldnt get along cause CAm was too busy playing the role and smitty wanted playoff wins. 
 

Cam also had Greg olsen, who was a top TE for years. 

 

Everyone always acts like Cam and nothing else, which is fake news. He had a top tier Defense, 2 stud RBs, olsen, best IOL, and smitty. The GM used draft picks as well to aid him. He had more than enough, god dam shame he and luke couldnt win back-2-back seasons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Broski, he had smitty, sure late stage prime smitty, but still. They couldnt get along cause CAm was too busy playing the role and smitty wanted playoff wins. 
 

Cam also had Greg olsen, who was a top TE for years. 

 

Everyone always acts like Cam and nothing else, which is fake news. He had a top tier Defense, 2 stud RBs, olsen, best IOL, and smitty. The GM used draft picks as well to aid him. He had more than enough, god dam shame he and luke couldnt win back-2-back seasons. 

Cam was young. Prime Cam should have had a #1 WR.

 

Mahomes had Kelce and he also had Hill.

 

A TE wasn't enough. The media even discussed the lack of weapons Cam had during his career. This is not made up it's facts.

 

Ginn Jr. and Kelvin Benjamin was what they put around prime Cam. Just terrible!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To rub salt in the wound when you look back to what were considered some of the most underwhelming resulting seasons in Panthers history before the Tepper's came along we still managed a top 20 passing offense with journeyman Matt Moore and the ghost of Jake Delhomme in 2009. And Steve Smith was 44th in the league in YAC so it was not a chunk play pass offense. Obviously the run game was dominant with Jonathan Stewart and Deangelo Wiliams but comparatively the run game in 2009 only amassed 500 more rushing yards than the 2025 Panthers in a down year for Chuba Hubbard. It shows just how comically desperate we have become to adjust standards that actually used to mean something.
    • I wouldn't have picked up the option, to me he's that replaceable. I think the Panthers are taking a more cautious strategy, not ready to move on yet but also holding off on committing to him until the last possible time.  Basically, he's a competent NFL QB. He's bottom third in the league. That's actually not a terrible thing. You can win some with a bottom third QB. If over time he takes a few steps forward he might be a median level QB. I think those are the kinds of steps that Canales is talking about. If you've truly got a median level QB, it's probably worth keeping him as opposed to roll on the dice in the draft. But just to be super clear, I don't think he is capable of taking those steps, and I think we should and will move on after the season
    • Unfortunately this is more wishful thinking than anything. The problem is the bar is so low for what they consider success for Bryce Young. I mean we have yet to field even a top 25 passing offense with Bryce Young heading into his fourth season and it's basically considered a when not if we begin contract extension talks with him.
×
×
  • Create New...