Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young QB School

Jackie Lee

By Jackie Lee,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

I really don’t want to watch it but I am curious what he said?  

He pointed out the good and bad in Bryce, the offense and the play calling. His voice can be annoying but he's pretty good at breaking down plays and route combinations. He admits he doesn't know the progressions but he does a good job explaining what they should have been given the defensive look. It seems fair and balanced with good and bad.

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-TownCat Grand Master

L-TownCat

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

He pointed out the good and bad in Bryce, the offense and the play calling. His voice can be annoying but he's pretty good at breaking down plays and route combinations. He admits he doesn't know the progressions but he does a good job explaining what they should have been given the defensive look. It seems fair and balanced with good and bad.

I guess my real question is, did he say Bryce was salvageable or is he just singularly focused on this one game?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

The bottom line is bryce looks vastly better than weeks 1 and 2 and there is no reason to not play him moving forward. There is no downside. If he starts sucking again we are right back where we are right now. But if he can continue to improve (even if he will never be a top 10 QB) we can build the team around him and bide our time till the right QB becomes available. 

  • Pie 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TN05 Veteran

TN05

Posted
Posted (edited)

It's definitely his best game yet, but I wouldn't call it better than an above-average game. He had some nice throws, and a few big drops (the INT was not his fault!). I was particularly impressed by his willingness to throw it deep(er) than usual, and he did a good job avoiding pressure. But his completion percentage was padded by very, very poorly thought out checkdowns, some of which killed drives, and we only put up 23 on the worst defense in the league.

After the Green Bay game, I learned better than to get excited. If he can string together some more games like this, maybe he can be some team's Teddy Bridgewater.

Edited by TN05
  • Pie 5
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
JawnyBlaze Grand Master

JawnyBlaze

Posted
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, SOJA said:

The bottom line is bryce looks vastly better than weeks 1 and 2 and there is no reason to not play him moving forward. There is no downside. If he starts sucking again we are right back where we are right now. But if he can continue to improve (even if he will never be a top 10 QB) we can build the team around him and bide our time till the right QB becomes available. 

The reason not to play him would be that he’s not on the team anymore because he was wisely traded away when his stock probably won’t be any higher. If he is still on the team next Sunday, then yea might as well keep playing him. 

Edited by JawnyBlaze
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, L-TownCat said:

I guess my real question is, did he say Bryce was salvageable or is he just singularly focused on this one game?

Just 1 game. No predictions made just breaks down the play and the concepts. I found it enlightening and worth the watch if you can get past how annoying the sound of his voice is.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

The reason not to play him would be that he’s not on the team anymore because he was wisely traded away when his stock probably won’t be any higher. If he is still on the team next Sunday, then yea might as well keep playing him. 

well yea if they get something worthwhile for him than yes I'd pull the trigger but I can't see a team offering something high for him right now. Russini said on her pod we'd likely get more for him in the offseason anyway 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Khyber53
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      I think you've nailed what we need right here.  Rodriguez and Thieneman would be my choices, Thieneman in the first and Rodriguez in the second. Let everyone else eat up their picks on the crop of WRs and linemen. Then make a push in free agency for the top center.
    • MHS831
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By MHS831 · Posted

      Vernon Gholston vibes?  had 14 sacks at Ohio State in 2007; 45 games in the NFL:  0 sacks.  
    • MHS831
      2026 NFL Combine Thread: 2.26.26 - 3.1.26

      By MHS831 · Posted

      I want a high impact player, but a true FS who could qb the secondary might be more effective than we realize.  I don't think Moehrig is that guy (I think he is overpaid, however).  I want a flashy, high impact player, but we could use defensive qbs at ILB  and FS.  By upgrading skill AND adding vision and leadership, could we get better than if we added an edge or OT? I am not sure that I believe this myself, but I try to look at things from all perspectives.  Here is some devil's advocacy stuff: 1. EDGE-We are freaking out about the pressure we put on the qb from the edge position.  However, Jones II and Wonnum missed a total of 22 games. Scourton was a rookie and Princely was a third rounder.  Wharton sucked (not sure if he was used properly--a hybrid who can rush from the 5 tech or 3, etc), and this put more pressure on Scourton and the other edge players.  This year, we get Jones II, Scourton should continue to evolve with Princely.  Perhaps another rookie is not what we need.  Maybe a veteran situational pass rusher.  2. OFFENSIVE TACKLE:  Of course, we need an OT, but the draft is loaded with OTs that can pass block but struggle in run blocking--so a rookie at LT might not be the answer for a team that wants to run first.  What to do?  I am not sure.  I see Nijman returning after testing the market, but who knows? 3.  INSIDE LB:  A huge need, regardless of how you spin it.  However, I see a few free agents who would be solid here, and I see the second round having a few ILBs with starting potential.  I do not see an ILB worth the first round pick unless a freak falls to us. 4.  With veteran defensive backs, a young, intelligent FS could fit in nicely. Intelligence is key--like the way Luke made the front 7 better. "A good, intelligent free safety (FS) acts as the "quarterback of the defense" transforming a unit from good to great by acting as the last line of defense, communicating pre-snap adjustments, and anticipating plays before they happen. By reading the quarterback's eyes and diagnosing offensive schemes, an intelligent FS acts as a "centerfielder" who can neutralize deep threats and mitigate errors made by cornerbacks or linebackers."  
×
×
  • Create New...